Being someone who develops websites, I dislike its way of working, its slight speed seems to be gained by ignoring vast sections of code and just doing what it feels like. Spending ages and ages trying to make a site loaded onto it look the same as on any of the other major browsers is a annoying and often futile act. Chrome is a much better choice for alternative browser in my opinion. So far, pages developed for it load as they should but with advanced speed. Maybe all the extra use is developers spending days trying to get things to load as they should.
The figures seem Strange, it lacks solitaire. And notpad
If the figures are created from usage, does that mean it is from new instances of programs? If that is so word proccesing applications and other programs that stay open for a long time such as world of warcraft shall provide lower percentages than ones such as web browsers, where it is constantly closed and opened for new windows.

Perhaps using the stats from the one site, but also including similar stats from other places on the web would make a stronger statement. Maybe he could have used stats from timmyjohnboy.com! (j/k)

Another option would using another post title. Maybe “Facebook, Firefox, Twitter Lead App, Wakoopa User Usage”

Firefox? *Some* folks (but not all) “I’ve heard of it.”

Facebook? “Isn’t that the place where lechers hang out seducing teenage girls?”

Twitter? “Isn’t that where people type what time they’re going out to have coffee?”

The figures lack a certain real-world basis.