<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today, We Think Twitter Is Dead (for Now)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vreebit &#8211; A bit of what? &#124; Direct Sales News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vreebit &#8211; A bit of what? &#124; Direct Sales News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Today, We Think Twitter Is Dead (for Now)  (gigaom.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Today, We Think Twitter Is Dead (for Now)  (gigaom.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Twitter Post a Long Time in Coming &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This Twitter Post a Long Time in Coming &#171; SmoothSpan Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Om Malik on Twitter Hate:  There are no end of Twitter Hate stories.  The statistics on people joining and never using/leaving Twitter are horrendous.  This is simply a reflection of the high Value Friction.  If getting Value was easy for everyone, they would stay.  The low adoption friction means Om is right.  Twitter will bounce back and forth between Love (adoption) and Hate (value). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik on Twitter Hate:  There are no end of Twitter Hate stories.  The statistics on people joining and never using/leaving Twitter are horrendous.  This is simply a reflection of the high Value Friction.  If getting Value was easy for everyone, they would stay.  The low adoption friction means Om is right.  Twitter will bounce back and forth between Love (adoption) and Hate (value). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iranian Revolution Shocks Life into Twitter! &#124; Ryan's Biz Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iranian Revolution Shocks Life into Twitter! &#124; Ryan's Biz Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Many criticized Twitter and dismissed it as a fad that would simply pass over. As early as June 09, this insightful blog post called for the demise of twitter proving that traffic had flat-lined and the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many criticized Twitter and dismissed it as a fad that would simply pass over. As early as June 09, this insightful blog post called for the demise of twitter proving that traffic had flat-lined and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Datajunkie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Datajunkie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good read - I think it is safe to say that Twitter has slowed down, but also it is important to remember a few things when looking at Twitter data from compete.com or any of the measurement sites:

1) None of these sites account for traffic to any sites from mobile devices, so this is by no means the whole Twitter traffic story

2) Most regular Twitter users do not use twitter.com as their primary messaging vehicle - instead, they are using all sorts of desktop and mobile applications to tweet. So of course traffic to the Twitter domain will not continue to rise, even with increased engagement and twitter activity]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read &#8211; I think it is safe to say that Twitter has slowed down, but also it is important to remember a few things when looking at Twitter data from compete.com or any of the measurement sites:</p>
<p>1) None of these sites account for traffic to any sites from mobile devices, so this is by no means the whole Twitter traffic story</p>
<p>2) Most regular Twitter users do not use twitter.com as their primary messaging vehicle &#8211; instead, they are using all sorts of desktop and mobile applications to tweet. So of course traffic to the Twitter domain will not continue to rise, even with increased engagement and twitter activity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahab khan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shahab khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really don&#039;t know why twitter is not making any improvements in it like facebook with the passage of time. For instance just compare what facebook has done as compared to the twitter in the past three four months. They have redesigned facebook look and now a days they are offering personalised URLs too.  Seems that facebook is following this: &quot;Changes are better and getting better never stops&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t know why twitter is not making any improvements in it like facebook with the passage of time. For instance just compare what facebook has done as compared to the twitter in the past three four months. They have redesigned facebook look and now a days they are offering personalised URLs too.  Seems that facebook is following this: &#8220;Changes are better and getting better never stops&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Offers Vanity Addresses</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Offers Vanity Addresses]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] sites as LinkedIn, Twitter and MySpace have offered custom addresses for some time. With Facebook growing eight percent in May, it seemed inevitable that Facebook would join the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sites as LinkedIn, Twitter and MySpace have offered custom addresses for some time. With Facebook growing eight percent in May, it seemed inevitable that Facebook would join the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonal Maheshwari</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonal Maheshwari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Om

Another great post. Twitter saw a rush of users in first 4 months of 2009 but since then what i see daily most of it is useless. Twitter needs a serious change in business plan to keep avoiding a big problem in near future. Opinions and comments change over the time but the basic thing remains the same. Let us see how long this twitter bubble stays.

@Yatca
 You absolutely correct, i cross checked that thing. Good correction made :)


Sonal Maheshwari
USourceIT]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Om</p>
<p>Another great post. Twitter saw a rush of users in first 4 months of 2009 but since then what i see daily most of it is useless. Twitter needs a serious change in business plan to keep avoiding a big problem in near future. Opinions and comments change over the time but the basic thing remains the same. Let us see how long this twitter bubble stays.</p>
<p>@Yatca<br />
 You absolutely correct, i cross checked that thing. Good correction made :)</p>
<p>Sonal Maheshwari<br />
USourceIT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the #Twitpocalypse overhyped? &#124; Tech Space</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is the #Twitpocalypse overhyped? &#124; Tech Space]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for a 32-bit signed int.  You can view the countdown here.This got a also mention at GigaOM:  Today, We Think Think Twitter is Dead (for now).  While the Twitpocalypse was not the primary topic of the post, it made use of it as a supporting [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for a 32-bit signed int.  You can view the countdown here.This got a also mention at GigaOM:  Today, We Think Think Twitter is Dead (for now).  While the Twitpocalypse was not the primary topic of the post, it made use of it as a supporting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ironic But True. Many On Twitter Are Just Silent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ironic But True. Many On Twitter Are Just Silent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Malik  &#124; Wednesday, June 10, 2009 &#124; 5:00 AM PT &#124; 0 comments    Yesterday we heard from Harvard Business School researchers that only 10 percent of Twitter users are generating almost 90 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malik  | Wednesday, June 10, 2009 | 5:00 AM PT | 0 comments    Yesterday we heard from Harvard Business School researchers that only 10 percent of Twitter users are generating almost 90 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtual online worlds for kids</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[virtual online worlds for kids]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter is reeeeally pointless. more pointles than facebook. And you have to have to much free time to twit alot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is reeeeally pointless. more pointles than facebook. And you have to have to much free time to twit alot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David S</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much is said about twitter, about facebook and all that is our modern web.. but as you mentioned, take it at face value..  all these tools are just that.. TOOLS that you either benefit from or not.  Twitter for me seems more like a real-time broadcast tool.. I don&#039;t really see &quot;conversations&quot; going on too much (even on friendfeed for that matter).. I guess it is a sign of our human state too - lots of people shouting things out without a nice bit of silence to really listen and really think through things...

Anyway, maybe I am just getting old!   I do love the web, I love the tools... but they are just tools...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much is said about twitter, about facebook and all that is our modern web.. but as you mentioned, take it at face value..  all these tools are just that.. TOOLS that you either benefit from or not.  Twitter for me seems more like a real-time broadcast tool.. I don&#8217;t really see &#8220;conversations&#8221; going on too much (even on friendfeed for that matter).. I guess it is a sign of our human state too &#8211; lots of people shouting things out without a nice bit of silence to really listen and really think through things&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, maybe I am just getting old!   I do love the web, I love the tools&#8230; but they are just tools&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yatca

thanks for the clarification here. appreciate the distinction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yatca</p>
<p>thanks for the clarification here. appreciate the distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we aim to please dear sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we aim to please dear sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swag</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like ICQ, Twitter won&#039;t die so much as fade away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like ICQ, Twitter won&#8217;t die so much as fade away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today in Tech: Twitter Stops Growing (as much) &#124; adrianmott.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Today in Tech: Twitter Stops Growing (as much) &#124; adrianmott.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] based on the rampant growth that the service saw in the months prior. Om Malik over at GigaOm had some interesting ideas on this (actually going so far as to say &#8216;Twitter is dead&#8217;) including some description of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] based on the rampant growth that the service saw in the months prior. Om Malik over at GigaOm had some interesting ideas on this (actually going so far as to say &#8216;Twitter is dead&#8217;) including some description of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossi Ben Haroosh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/#comment-213439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yossi Ben Haroosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=53461#comment-213439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only way Twitter can stay alive is by allowing their users freedom of speech. The 140 character limit is their doom, they should allow 500 - Tweeti 500.
Watch the clip, it&#039;s hilarious:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7oqUfe5pug]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way Twitter can stay alive is by allowing their users freedom of speech. The 140 character limit is their doom, they should allow 500 &#8211; Tweeti 500.<br />
Watch the clip, it&#8217;s hilarious:<br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/09/twitter-is-dead/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/s7oqUfe5pug/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

