7 Comments

Summary:

Last week Congress delayed the confirmation hearings for Julius Genachowski, who was nominated as the new chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, until after the Memorial Day congressional recess. Apparently there’s some political wrangling happening here because traditionally the Republican nominees are also in place for […]

julius-genachowski-thumb1Last week Congress delayed the confirmation hearings for Julius Genachowski, who was nominated as the new chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, until after the Memorial Day congressional recess. Apparently there’s some political wrangling happening here because traditionally the Republican nominees are also in place for the confirmation hearings so the new FCC can get down to business right away. However, there are no Republican nominees yet, hence the delay. What, there isn’t anyone as qualified as previous commissioner Deborah “I-issue-press-releases-about-the -sodium-content-in-canned-soups” Tate? I find that hard to believe.

Meanwhile, in the months since Genachowski has seen his name floated as top choice, and we issued our recommendations for his tenure:

If we all accept that broadband will be the platform for future innovation, then Washington is currently wasting time issuing decrees about the appropriate name for swine flu when it should be pushing for Republican nominees and getting a new FCC in place to start tackling some of these issues before we move further behind as a country. The deadline for a national broadband plan is next February, for crying out loud.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. I doubt this is as politically motivated as you think. It’s likely more of a “delay the approval longer so we can keep our constituents (ISPs) happy and, by association, our bank accounts full”.

    Essentially we need not just the government involved, but the people too… most people in Congress aren’t going to alienate those that keep them rich without good cause, and the FCC has a history of rolling over for whoever has the biggest bank account.

    It’s time to stand up for your digital selves, America.

    –Kyle

  2. Gadget Sleuth Tuesday, May 12, 2009

    Kyle: Yep, we need an FCC chief with actual guts and not just a figurehead who rolls over for companies with clout and money.

  3. FCC Makes Phone Number Portability Happen In One Day | MyPhillyNetwork Wednesday, May 13, 2009

    [...] We Need an FCC Chief and We Need Him Now (gigaom.com) [...]

  4. Time Warner Cable Adds Tier-Friendly Terms to its Contracts Saturday, May 30, 2009

    [...] own VoIP services over competitors’ also running on the cable network. We can’t get a new FCC chief soon enough. [...]

  5. FCC Confirmation Hearings Set for June 16 Wednesday, June 10, 2009

    [...] fund reform and the formulation of a nationwide broadband plan. The commission has been in a holding pattern as it waited for its new chairman to be [...]

  6. How to Grill a Potential FCC Nominee Friday, June 12, 2009

    [...] they believe should be asked of the potential nominees to the Federal Communications Commission. Following a delay in May, the Commerce Committee plans to open confirmation hearings on Tuesday for two of the potential [...]

  7. It’s Official: Julius Genachowski Is FCC Chair Thursday, June 25, 2009

    [...] funds for broadband before the end of the month, and could use some FCC guidance, Genachowski can’t get on the job fast enough. Also today, President Obama nominated Meredith Attwell Baker to one of the two open FCC spots. The [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post