2 Comments

Summary:

Talk about the fox guarding the hen house. Britain’s Home Office is accused of collusion with former spyware vendor Phorm after emails surfaced showing the department seeking Phorm’s approval for the UK’s targeted advertising rules, the BBC reported this morning. That revelation came just one day […]

Talk about the fox guarding the hen house. Britain’s Home Office is accused of collusion with former spyware vendor Phorm after emails surfaced showing the department seeking Phorm’s approval for the UK’s targeted advertising rules, the BBC reported this morning. That revelation came just one day after The Telegraph wrote about Phorm making personal attacks against privacy advocates who are waging a campaign against the company’s technology.

Phorm is in trials with several ISPs to use its deep-packet inspection technology to sell advertising based on the sites a user visits on the Internet. Its technology is similar to that offered by NebuAd here in the U.S. Phorm is trying to push its technology to North American ISPs as well.

But privacy advocates are enraged by the idea that an ISP can monitor a person’s surfing habits, especially if the consumer is unaware that such technology is being used. The European Commission is taking legal action against Phorm for invasion of privacy tied to a Phorm technology trial that BT conducted without obtaining subscribers’ consent. The EC argues that the Home Office’s scrutiny on the privacy issues were too lax, which is why these emails between the Home Office and Phorm are proving so inflammatory.

The BBC reports that officials in Brittan’s Home Office, which regulates privacy, worked with Phorm to draft the rules that Phorm would eventually have to follow. From the story:

In January 2008 the Home Office thanks Phorm for comments and changes to its draft paper, which show the company making deletions and changes to the document.

The Home Office official wrote to Phorm: “If we agree this, and this becomes our position do you think your clients and their prospective partners will be comforted.”

Phorm CEO Kent Ertugrul told the BBC that the company was seeking advice on privacy from the Home Office, and that the courts would decide whether or not any laws had been broken. For what it’s worth, this doesn’t look good for Phorm, but it’s also no different than the variety of scandals we have here in the U.S. with lobbyists writing legislation on behalf of various federal and municipal legislators.

  1. Er, you’ve reported twice now that the EU has taken legal action against Phorm. That would be nice, but it’s not true – the EU has taken legal action against the UK itself, for failing to properly apply data protection principles in defence of its citizens.

    That legal action was inspired by Phorm’s secret trials on BT’s customers in 2006 and 2007, and in particular the UK government’s failure to censure Phorm and BT for that, but it’s not legal action against Phorm itself.

    Share
  2. [...] the company’s technology to the UK from the U.S. is likely a result of the region’s more lax enforcement regime and the lawsuits NebuAd is facing in the U.S. In November, customers from some of the ISPs that [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post