<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Online Recommendations, One Size Doesn&#8217;t Fit All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Pearson, Chief Customer Officer, richrelevance</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/#comment-961568</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Pearson, Chief Customer Officer, richrelevance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51558#comment-961568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I find Patricia’s post very interesting. As chief customer officer,  I’ve seen every deal that has passed through richrelevance, and I can say that every retailer who has tested our product suite against our competitors has gone on to select us as their partner. Also, an important point of clarification – we only offer only pay-for-performance pricing and have never offered a rate anything like that described in Patricia’s comment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Patricia’s post very interesting. As chief customer officer,  I’ve seen every deal that has passed through richrelevance, and I can say that every retailer who has tested our product suite against our competitors has gone on to select us as their partner. Also, an important point of clarification – we only offer only pay-for-performance pricing and have never offered a rate anything like that described in Patricia’s comment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Linford</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/#comment-959718</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Linford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51558#comment-959718</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Sites like Sears and Burton, which use more than one recommendation technique, have been able to boost sitewide sales by up to 30 percent over the long term&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As part of the e-commerce team of a large retailer, we decided we wanted to implement automated recommendations on our site. We looked at a number of players, among which Rich Relevance. We didn&#039;t select them because we did some bucket testing to compare their solution with two other vendors and felt they were better at marketing than at ecommerce.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If Mr. Vangroff&#039;s assertion is correct, (their solution increases sales by 30%) then why did they quote us a monthly price of $1,500? For an increase in sales by 30%, we&#039;d be happy to pay 10 or 100 times that price.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My intention is not to criticize Rich Relevance, (their impressive client base indicates that there must be some substance behind their claims), I just want to make sure that other ecommerce managers think carefully when selecting a recommendations vendor, and do not rely on promotional postings of this nature.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sites like Sears and Burton, which use more than one recommendation technique, have been able to boost sitewide sales by up to 30 percent over the long term&#8221;.</p>

<p>As part of the e-commerce team of a large retailer, we decided we wanted to implement automated recommendations on our site. We looked at a number of players, among which Rich Relevance. We didn&#8217;t select them because we did some bucket testing to compare their solution with two other vendors and felt they were better at marketing than at ecommerce.</p>

<p>If Mr. Vangroff&#8217;s assertion is correct, (their solution increases sales by 30%) then why did they quote us a monthly price of $1,500? For an increase in sales by 30%, we&#8217;d be happy to pay 10 or 100 times that price.</p>

<p>My intention is not to criticize Rich Relevance, (their impressive client base indicates that there must be some substance behind their claims), I just want to make sure that other ecommerce managers think carefully when selecting a recommendations vendor, and do not rely on promotional postings of this nature.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recomendações online: nem tudo é perfeito! &#171; Artificial Intelligence Applications</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/#comment-950031</link>
		<dc:creator>Recomendações online: nem tudo é perfeito! &#171; Artificial Intelligence Applications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51558#comment-950031</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Para mais detalhes sobre segmentação, colaboração, personalização e similaridade, leia o artigo do autor clicando aqui. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Para mais detalhes sobre segmentação, colaboração, personalização e similaridade, leia o artigo do autor clicando aqui. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analytics Team &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Different methods for online recommendation</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/#comment-949118</link>
		<dc:creator>Analytics Team &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Different methods for online recommendation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51558#comment-949118</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Darren Vengroff, chief scientist from RichRelevance, explains some of the components of a recommendation system in a GigaOM article. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darren Vengroff, chief scientist from RichRelevance, explains some of the components of a recommendation system in a GigaOM article. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amazingamazon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/#comment-947217</link>
		<dc:creator>amazingamazon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51558#comment-947217</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That was incredibly informative.  I finally understand what underlies these recommendation systems.  And it makes perfect sense to use the best technique in each particular situation rather than always using the same approach?  Why wouldn&#039;t all of the recommendation providers do this?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was incredibly informative.  I finally understand what underlies these recommendation systems.  And it makes perfect sense to use the best technique in each particular situation rather than always using the same approach?  Why wouldn&#8217;t all of the recommendation providers do this?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lotame Learnings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data driven targeting: Here are 4 approaches</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/#comment-947134</link>
		<dc:creator>Lotame Learnings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data driven targeting: Here are 4 approaches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51558#comment-947134</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] his blog post over at GigaOm entitled &#8220;One Size Doesn’t Fit All When It Comes To Online Recommendations,&#8221; Darren Vengroff writes about 4 different product recommendations approaches, all deeply [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his blog post over at GigaOm entitled &#8220;One Size Doesn’t Fit All When It Comes To Online Recommendations,&#8221; Darren Vengroff writes about 4 different product recommendations approaches, all deeply [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eee fff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/#comment-947126</link>
		<dc:creator>eee fff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51558#comment-947126</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This seems like an advertorial with ANY DISCLOSURE!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like an advertorial with ANY DISCLOSURE!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/27/one-size-doesnt-fit-all-when-it-comes-to-online-recommendations/#comment-947109</link>
		<dc:creator>Maddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=51558#comment-947109</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How to combine the techniques to create the best overall experience. After serving more than 20 billion product recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to combine the techniques to create the best overall experience. After serving more than 20 billion product recommendations.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
