<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Gives Up on AOL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/05/28/time-warner-gives-up-on-aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/28/time-warner-gives-up-on-aol/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/28/time-warner-gives-up-on-aol/#comment-212131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51968#comment-212131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How was it TW&#039;s mistake when it was AOL that bought TW and not the other way around? I&#039;d argue it was a good move too, as what would AOL be worth today as a standalone company if they hadn&#039;t made that deal? The only mistake was that made by investors that didn&#039;t cash right after this acquisition -- it was a clear signal from AOL that they believed their stock to be overvalued.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How was it TW&#8217;s mistake when it was AOL that bought TW and not the other way around? I&#8217;d argue it was a good move too, as what would AOL be worth today as a standalone company if they hadn&#8217;t made that deal? The only mistake was that made by investors that didn&#8217;t cash right after this acquisition &#8212; it was a clear signal from AOL that they believed their stock to be overvalued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Leading Class and the Lagging Class on the Web</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/28/time-warner-gives-up-on-aol/#comment-212130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Leading Class and the Lagging Class on the Web]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51968#comment-212130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] None of these laggards will see a quick end. They&#8217;ll be able to endure for years serving the people who haven’t taken to Facebook or maybe tried and then abandoned Twitter, people who are comfortable with a simpler, more familiar experience on the web. But it’s an ever-shrinking crowd. A decade ago, AOL chose a complacent path by maintaining its gated online community, shunning the migration of content and services to the web itself. And look where AOL is today. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] None of these laggards will see a quick end. They&#8217;ll be able to endure for years serving the people who haven’t taken to Facebook or maybe tried and then abandoned Twitter, people who are comfortable with a simpler, more familiar experience on the web. But it’s an ever-shrinking crowd. A decade ago, AOL chose a complacent path by maintaining its gated online community, shunning the migration of content and services to the web itself. And look where AOL is today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Sleuth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/28/time-warner-gives-up-on-aol/#comment-212129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadget Sleuth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51968#comment-212129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eh,,,the company is old news these days, and with their spammy, polluted image, it&#039;ll be tough to do anything with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh,,,the company is old news these days, and with their spammy, polluted image, it&#8217;ll be tough to do anything with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make way for AOL &#124; iSawNEWS.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/28/time-warner-gives-up-on-aol/#comment-212128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Make way for AOL &#124; iSawNEWS.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51968#comment-212128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it will focus on three areas: content, advertising and social networking. But things haven&#8217;t exactly been rosy at AOL, revenue-wise. So for the time being, it gets to hold on to the access line business, which [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it will focus on three areas: content, advertising and social networking. But things haven&#8217;t exactly been rosy at AOL, revenue-wise. So for the time being, it gets to hold on to the access line business, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelSF</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/28/time-warner-gives-up-on-aol/#comment-212127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelSF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51968#comment-212127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a victim long ago of AOL&#039;s spam practices.  Then when I tried to cancel it took a year to get rid of them.  I had to eventually close the AmEx account and cancel the card that AOL was tapping.

That was in 1999.  Since then I have always hoped AOL would die a horrible death.  I am disappointed that the company still has 6 million subscribers.

Can&#039;t the FBI throw the company principals in prison for something?  Maybe for polluting the environment with those CD mailings?

Yeah, AOL certainly has a built a nice legacy.  &quot;You&#039;ve got mail&quot; my ass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a victim long ago of AOL&#8217;s spam practices.  Then when I tried to cancel it took a year to get rid of them.  I had to eventually close the AmEx account and cancel the card that AOL was tapping.</p>
<p>That was in 1999.  Since then I have always hoped AOL would die a horrible death.  I am disappointed that the company still has 6 million subscribers.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t the FBI throw the company principals in prison for something?  Maybe for polluting the environment with those CD mailings?</p>
<p>Yeah, AOL certainly has a built a nice legacy.  &#8220;You&#8217;ve got mail&#8221; my ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

