<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Phorm Help Draft Privacy Rules In the UK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/04/28/did-phorm-help-draft-privacy-rules-in-the-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/28/did-phorm-help-draft-privacy-rules-in-the-uk/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NebuAd Technology Resurrected As InsightReady</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/28/did-phorm-help-draft-privacy-rules-in-the-uk/#comment-209421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NebuAd Technology Resurrected As InsightReady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47574#comment-209421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the company&#8217;s technology to the UK from the U.S. is likely a result of the region&#8217;s more lax enforcement regime and the lawsuits NebuAd is facing in the U.S. In November, customers from some of the ISPs that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company&#8217;s technology to the UK from the U.S. is likely a result of the region&#8217;s more lax enforcement regime and the lawsuits NebuAd is facing in the U.S. In November, customers from some of the ISPs that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/28/did-phorm-help-draft-privacy-rules-in-the-uk/#comment-209420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47574#comment-209420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Er, you&#039;ve reported twice now that the EU has taken legal action against Phorm. That would be nice, but it&#039;s not true - the EU has taken legal action against the UK itself, for failing to properly apply data protection principles in defence of its citizens.

That legal action was inspired by Phorm&#039;s secret trials on BT&#039;s customers in 2006 and 2007, and in particular the UK government&#039;s failure to censure Phorm and BT for that, but it&#039;s not legal action against Phorm itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, you&#8217;ve reported twice now that the EU has taken legal action against Phorm. That would be nice, but it&#8217;s not true &#8211; the EU has taken legal action against the UK itself, for failing to properly apply data protection principles in defence of its citizens.</p>
<p>That legal action was inspired by Phorm&#8217;s secret trials on BT&#8217;s customers in 2006 and 2007, and in particular the UK government&#8217;s failure to censure Phorm and BT for that, but it&#8217;s not legal action against Phorm itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

