<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Full Analysis of the $7.4B Oracle-Sun Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prasad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;a bigbang gonna happen in IT.....
i can see brightest future of JAVA.....&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a bigbang gonna happen in IT&#8230;..<br />
i can see brightest future of JAVA&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;software compnay is becoming a hardware company ( add operational cost )&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can oracle feed Sun ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oracle shareholders will decide&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>software compnay is becoming a hardware company ( add operational cost )</p>
<p>Can oracle feed Sun ?</p>
<p>Oracle shareholders will decide</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 12:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could you please give us your take on the possible impact to MySQL and OpenOffice as  I note with interest you are likely the only qualified participant in this forum ?
Any &quot;clues&quot; would be received with the greatest of interest.

Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please give us your take on the possible impact to MySQL and OpenOffice as  I note with interest you are likely the only qualified participant in this forum ?<br />
Any &#8220;clues&#8221; would be received with the greatest of interest.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 12:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would you not put it on MySQL?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you not put it on MySQL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 11:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting perspectives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting perspectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what does OM stand for wow]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what does OM stand for wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gajju</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gajju]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I think you apprehensions could be grossly misplaced. Experts would say that Oracle has already proved itself in the M&amp;A domain, and this has been THE most important part for its growth strategy. In the last 4 years, it has bought nearly 50 companies, spending around $40 bn (including Sun). Although, many of these companies were small in size, they had focused and successful products. Then there were big acquisitions like PeopleSoft (along came JD Edw), Siebel, Heyperion, RETEK, BEA, I-flex, etc. The result? Oracle is already 3 times of what it used to be 4 years back, please wait for some more time, with Sun, it would grow even more.

If the other companies (like Lucent, as mentioned by you) have failed, it does not mean Oracle would follow suit. I wonder if you really have their shares :), it has the buy tag for a long time and even as most of the rivals are running half of their prices, Oracle&#039;s shares are not doing that bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think you apprehensions could be grossly misplaced. Experts would say that Oracle has already proved itself in the M&amp;A domain, and this has been THE most important part for its growth strategy. In the last 4 years, it has bought nearly 50 companies, spending around $40 bn (including Sun). Although, many of these companies were small in size, they had focused and successful products. Then there were big acquisitions like PeopleSoft (along came JD Edw), Siebel, Heyperion, RETEK, BEA, I-flex, etc. The result? Oracle is already 3 times of what it used to be 4 years back, please wait for some more time, with Sun, it would grow even more.</p>
<p>If the other companies (like Lucent, as mentioned by you) have failed, it does not mean Oracle would follow suit. I wonder if you really have their shares :), it has the buy tag for a long time and even as most of the rivals are running half of their prices, Oracle&#8217;s shares are not doing that bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solexy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[solexy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[really, now on site mysql logo have 2 part mysql and sun]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really, now on site mysql logo have 2 part mysql and sun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron from NJ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron from NJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle is going to support MySQL. There are 2 key drivers.

1) they own the database engine that MySQL uses &amp; see the core install base of MySQL of millions of databases as a core customer base to be harvested as 10% of those will need a Oracle DB sometime in the future.

2) MySQL gives Oracle a real MS Access like database &amp; entry level SQL Server &quot;like&quot; that Oracle standard edition has never become in 15 years of pushing Oracle Personal edition to basic Oracle database

I think the open source model is going to change as Oracle buys open source tool vendors and creates its own enterprise stack &amp; open source stack. This is key in attacking the Microsoft space. Oracle goes after Microsoft with OpenSource &amp; IBM with its Oracle Enterprise Stack. It will take 5-10 more mergers for them to pull this off but it makes sense.

The key is OpenSource system management is weak as a stack play and Oracle can sell OEM &amp; their future system mgmt.  stack as a way to manage OpenSource. It gives them a way to sell 10-50k licenses of OEM for OpenSource over the next 5 years to Opensource buyers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle is going to support MySQL. There are 2 key drivers.</p>
<p>1) they own the database engine that MySQL uses &amp; see the core install base of MySQL of millions of databases as a core customer base to be harvested as 10% of those will need a Oracle DB sometime in the future.</p>
<p>2) MySQL gives Oracle a real MS Access like database &amp; entry level SQL Server &#8220;like&#8221; that Oracle standard edition has never become in 15 years of pushing Oracle Personal edition to basic Oracle database</p>
<p>I think the open source model is going to change as Oracle buys open source tool vendors and creates its own enterprise stack &amp; open source stack. This is key in attacking the Microsoft space. Oracle goes after Microsoft with OpenSource &amp; IBM with its Oracle Enterprise Stack. It will take 5-10 more mergers for them to pull this off but it makes sense.</p>
<p>The key is OpenSource system management is weak as a stack play and Oracle can sell OEM &amp; their future system mgmt.  stack as a way to manage OpenSource. It gives them a way to sell 10-50k licenses of OEM for OpenSource over the next 5 years to Opensource buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorne Cooper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorne Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-for-74-billion/#comment-168072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can imagine them  putting an Oracle backend on MySQL and trying to move the MySQL companies to their &quot;accelerator&quot;.  MySQL has always been more about &quot;free as in beer&quot;, than &quot;free as in freedom&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can imagine them  putting an Oracle backend on MySQL and trying to move the MySQL companies to their &#8220;accelerator&#8221;.  MySQL has always been more about &#8220;free as in beer&#8221;, than &#8220;free as in freedom&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
