10 Comments

Summary:

Copyright law wasn’t written with today’s content consumption in mind. The way online video copyright functions is based on a reading of the 10-year-old Digital Millennium Copyright Act that equates video hosting sites with Internet service providers. That law provides a “safe harbor” for hosts who […]

Copyright law wasn’t written with today’s content consumption in mind. The way online video copyright functions is based on a reading of the 10-year-old Digital Millennium Copyright Act that equates video hosting sites with Internet service providers. That law provides a “safe harbor” for hosts who respond to copyright claims by taking down infringing content “expeditiously.”

There doesn’t seem to be widespread motivation to modernize that process. Viacom is suing YouTube for $1 billion, claiming YouTube should take more responsibility than the current reading of DMCA requires — but that’s plodding along in the courts. Meanwhile, Internet users are sharing and consuming content at a furious rate. And what’s being called the “real-time web” is even less equipped to deal with copyright infringement.

Virality on Steroids

Today, when someone “tweets” a link to a video or posts an embedded clip on Facebook, their network of friends will see it almost instantly. Ustream CEO John Ham says he’s seen live video feeds go from zero to a million viewers faster than ever before after being shared on Facebook and Twitter. Those sites are quickly growing to account for major portions of traffic referrals all over the web. And as they, and others like FriendFeed, move to a live-updating stream of user data, people will only find content more quickly.

If you’re a copyright holder and you want to keep up with your pirated content flitting about the web — well, good luck. The way the DMCA is set up means you’re always chasing, and the real-time web is racing faster than ever before. Analytics services are only just emerging that will tell you where your views are coming from on a semi-real-time basis.

That’s especially true for live video streaming sites such as Ustream and Justin.tv. Justin.tv, in particular, has come under fire by sports leagues for hosting camcorded streams of live game broadcasts. The company says it takes down streams whenever it is asked to. But the reality is, often the moment has passed.

On the user side, the real-time web means we can’t possibly keep up with everything — some of us do have lives, after all — so the only time to reach us is the present. Twitmatic, a service by video recommendation company ffwd, recently added real-time Twitter video search. That means you can search for what videos are being shared on Twitter about a particular topic at any time. ffwd CEO Patrick Koppula told us this week that he has never once come upon a dead video on the service — meaning one that is no longer available because a copyright holder has made the host take it down. If a video does get taken down, it’s probably no longer relevant.

Taking on Real Time

So what can we be done? Today’s leaders of the world understandably have a few things higher on their lists than copyright reform. In the private sector, copyright monitoring companies like Vobile and Attributor record live TV broadcasts so they can track copies in real time; they’re the reason why you probably didn’t see any pirated clips of the Beijing Olympics on YouTube. They’re also working to perfect and sell services so rights holders can monetize unauthorized clips that go viral, turning those views into marketing and revenue. (See our extended feature on this topic.) Adoption of such programs is moving a lot faster than the law. But it’s not easy for people who start aligned as enemies to become friends. If sports leagues were to embrace Justin.tv as their viral marketing engine…well, that would be something.

Another live video company, Livestream (which until this week was called Mogulus), is trying to stand out from Justin.tv and Ustream by monitoring copyright more closely than DMCA requires. Livestream CEO Max Haot tells us his company has adopted aggressive copyright policies such as limiting new accounts to 50 concurrent viewers until they have been verified.

But one problem with tightening up on copyrighted content is the flip side of the DMCA. If you actively patrol new uploads, you’re no longer seen as a blind ISP, and could be held liable for copyright infringement. Letting a copyrighted upload through the cracks now becomes your responsibility, not the uploader’s.

Last year, when Sen. John McCain was running for U.S. president, he ran full-speed ahead into these conflicts. Fox News and CBS got upset when he used small portions of their broadcasts in online campaign ads, because they felt it implied endorsement. They used the DMCA to block the ads on YouTube, and for a time it looked like McCain’s anger at the 10- to 14-day DMCA appeal process might ignite a change in the law. Closely fought political battles, after all, move at the speed of real time as well. But alas, the world moved on, and the issue got dropped.

This article also appeared on BusinessWeek.com.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Copyright vs. the real time web…

    But here’s another idea: If people exchange those links via Twitter and Facebook, then why not concentrate on those sites instead of the streaming platforms?…

  2. Copyright and the Real Time Microblog Phenom : Beyond Search Saturday, May 23, 2009

    [...] a New Worth Foe: The Real Time Web” is an interesting article. You can find it on NewTeeVee.com here. Her point is that copyright, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and other bits and pieces of [...]

  3. Copyright Meets a New Worthy Foe: The Real-Time Web | Liz Gannes | Voices | AllThingsD Monday, May 25, 2009

    [...] Read the rest of this post on the original site Tagged: Internet, Voices, video, copyright, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Liz Gannes, New Tee Vee, online video | permalink Sphere.Inline.search("", "http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090525/copyright-meets-a-new-worthy-foe-the-real-time-web/"); « Previous Post [...]

  4. The Online Video Producer Blog Tuesday, May 26, 2009

    To solve the issue of the speed at which video spreads nowadays some video hosting sites seems to take a proactive action and block anything that look like it might be copyright infringement. The problem is that they now have an awful reputation of blocking a lot of quality legitimate content too (it happened to me). This means that the site gets shunned by uploaders and became an also ran…

  5. Technical blogs with pictures and videos » The Next Big Copyright Battle? The ‘Real-Time’ Web Wednesday, May 27, 2009

    [...] In reality, this should (again) demonstrate the silliness of copyright laws right now. The fact that merely walking past a TV while streaming video could be considered a copyright violation should be seen as a joke. It’s legal if I see it with my own eyes, but if I include a virtual eye that lets others see it as well… that’s infringement? Yet, there are already lawsuits over this sort of thing, and Liz Gannes at NewTeeVee has a thoughtful article wondering if copyright holders are going to start complaining that the DMCA is insufficient to deal with these sorts of situations. [...]

  6. Click World News » Blog Archive » The Next Big Copyright Battle? The ‘Real-Time’ Web Wednesday, May 27, 2009

    [...] Liz Gannes at NewTeeVee has a thoughtful article wondering if copyright holders are going to start complaining that the DMCA is insufficient to deal with these sorts of situations. As it stands now, the DMCA already goes too far in allowing someone to claim they are a copyright [...]

  7. [...] In reality, this should (again) demonstrate the silliness of copyright laws right now. The fact that merely walking past a TV while streaming video could be considered a copyright violation should be seen as a joke. It’s legal if I see it with my own eyes, but if I include a virtual eye that lets others see it as well… that’s infringement? Yet, there are already lawsuits over this sort of thing, and Liz Gannes at NewTeeVee has a thoughtful article wondering if copyright holders are going to start complaining that the DMCA is insufficient …. [...]

  8. Whoa… this site is pretty awesome :) your layout is really well designed, and your blogs are (judging from what i’ve read) very interesting. heehee… consider yourself favorited. :-P

  9. Justin.tv Placates Copyright Holders With Anti-piracy Tech Wednesday, August 12, 2009

    [...] protections have been a challenge for the real-time web and an iterative process for Justin.tv. The company had previously instituted a takedown mechanism [...]

  10. House Committee Takes on Live-streaming Piracy Tuesday, December 15, 2009

    [...] like Justin.tv and its competitors, among them Ustream and Stickam. In fact, our own Liz Gannes argued previously that live streaming is challenging existing copyright laws, including the DMCA’s safe harbor [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post