<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brocade Pokes Cisco in the Eye, Switches for IBM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Will Buy Brocade?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/#comment-209290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who Will Buy Brocade?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47399#comment-209290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Big Blue has an OEM deal with Brocade whereby it resells Brocade storage and switching gear under IBM&#8217;s brand &#8212; a deal that was expanded shortly after Cisco made its foray into the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big Blue has an OEM deal with Brocade whereby it resells Brocade storage and switching gear under IBM&#8217;s brand &#8212; a deal that was expanded shortly after Cisco made its foray into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dell Teams Up With Brocade to Tackle Cisco&#8217;s Vision for Computing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/#comment-209289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dell Teams Up With Brocade to Tackle Cisco&#8217;s Vision for Computing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47399#comment-209289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this summer with Juniper, another network gear maker. IBM also has a deal to resell and brand Brocade switches under its name. Dell executives said in a call today that the fruits of this partnership are aimed at higher-end [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this summer with Juniper, another network gear maker. IBM also has a deal to resell and brand Brocade switches under its name. Dell executives said in a call today that the fruits of this partnership are aimed at higher-end [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back From the Pile: Interesting Content From the Week of May 2, 2009 &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/#comment-209288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Back From the Pile: Interesting Content From the Week of May 2, 2009 &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47399#comment-209288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Brocade Pokes Cisco in the Eye, Switches for IBM - A great headline and solid reporting by Om Malik on one of the first reactions to Cisco UCS [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brocade Pokes Cisco in the Eye, Switches for IBM - A great headline and solid reporting by Om Malik on one of the first reactions to Cisco UCS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/#comment-209287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pablo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47399#comment-209287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the clash was inevitable. it is not the networking cabinet that is the interesting battle, it is touching the business process that is. there is a *huge* services industry build around aligning technology infrastructure (hardware and applications) to optimally support the business process. *that* is the IBM and HP crown jewel, being a trusted consultant to the CIO.

but things are changing - networks are becoming more important, the flow of information is now just as important as its safe location. business intelligence is dreived from that flow. thus the clash between the traditional enterprise technology stalwarts (IBM, HP. MSFT) and Cisco (as the latter pacman&#039;d its way up the stack) was a long time coming.

let them al try to battle Cisco when it comes to networking. the *really* interesting battle however will be if Cisco can carve itself a niche touching the business process with its software.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the clash was inevitable. it is not the networking cabinet that is the interesting battle, it is touching the business process that is. there is a *huge* services industry build around aligning technology infrastructure (hardware and applications) to optimally support the business process. *that* is the IBM and HP crown jewel, being a trusted consultant to the CIO.</p>
<p>but things are changing &#8211; networks are becoming more important, the flow of information is now just as important as its safe location. business intelligence is dreived from that flow. thus the clash between the traditional enterprise technology stalwarts (IBM, HP. MSFT) and Cisco (as the latter pacman&#8217;d its way up the stack) was a long time coming.</p>
<p>let them al try to battle Cisco when it comes to networking. the *really* interesting battle however will be if Cisco can carve itself a niche touching the business process with its software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uday Subbarayan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/#comment-209286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uday Subbarayan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47399#comment-209286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be interesting to watch how the (innovation in )networking space evolves in next 4-5 years as Cisco is loosing it&#039;s focus... It might even create another startup boom in networking like late 90&#039;s...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to watch how the (innovation in )networking space evolves in next 4-5 years as Cisco is loosing it&#8217;s focus&#8230; It might even create another startup boom in networking like late 90&#8242;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/#comment-209285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47399#comment-209285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would HP (or any Brocade buyer) deal with the revenue leakage? Brocade
&#039;s three largest customers are HPQ, EMC and IBM.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would HP (or any Brocade buyer) deal with the revenue leakage? Brocade<br />
&#8216;s three largest customers are HPQ, EMC and IBM&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/#comment-209284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47399#comment-209284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet HP goes on a buying binge soon enough. We outlined a list of companies HP can buy. Why not Brocade to start with :-) Riverbed is another one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet HP goes on a buying binge soon enough. We outlined a list of companies HP can buy. Why not Brocade to start with :-) Riverbed is another one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rohit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/27/do-not-pub-ibm-brocade/#comment-209283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rohit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=47399#comment-209283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...so what is HP going to do?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;so what is HP going to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

