<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Via Licensing Pushes LTE Patent Pool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/05/08/via-licensing-pushes-lte-patent-pool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/08/via-licensing-pushes-lte-patent-pool/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New LTE Patent Pool attempt &#124; Penny Wireless Mobile Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/08/via-licensing-pushes-lte-patent-pool/#comment-210291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New LTE Patent Pool attempt &#124; Penny Wireless Mobile Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 09:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=48955#comment-210291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and near field communications (NFC). The company is a spin-out from Dolby Laboratories Inc.   Via can’t force patent holders to play, and without a majority of solid patents with which to negotiate, its attempts will fail. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and near field communications (NFC). The company is a spin-out from Dolby Laboratories Inc.   Via can’t force patent holders to play, and without a majority of solid patents with which to negotiate, its attempts will fail. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LTE Is Too Cool for Pools</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/08/via-licensing-pushes-lte-patent-pool/#comment-210290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LTE Is Too Cool for Pools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=48955#comment-210290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] patents around the MPEG-2 video standard, and competes with Via Licensing, which last week created its own patent pool effort for LTE. The problem is, I just don&#8217;t think these &#8212; or even an earlier pooling effort &#8212; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] patents around the MPEG-2 video standard, and competes with Via Licensing, which last week created its own patent pool effort for LTE. The problem is, I just don&#8217;t think these &#8212; or even an earlier pooling effort &#8212; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/08/via-licensing-pushes-lte-patent-pool/#comment-210289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=48955#comment-210289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like reduce the rates on cell equipment in exchange for listening in on conversations so they can sell keyword ads to be played during your calls? Unfortunately, nothing is free, even when it looks like it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like reduce the rates on cell equipment in exchange for listening in on conversations so they can sell keyword ads to be played during your calls? Unfortunately, nothing is free, even when it looks like it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason nadaf</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/05/08/via-licensing-pushes-lte-patent-pool/#comment-210288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jason nadaf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=48955#comment-210288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i wish a company like Google would buy Qualcomm. they&#039;d figure out a way to monetize without  enforcing costs that affect the end consumer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish a company like Google would buy Qualcomm. they&#8217;d figure out a way to monetize without  enforcing costs that affect the end consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

