8 Comments

Summary:

A month after Cisco unveiled its Unified Computing System, it has finally released pricing, processing power and memory details. The bottom line is this: the performance of the servers and overall system seem to be in line with competing products from HP and IBM built on […]

A month after Cisco unveiled its Unified Computing System, it has finally released pricing, processing power and memory details. The bottom line is this: the performance of the servers and overall system seem to be in line with competing products from HP and IBM built on Intel’s latest Xeon 5500 chips, but Cisco’s offerings have more than twice the memory. That’s essential, because the goal of the Cisco box is to take virtualization to the next level.

Each system maxes out at 320 blades that have access to 384 GB of memory, compared to about 144 GB in a typical high-memory server configuration. Cisco’s blades use that extra memory to virtualize as much as possible. In addition to virtualizing the hardware so software can be abstracted, Cisco is now trying to virtualize the networking interface so the hardware can talk to whatever device it needs to on the network without manual intervention from the IT staff and a lot of cabling. In the process, Cisco has abstracted the firmware and network cards associated with each of its blades.

Adding memory helps the blades (and the overall system) keep track of a highly virtualized environment, and maintains performance in line with existing server hardware. In general, the more memory you add, the more it slows down the processor, because the processor has to figure out which memory card to get data from. To counteract that problem Cisco has also built its own chip that works with the Intel CPU to access all of that memory without taking a performance hit.

Cisco’s innovations around virtualization with the Unified Computing System are a big deal for data centers dealing with an ever increasing mess of servers, switches, cables and storage equipment, because it offers all of these units in one package. Whether or not Cisco can sell this box to traditional IT buyers is another matter, but the offering itself looks pretty intriguing.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. its waste of money …………….why dont people just write distributed app on commodity hardware based on software grid platform (lots of open source option ) ………..there is lot what level you can achieve with sw based grids ……does high end hardware even matters !! Believe me no needs high end commodity for high performance computing and redundancy ………look at hodoop , mosix , beowulf ,gridgain , globas etc

  2. its end to end cisco.

    That means I have to buy cisco networking / servers / management. Oh I get twice as much memory? wow.

    Then tell me how much the support costs..

  3. Xsigo Raises Money for Virtual I/O Wednesday, June 3, 2009

    [...] includes virtualized I/O in its new blade servers, as do other server vendors. 3Leaf Systems and Blade Network Technologies are also trying to offer [...]

  4. Technical blogs with pictures and videos » Xsigo Raises Money for Virtual I/O Wednesday, June 3, 2009

    [...] includes virtualized I/O in its new blade servers, as do other server vendors. 3Leaf Systems and Blade Network Technologies are also trying to offer [...]

  5. Virtualized I/O Takes Cloud Computing to the Next Level Monday, July 20, 2009

    [...] This, combined with gear from Sun’s Fishworks effort, has allowed PrimaCloud to virtualize its storage, networking and hardware — saving it money and boosting reliability said Eric Novikoff, COO of Enki, which built PrimaCloud. The completely virtualized computing infrastructure, and creations of these three clouds, is an example of the next big change sweeping computing. Most clouds right now rely on virtualized hardware and some virtualized storage — virtualized networks are the next focus. [...]

  6. VirtenSys Gets $16M for Virtual I/O Tuesday, August 11, 2009

    [...] external virtual I/O switches from Xsigo (which also recently raised money), Netirion and Next I/O. Cisco Systems and HP also make gear that provides virtualized [...]

  7. BLADE Network Rides OEM Deals to $230M Valuation Wednesday, September 9, 2009

    [...] grow as cloud and cloud-like computing start to take hold in data centers. Cisco’s UCS servers come in blade form, as does IBM’s CloudBurst [...]

  8. The Economics of Servers Could Soon Change: Tech News « Monday, November 8, 2010

    [...] cloud computing are demanding specialized hardware and more vertically integrated products such as Cisco’s servers or IBM’s CloudBurst gear. For those pushing the computing envelope, could ARM and a new wave [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post