48 Comments

Summary:

This past Friday, Facebook started issuing vanity URLs to its 200 million-plus community. It was a big change for the social-networking company that has so far used unique numerical identifications to identify its members. Not anymore — now you can go to Facebook.com/OmMalik and friend me. […]

This past Friday, Facebook started issuing vanity URLs to its 200 million-plus community. It was a big change for the social-networking company that has so far used unique numerical identifications to identify its members.

Not anymore — now you can go to Facebook.com/OmMalik and friend me. It was such a major event that, even on the weekend, it was the talk of Twitter, Facebook’s rival social network.

Some have viewed this move towards vanity URLs as a way for Facebook to get more search engine juice. In reality, it might be Facebook’s next attack on Twitter. Facebook earlier this year launched status updates. With vanity URLs, it’s now getting into the name space business, something Twitter really excels at.

It makes sense for Facebook to do this — it is set up as a multi-purpose communication platform that lacks the ease of use of a Twitter. So why not offer the same things? By making it easy for people to identify themselves on Facebook using their real (or almost real) IDs, the company can get people to start using their Facebook handles.

A friend of mine today speculated that it is only a matter of time before Facebook starts offering an @replies service. I totally agree, and it would be the most obvious thing for Facebook to do. Just like you can point a comment to me by typing @om on Twitter, it is a safe bet you’ll be able to do the same on Facebook. It will increase the utility of Facebook as a communications platform. It will also increase the number of times one has to use Facebook, which means boosting page views and more advertising revenue. Of course, in the process, if Facebook can take a big bite out of Twitter’s growth, I am sure Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg isn’t going to complain.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. But, doesn’t Twitter have a much richer ecosystem of third-party services?

    On top of that, I find that I LEARN so much more from my Twitter community (which I have conscientiously cultivated) than I can comparatively learn from my Facebook circle of friends!

  2. Ah ha! Ok now. Dave Morin’s comment that the “/ is the new @” makes way more sense!

    Brilliant move by Facebook, that is, if Zuckerberg and the 800 employees at Facebook act on implementing an @replies service! That would immediately endanger twitter of extinction.

    I welcome the unified communication potential of @replies integrated right within Facebook. Plus Facebook “feeds” (friend lists) functionality will be a huge advantage over the highly simplistic twitter web client which lacks groups.

    Twitter has really sat on their own hands for entirely too long – innovate or die. Twitter’s failure to improve the web client has really surprised me, especially since we see so many client tools and greasemonkey scripts which clearly add value; yet, twitter has not implemented these – with the exception of the @mentions behavior.

    Thanks Om, nice article!

    http://facebook.com/susanbeebe
    http://twitter.com/susanbeebe

    1. The Twitter ecosystem is extremely innovative, which takes the pressure off Twitter from having to make big changes most of the time. In lots of ways, Facebook is attempting to Twitter-ize themselves out of the corner that backed themselves into, after they failed to acquire Twitter.

      1. Albert,
        I totally agree with you

  3. Chris Messina Saturday, June 13, 2009

    / is the new @” says Dave Morin.

    You might be on to something. *wink wink*

  4. Donald Townsend Sunday, June 14, 2009

    Twitter still has one major advantage over Facebook – simplicity. It’s tweets and ony just tweets.

    1. If simplicity is twitters Advantage, then i would say that its also a great disadvantage too for twitter.
      I mean there is no service to manage your followers or non-followers, there is always a follow , no-follow game going on twitter.

      Anyway i think twitter would be in real trouble if facebook will add @replies feature too.

  5. yeah thats great i built one.

  6. Vad NU! » Blog Archive » Wrong kind of vanity Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] other day the craze of the web was to get ones hand on ones vanity URL on Facebook. But eventhough I scrambled to get mine, I’m wondering why we’re so busy being vain [...]

  7. / if that were the case why would they not just use @. Perhaps another example of reactionary and slow “TB” syndrome…growing “too big” too quickly into a corporate structure where decisions are made by making sure “you pissed on the rock”. Polaroid, GM, etc… have all either failed because of this corporate syndrome, Google comes out with a great idea in Wave but the usability, for the everyday user…looks like you would have to go to pilot’s school… etc… facebook is not leading it’s following now… and playing “we are more innovative than them”
    Pretty sure if they were leading they would have just adopted the @. This looks like a big, corporate, group decision to try and go after something that is leading. If facebook and other companies don’t want to go the way of myspace…or Polaroid… figure out how to not suffer from TB growth. It effects the “innovative system”.

  8. Facebook vs. Twitter Comparisons are a Waste of Time | Mark Evans Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] it’s not surprising to see growing fascination about Twitter vs. Facebook as Facebook extends its platform to include features such as vanity URLs [...]

  9. Web Media Daily – Sunday June 14, 2009 | Reinventing Yourself… Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] Do Facebook Vanity URLs Equals Kill Twitter Vol. 2? [...]

  10. I just don’t see it touching twitter in that regard. Facebook is just used differently by the common user, I call it my #my100 less than 10 have Twitter, and none use it yet. But I refuse to feed my FB stream with constant chatter. The FB world doesn’t want that.

    ^—- I did nothing but repost the tweets I sent you about 2am this morning.

  11. Dave Taylor Sunday, June 14, 2009

    I dunno, Om, I’m not buying it. Just because Facebook might want to move into various arenas in the “web 2.0″ world, doesn’t automatically mean that it’ll be successful at them. Witness Google, or, better, Microsoft’s constant attempts to introduce something relevant and interesting. I find that I pay less attention to Facebook than Twitter already, and with the dearth of a healthy third-party ecosystem, I can’t see Facebook becoming more engaging or interesting.

    Now if I were at Facebook I know what I’d be focusing on: the email system. Make it graceful and easy for people to communicate privately and to groups, make it a real competitor to Gmail, and now you have a platform upon which you can build a case that it’s the go-to site for social media.

  12. Facebook’s Vanity URLs’ impact: web-based mail will be the big loser « leaving the flock Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] or not about these “Vanity URLs.”  Some, like Om Malik, speculate that it may take a bite out of Twitter’s growth.  I disagree with Om on this–I think the nature of the conversations and interaction in [...]

  13. I don’t see how (or why) you would use the @ replies feature in Facebook. The fundamental difference between FB & Twitter is that you only follow “friends’ on FB but on Twitter you can follow anybody so the @ reply system makes sense to get someone to notice you or give them a shout out. On FB you can comment and like something but to @ reply somebody you don’t know, you would have to know their / handle which means you would have to search for them, at which point you can always message them, which is a feature that exists already. So unless Facebook is going to make everyone’s profile public (which they sort of do right now albeit in a limited way), I don’t see the point of these vanity URLs except for businesses who can print them on their marketing materials. Perhaps 1 day we will all carry personal business cards with our Facebook / handle on them…

  14. Albert Willis Sunday, June 14, 2009

    Om–yes, you can where this is going. I had the same thought, after Facebook implemented “real-time” updates that @ replies couldn’t be that far away. One of the major social limitations is not being able to reference multiple people easily in a status update on Facebook.

    The tagging feature of Facebook Notes is a good first step, but @ replies would be much better.

  15. PS: There’s more than 1 Om Malik on FB. You should secure /OmMalik before writing about it O:-)

  16. Josh Porter at Bokardo had a great post on interface (he has many)…but immediate and simple and everything right there as soon as you interface. Twitter has that because it’s architecture is that… …facebook is trying to do that after you walk through the museum of interface that is facebook.

  17. Do Facebook Vanity URLs Equals Kill Twitter | GamersCircle Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] Facebook Vanity URLs Equals Kill Twitter // Do Facebook Vanity URLs Equals Kill Twitter Vol. 2?  —  This past Friday, Facebook started issuing vanity URLs to its 200 million plus [...]

  18. » Do Facebook Vanity URLs Equals Kill Twitter Vol. 2? (Do we even give a fuck?) ABORT Magazine™ – Terminate…The Intolerable. Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] READ MORE HERE [...]

  19. With an @user reply, the people following you have attention drawn to others you follow.

    Seems to me as though Facebook’s “Wall-to-Wall” is similar, letting someone that has you as a friend see there is a back and forth discussion between you and another friend they may not know.

  20. Social Milestone » Blog Archive » Do Facebook Vanity URLs Equals: Kill Twitter Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] Read more here Share and Enjoy: [...]

  21. Deep Jive Interests » On The So-Called “Gold Rush” For Facebook Vanity URLs Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] URLs June 14th, 2009 at 5:21 pm » Leave a Comment! According to Bloomberg, about 3 million vanity URLs have been snagged over the weekend: Facebook Inc., the world’s largest social-networking site, [...]

  22. I think the username thing is silly; it’s making it more like the other ‘social networking websites’, and well, things are better when it’s not all the same. Yeah, it’d be nice to know when people talk about you whatever with @’s, but at the same time, there goes the time spent searching around others pages.

  23. Michelle Schneider Sunday, June 14, 2009

    Twitter will survive somehow until Vol.6 then Google come to rescue

  24. Paul Solomon Sunday, June 14, 2009

    Twitter – For people with short attention spans.

    1. Hey that is pretty much everyone around us ;-) (Kidding)

  25. Copying features doesnt really makes one competitive enough. Twitter appeals to a diff. socio graph

  26. [TechBlogWatch] Best of Blogs für den 15.6: FireWire, Tesla, Schußsicheres Korsett,BKA, Vanity URLs | TechFieber | Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News. Sunday, June 14, 2009

    [...] Do Facebook Vanity URLs Equal Kill Twitter Vol. 2? [...]

  27. virtual online worlds for kids Monday, June 15, 2009

    May the best social network prevail. Afterall its good to have just one super network with everybody in it.

  28. EDITing in the Dark » Vain in the name Monday, June 15, 2009

    [...] certainly not the only one thinking about this, others include Wired (again), Silicone Beat and GigaOM. [...]

  29. Facebook Username Grab Generated Record Traffic Levels – News: Everything-e Monday, June 15, 2009

    [...] the Facebook team will likely spend a little while trying to catch up on lost sleep.  But Om Malik writes, "A friend of mine today speculated that it is only a matter of time before Facebook [...]

  30. Yeah, I’ve my short url.. Facebook is great :)

  31. Andrew Holt Monday, June 15, 2009

    As long as Facebook requires mutual relationships, it won’t directly compete with Twitter. I have started removing friends from Facebook because I’m tired of seeing updates from people I don’t really know that well, or find very interesting. Twitter and Facebook still seem to me to be very different communications mediums.

    Additionally, since Facebook allows wall posts and comments, is there any real advantage is a status update sent to someone directly? It’s already implemented in some manner.

  32. Facebook Username Grab Generated Record Traffic Levels | Blog Free Now Tuesday, June 16, 2009

    [...] the Facebook team will likely spend a little while trying to catch up on lost sleep.  But Om Malik writes, "A friend of mine today speculated that it is only a matter of time before Facebook [...]

  33. Top Posts « WordPress.com Tuesday, June 16, 2009

    [...] Do Facebook Vanity URLs Equal Kill Twitter Vol. 2? This past Friday, Facebook started issuing vanity URLs to its 200 million-plus community. It was a big change for the [...] [...]

  34. christine harrison Wednesday, June 17, 2009

    I think Facebook needs to be really careful here. Customization, in my opinion, is part of why myspace stopped working for users. The uniform profile and home page appearance makes it faster for people to browse and interact.

    In addition, Facebook was built on networks; people finding eachother through a common thread. Usernames being optional is fine, but like Twitter, Facebook should err on the side of caution and keep it simple.

  35. Facebook Username Grab Generated Record Traffic Levels | GoSocial.us : Building Brands in Social Media and Online Marketing Wednesday, June 17, 2009

    [...] the Facebook team will likely spend a little while trying to catch up on lost sleep.  But Om Malik writes, "A friend of mine today speculated that it is only a matter of time before Facebook [...]

  36. Can Twitter Become the New Casual Gaming Hub? « Tech Eruption Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    [...] all, much like Facebook, Twitter offers the virality so vital to a social network, a name space and thumbnails, a communication channel for messages and notifications, and a simple API for [...]

  37. Will Twitter follow Facebook as the new CASUAL GAMING hub? « It’s Game Time! Because Gaming is Serious Business! Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    [...] all, much like Facebook, Twitter offers the virality so vital to a social network, a name space and thumbnails, a communication channel for messages and notifications, and a simple API for [...]

  38. If you missed out getting your FB vanity name, get a .TEL instead @ http://www.mytel.me with your name at a cool domain.

  39. This is a good way to quickly access your friend’s Facebook or your own account. The URL is going to be very useful. I have no idea what you are talking about with “Facebook is blindly following failed Twitter.” Tell me your reasons or examples that Twitter is failing.

  40. MySpace New Email Looks Better Than Facebook Messaging Friday, July 31, 2009

    [...] do on Facebook. MySpace users who have already vanity URL (a feature Facebook just incorporated last month) have an email address reserved for them in the format: [...]

  41. Never thought of Twitter and Facebook as competitors

  42. i dont think at this moment. #1 I have a facebook page for one of my businesses (chloregy.com) and I can’t for the life of me figure out how to get facebook.com/chloregy for this group/page or whatever it’s called. it won’t let you change the name so we are stuck with a group name that includes a description, so when we (if we) start using facebook significantly and promote it we will need to create a brand new set of pages from scratch…

    i’m only 30, and i don’t claim to be an expert at anything, but some of this FB stuff looks like it was designed by an 18 year old with no real world experience and no user acceptance…

    i use twitter to keep a list of the most interesting articles on chloregy.com, it’s business oriented, people join just so they can get a “news wire” of what I think is important….. facebook for the most part will be a personal network with some minor business overlap still for some time to come. many of the people on FB i know are in totally different worlds then i am in. eventually the static from having 500+ friends like i see some people having will be a dead weight on that system…

    at that point u become a filter source of information

  43. Social Networks Friday, September 11, 2009

    [...] using the @ symbol, which closely resembles the “@ reply” function popular on Twitter (We predicted Facebook would make this move back in June.) The social network also said it was open sourcing Tornado, the web server framework that powers [...]

  44. Do Facebook Vanity URLs Equals Kill Twitter Vol. 2? | Disinformation Saturday, September 26, 2009

    [...] GO TO FULL STORY [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post