<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Interest In Cisco&#039;s Servers, Survey Says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Servers and Networking Come From a Single Source?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/#comment-212855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should Servers and Networking Come From a Single Source?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52784#comment-212855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] its current switch and router products, its most recent announcement includes support for 1U and 2U rack-mounted servers, the kind HP has been shipping for years, along with Dell, IBM, Supermicro, and many [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its current switch and router products, its most recent announcement includes support for 1U and 2U rack-mounted servers, the kind HP has been shipping for years, along with Dell, IBM, Supermicro, and many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco channel gameplan for expanding its data center footprint - Changing the Channel: Networking VAR news</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/#comment-212854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco channel gameplan for expanding its data center footprint - Changing the Channel: Networking VAR news]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52784#comment-212854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] touted these findings during various keynote presentations at the partner summit.  However, GigaOm pointed out, an &#8220;increased presence&#8221; for Cisco servers doens&#8217;t mean much since Cisco&#8217;s servers are just now hitting the market. Since the vast majority of companies [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] touted these findings during various keynote presentations at the partner summit.  However, GigaOm pointed out, an &#8220;increased presence&#8221; for Cisco servers doens&#8217;t mean much since Cisco&#8217;s servers are just now hitting the market. Since the vast majority of companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knujlla</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/#comment-212853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[knujlla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52784#comment-212853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Petabro It was Cisco&#039;s CTO that used the GS survey results in her presentation, not Stacey.
							BTW I love your blog!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Petabro It was Cisco&#8217;s CTO that used the GS survey results in her presentation, not Stacey.<br />
							BTW I love your blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knujlla</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/#comment-212852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[knujlla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52784#comment-212852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Petabro It was Cisco&#039;s CTO that used the GS survey results in her presentation, not Stacey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Petabro It was Cisco&#8217;s CTO that used the GS survey results in her presentation, not Stacey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petabro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/#comment-212851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petabro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52784#comment-212851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stacy,
Why do you use investment bank surveys?
I wonder how much Goldman will get paid for the next M&amp;A transaction they pitch to Cisco. Investment Bank surveys can be filed in the &quot;fiction&quot; pile.
If you called 5-10 of your IT contacts - you could have done a better job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacy,<br />
Why do you use investment bank surveys?<br />
I wonder how much Goldman will get paid for the next M&amp;A transaction they pitch to Cisco. Investment Bank surveys can be filed in the &#8220;fiction&#8221; pile.<br />
If you called 5-10 of your IT contacts &#8211; you could have done a better job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raghu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/#comment-212850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raghu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52784#comment-212850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear from my IT colleagues that this is a revolutionary game changing product with big cost savings opportunity...so, I&#039;m not surprised when I hear that 1 in 5 will be testing it over next year.

Btw, doen&#039;t Cisco call their blade servers as Unified Computing System....not Unified Communications, which is compltely different :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear from my IT colleagues that this is a revolutionary game changing product with big cost savings opportunity&#8230;so, I&#8217;m not surprised when I hear that 1 in 5 will be testing it over next year.</p>
<p>Btw, doen&#8217;t Cisco call their blade servers as Unified Computing System&#8230;.not Unified Communications, which is compltely different :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/#comment-212849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52784#comment-212849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: market penetration with just one server deployed in a data center?

How often, in data centers that rely on standardization to drive down cost and complexity,do you see people buying just ONE of anything? That&#039;s a non-sensical point as the number of times you see that happen will be very small.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: market penetration with just one server deployed in a data center?</p>
<p>How often, in data centers that rely on standardization to drive down cost and complexity,do you see people buying just ONE of anything? That&#8217;s a non-sensical point as the number of times you see that happen will be very small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/03/ciscos-servers-intrigue-it-execs/#comment-212848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52784#comment-212848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the write up - an important correction: Cisco&#039;s compute product line is Unified Computing, not Unified Communications.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the write up &#8211; an important correction: Cisco&#8217;s compute product line is Unified Computing, not Unified Communications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

