7 Comments

Summary:

YouTube today presented YouTube XL, a TV-optimized alternate layout for its site that runs through any web browser. Here’s a very short video demo, so you can get a look at what XL looks like on a big screen. Amid the bloggers’ heads and rapid typing, […]

YouTube today presented YouTube XL, a TV-optimized alternate layout for its site that runs through any web browser. Here’s a very short video demo, so you can get a look at what XL looks like on a big screen. Amid the bloggers’ heads and rapid typing, you get a view of an Android phone being used as a remote for XL, and HD video showing up full-screen.

Having returned home from the presser, I have a few more thoughts. Not to spend too much ink on this announcement — it’s just a browser version of YouTube, but the move of web delivery to the TV is one of the most important things we’re tracking. And upon reflection, I think YouTube’s lack of an aggressive take on the living room means a slowdown of that whole process. Bringing video to the TV is a matter of business development and marketing, and YouTube’s strategic revision indicates it’s divesting from that. Where in days gone by, it was busy signing Apple TV, HP MediaSmart, Verismo, Panasonic Viera…this year it seems to be saying, “Take it or leave it.”

It’s worth noting the limitations of the different approaches Hulu and YouTube have taken for the lean-back experience. Hulu Desktop, which also just came out, explicitly prohibits use in the living room, in the interest of protecting its content providers’ business models. So the new Hulu app is crippled and, in my opinion, not very compelling.

YouTube also has to deal with content licensing holdups to some extent, and XL is missing some premium content that’s only available online. But XL surfaces another limitation as we get closer to the living room. By choosing the browser as the delivery vehicle for online video, YouTube is pushing off mainstream usage until browser-enabled TVs become commonplace (at least two to three years, it says). Or, until folks go out and buy connector cords en masse.

I guess we shouldn’t expect to see any more glitzy CES presentations featuring YouTube, since the company said it will phase out TV-specific implementations via business development in favor of this open browser-based approach. But meanwhile, there’s an app store-ification of TVs and set-top boxes under way, with each platform trying to cultivate its own development. So this hands-off approach may mean YouTube gets pushed below the fold rather than prominently featured. YouTube is effectively removing itself as a prominent lobbyist for web content on TVs.

YouTube also reveals its expectation that XL will not be a massively popular product by leaving out ads entirely. The last people YouTube wants to anger are its loyal revenue-sharing partners, and if significant views started coming in through XL, you can bet they’d be pissed. So…we might want to take a rain check on this whole living room shebang.

  1. The other significant shortcoming of a browser-based solution is lack of a highly secure player. Without adequate security, content owners will never license premium content in full HD quality (on par with HD broadcast). Highly secure players are already being used in other applications, such as DVR to PC streaming of broadcast HD. I predict that the highest quality premium video content won’t be accessed in a browser… it will be accessed, managed, and enjoyed through a custom designed, highly secure PC application.

    Tom Vaughan
    Cyberlink

    Share
  2. The problems of profitability that has youtube, are known by all. This has forced Google to find multiple ways to bring money to your site. Bring the video online at the TV screen, is certainly an interesting possibility and more knowing that the number of people who watch TV still growing, as Nielsen reveals in his report “three screen”. Only time will show whether these changes can translate into money for Youtube.

    Share
  3. Steve Francis Tuesday, June 2, 2009

    YouTube has essentially said “we’re going to stop innovation” in how user generated content gets integrated into a TV experience, instead forcing a least-common-denominator approach via the TV browser. API’s let us integrate YouTube into a unified TV content experience — for example with aggregated search: delivering YouTube selections combined with search results from the standard television guide. It’s a sad step backward for the industry. It’s an opportunity for YouTube competitors to encourage innovation and take the TV market!

    Share
  4. youtube is not legal in some countries as turkey

    Share
  5. [...] YouTube XL: The Living Room Remodel Gets Delayed – Newteevee.comYouTube today presented YouTube XL, a TV-optimized alternate layout for its site that runs through any web browser. Here’s a very short video demo, so you can get a look at what XL looks like on a big screen. Amid the bloggers’ heads and rapid [...]

    Share
  6. youtube is not legal in some countries as turkey

    Share
  7. I think a half-hearted XL kind of makes sense since the initial content on the Shows page (their landing page for long-form TV shows) has been pretty abysmal. Check out my scathing review of the Shows page at http://greenscreencinema.com/article.php?story=20090605152604373

    Thanks!
    GreenScreenCinema.com

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post