<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InsideVenture Banks on New, Hybrid IPO Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/insideventure-banks-on-new-hybrid-ipo-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/insideventure-banks-on-new-hybrid-ipo-model/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Much is Twitter Worth? Less Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/insideventure-banks-on-new-hybrid-ipo-model/#comment-212720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Much is Twitter Worth? Less Than You Think]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52449#comment-212720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] NeXt Up&#8217;s research report is offered to users of SharesPost, a Santa Monica, Calif.-based private online exchange that allows the sale of shares of private companies to willing buyers. Most of their concern is coming from the lack of revenues and worries that any diversification [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NeXt Up&#8217;s research report is offered to users of SharesPost, a Santa Monica, Calif.-based private online exchange that allows the sale of shares of private companies to willing buyers. Most of their concern is coming from the lack of revenues and worries that any diversification [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could Facebook and Twitter Go Public?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/insideventure-banks-on-new-hybrid-ipo-model/#comment-212719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Could Facebook and Twitter Go Public?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52449#comment-212719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Recently, many startups and private exchanges have cropped up to help provide liquidity for startup shareholders. Earlier this week, a company called SharesPost announced its launch. The exchange, a private marketplace, saw 2,500 shares of Tesla Motors trade at $10 each, giving the company a $1 billion valuation. Inside Venture is another company that is trying to help solve the liquidity problem. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently, many startups and private exchanges have cropped up to help provide liquidity for startup shareholders. Earlier this week, a company called SharesPost announced its launch. The exchange, a private marketplace, saw 2,500 shares of Tesla Motors trade at $10 each, giving the company a $1 billion valuation. Inside Venture is another company that is trying to help solve the liquidity problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/insideventure-banks-on-new-hybrid-ipo-model/#comment-212718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52449#comment-212718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hybrid makes very little sense why will companies register to do this? They will go to existing secondary buyers before a &quot;hybrid offering&quot;. I don&#039;t think they have even done a deal in the direct market, so what makes inside ventures think this will work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hybrid makes very little sense why will companies register to do this? They will go to existing secondary buyers before a &#8220;hybrid offering&#8221;. I don&#8217;t think they have even done a deal in the direct market, so what makes inside ventures think this will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/insideventure-banks-on-new-hybrid-ipo-model/#comment-212717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52449#comment-212717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex, correct to some extend but OffRoad tried to create a new security instead of going with the traditional common stock offering if I recall properly; hence not really clearing the complexity of private company cap tables and preferrences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, correct to some extend but OffRoad tried to create a new security instead of going with the traditional common stock offering if I recall properly; hence not really clearing the complexity of private company cap tables and preferrences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/insideventure-banks-on-new-hybrid-ipo-model/#comment-212716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=52449#comment-212716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty cool. Many similarities to OffRoad Capital back in 2000. OffRoad had the right concept, but like the Apple Newton ahead of its time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty cool. Many similarities to OffRoad Capital back in 2000. OffRoad had the right concept, but like the Apple Newton ahead of its time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

