40 Comments

Summary:

I woke up this morning, checked the news and realized that I didn’t get the “Today, we think Twitter is dead” memo. Last week, Twitter was on the cover of Time magazine, deemed to be a life-defining technology. Today, Twitter is making gloomy headlines. Compete.com says […]

twitterdeadI woke up this morning, checked the news and realized that I didn’t get the “Today, we think Twitter is dead” memo. Last week, Twitter was on the cover of Time magazine, deemed to be a life-defining technology. Today, Twitter is making gloomy headlines.

  • Compete.com says Twitter’s growth flattened in May 2009, but Facebook’s grew 8 percent. Twitter was up only 1.47 percent to 19.7 million uniques for the month, after growing 40 percent in April (via).
  • BBC reports that according to a Harvard Business School study, only 10 percent of Twitter users generate more than 90 percent of the content. Is that a problem? Not particularly, if you ask me. On the social web the 80/20 rule — 80 percent consumers to 20 percent creators — is the norm.
  • Did you know that the Twitpocalypse is near? No, we are not all getting horribly addicted to tweeting, though ESPN jocks clearly are. Instead, there is a bug in the Twitter system that would be like Y2K. Apparently each tweet is identified by an integer value and the maximum signed 32-bit integer value for most database applications is 2,147,483,648. And since Twitter is getting so popular, we are inching close to that number. You can keep track of it here. Now if I remember correctly, the Y2K bug didn’t really cause any major havoc. Unless you blame it for bursting the dot-com bubble.

The best part about this bad news and today’s Twitter-hate: Next week, we the media will have forgotten all about this and will be writing happy (if totally) inane stories such as how Twitter is going to change the way we live. Oh wait, Time magazine already did that. Never mind.

If you want, you can follow me on Twitter @om. I promise to be among the 10 percent of people who create more than 90 percent of the content. But don’t expect me to be happy all the time.

  1. Are you flattering yourself, or did Nick Swisher from the NY Yankees really wrote this article?

    Share
    1. How about both :-D

      Share
    2. jokes aside, thanks for the heads up on the wrong link. appreciate your help.

      Share
      1. Any time!

        Share
  2. Let us wait till business discover some HIDDEN TREASURES in Twitter – which will be very soon, IMHO

    Share
    1. I really don’t know why twitter is not making any improvements in it like facebook with the passage of time. For instance just compare what facebook has done as compared to the twitter in the past three four months. They have redesigned facebook look and now a days they are offering personalised URLs too. Seems that facebook is following this: “Changes are better and getting better never stops”

      Share
  3. Carolyn Pritchard Tuesday, June 9, 2009

    @Robin, Om’s Twitter address is fixed :)

    thanks, best, Carolyn

    Share
  4. Om you NickRolled us today.

    Share
  5. Twitter? What’s that?

    Share
  6. >>only 10 percent of Twitter users generate more than 90 percent of the content.<>Signed 32-bit integer value for most database applications is 2,147,483,648. And since Twitter is getting so popular, we are inching close to that number<<

    Doesn't matter if they dump old tweets. No one really cares. Twitter is real time web. Anything beyond 1 week old (or may be 1 month who occasionally login) is a waste. No one look for old data.

    Share
  7. [...] tip to Om Malik!) Verfasst von wowo101 Eingeordnet unter Twitter Fail Keine Kommentare [...]

    Share
  8. Om, the Twitpocalypse is only going to affect third-party applications that user Twitter’s API, and only those that store tweets (posting wouldn’t be affected). Upgrading the database schema to accommodate the widget integer type is fairly trivial.

    Share
  9. OM – now can you tell us what you really think of the Twitter :-)

    Share
    1. I am not about judging Twitter. I take it at face value and don’t change my opinion about it. I made that call three years ago when I saw it for the first time – it was a new interaction tool. Nothing has changed my opinion, despite what the Time Magazine and nay sayers say. :-)

      Share
      1. So much is said about twitter, about facebook and all that is our modern web.. but as you mentioned, take it at face value.. all these tools are just that.. TOOLS that you either benefit from or not. Twitter for me seems more like a real-time broadcast tool.. I don’t really see “conversations” going on too much (even on friendfeed for that matter).. I guess it is a sign of our human state too – lots of people shouting things out without a nice bit of silence to really listen and really think through things…

        Anyway, maybe I am just getting old! I do love the web, I love the tools… but they are just tools…

        Share
  10. Om, you made my day with this post!

    Share
    1. we aim to please dear sir.

      Share

Comments have been disabled for this post