<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psycuity: Using Psychometric Measurement To Build Teams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/psycuity-building-teams-with-business-psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/psycuity-building-teams-with-business-psychology/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Dzurilla</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/psycuity-building-teams-with-business-psychology/#comment-81660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawn Dzurilla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=7281#comment-81660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Psychometric testing is justifiable and compelling.  Investors in cleantech and renewable energy firms intend to build and secure world-class leadership teams.  The pursuit of excellence in management selection is a sustaining process which Gaia Human Capital Consultants recognizes as essential to the health and prosperity of any organization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psychometric testing is justifiable and compelling.  Investors in cleantech and renewable energy firms intend to build and secure world-class leadership teams.  The pursuit of excellence in management selection is a sustaining process which Gaia Human Capital Consultants recognizes as essential to the health and prosperity of any organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Smith</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/psycuity-building-teams-with-business-psychology/#comment-81659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=7281#comment-81659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You only got 95% in a test about yourself?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You only got 95% in a test about yourself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billbennettnz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/psycuity-building-teams-with-business-psychology/#comment-81658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billbennettnz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=7281#comment-81658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One problem with psychometric tests is they can be scammed.

Of course, attempting to scam the tests is not wise -- you could get caught. I wrote about it here:

See http://is.gd/svvb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem with psychometric tests is they can be scammed.</p>
<p>Of course, attempting to scam the tests is not wise &#8212; you could get caught. I wrote about it here:</p>
<p>See <a href="http://is.gd/svvb" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/svvb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran Ali</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/psycuity-building-teams-with-business-psychology/#comment-81657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imran Ali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=7281#comment-81657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your sharing your experiences - interesting I&#039;d never considered the &#039;past performance is not indicative of future results&#039; angle.

There&#039;re some ethics that need to be ironed out to safeguard against discrimination, but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s insurmountable.

( BTW, Celine&#039;s just posted a related article on running meetings with virtual teams -  http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/04/13/how-to-plan-virtual-meetings-with-a-global-teleworking-team/ )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your sharing your experiences &#8211; interesting I&#8217;d never considered the &#8216;past performance is not indicative of future results&#8217; angle.</p>
<p>There&#8217;re some ethics that need to be ironed out to safeguard against discrimination, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s insurmountable.</p>
<p>( BTW, Celine&#8217;s just posted a related article on running meetings with virtual teams &#8211;  <a href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/04/13/how-to-plan-virtual-meetings-with-a-global-teleworking-team/" rel="nofollow">http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/04/13/how-to-plan-virtual-meetings-with-a-global-teleworking-team/</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.Marx</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/psycuity-building-teams-with-business-psychology/#comment-81656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C.Marx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=7281#comment-81656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We ran through Meyers/Briggs at my 9-5 job as a way to make us better consultants to internal stakeholders (aka - how to be more valuable to our co-workers).  The results, like those of Psycuity, were right on.  We learned to work better with one another and understand the frequent disconnect in the team.

So after all of this I went up to the host of the event, and asked the natural question.  &quot;Can we use this to build a better team&quot;.  The answer was, not really.  First of all, these tests gauge past performance and preferences, not ability to succeed in the future.  Opposites attract after all.  Also, it may be considered discrimination to hire someone based on a personality test.

That said, in one of my 5 interviews several years ago at the same company, a high-level executive did pass me a personality test.  I took it on-site &quot;for fun&quot;, and was soon hired.  Illegal or not, it happens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We ran through Meyers/Briggs at my 9-5 job as a way to make us better consultants to internal stakeholders (aka &#8211; how to be more valuable to our co-workers).  The results, like those of Psycuity, were right on.  We learned to work better with one another and understand the frequent disconnect in the team.</p>
<p>So after all of this I went up to the host of the event, and asked the natural question.  &#8220;Can we use this to build a better team&#8221;.  The answer was, not really.  First of all, these tests gauge past performance and preferences, not ability to succeed in the future.  Opposites attract after all.  Also, it may be considered discrimination to hire someone based on a personality test.</p>
<p>That said, in one of my 5 interviews several years ago at the same company, a high-level executive did pass me a personality test.  I took it on-site &#8220;for fun&#8221;, and was soon hired.  Illegal or not, it happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
