<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming Soon, Yet Another Re-Org at Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup: MySpace history, Silicon Valley gloom, and more &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roundup: MySpace history, Silicon Valley gloom, and more &#187; VentureBeat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PaidContent has more.  Yahoo may announce layoffs as part of Bartz-driven reorganization &#8212; As GigaOm and The New York Times (and BoomTown) have [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PaidContent has more.  Yahoo may announce layoffs as part of Bartz-driven reorganization &#8212; As GigaOm and The New York Times (and BoomTown) have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo should layoff everyone in customer support.  I know, shocking to hear they actually have support.  Well they do, and they are NOT at all helpful (the service rep even admitted it).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo should layoff everyone in customer support.  I know, shocking to hear they actually have support.  Well they do, and they are NOT at all helpful (the service rep even admitted it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itrader news &#187; Roundup: MySpace history, Silicon Valley gloom, and more</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itrader news &#187; Roundup: MySpace history, Silicon Valley gloom, and more]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PaidContent has more.  Yahoo may announce layoffs as part of Bartz-driven reorganization &#8212; As GigaOm and The New York Times (and BoomTown) have [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PaidContent has more.  Yahoo may announce layoffs as part of Bartz-driven reorganization &#8212; As GigaOm and The New York Times (and BoomTown) have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Zawodny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Zawodny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FAIL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAIL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grakhul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grakhul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo has great technology, a broad range of Internet related offerings, good aggregation of content from all over the web, API and tools to give anyone access to this data, but their problem is that no one &quot;knows&quot; about it.  Not only that, a visit to their sites(there are soo many) will show how cluttered their content is. They need to return to simple times.

Offer the same products, keep it clean and dedicate pages to whatever functionality that page is supposed to be selling.

Right now whenever you hit a yahoo page, you are told about everything they do. Not good, very confusing.

Google is doing it right.  Amazon is slipping the way of yahoo.

Everyone likes clean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo has great technology, a broad range of Internet related offerings, good aggregation of content from all over the web, API and tools to give anyone access to this data, but their problem is that no one &#8220;knows&#8221; about it.  Not only that, a visit to their sites(there are soo many) will show how cluttered their content is. They need to return to simple times.</p>
<p>Offer the same products, keep it clean and dedicate pages to whatever functionality that page is supposed to be selling.</p>
<p>Right now whenever you hit a yahoo page, you are told about everything they do. Not good, very confusing.</p>
<p>Google is doing it right.  Amazon is slipping the way of yahoo.</p>
<p>Everyone likes clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigtoes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigtoes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft was blessed again. They were lucky and Yang &amp; associates are kicking themselves. MSFT will probably wait until Yahoo becomes junk since yahoo was heading downwards even before they lost the search biz to Google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft was blessed again. They were lucky and Yang &amp; associates are kicking themselves. MSFT will probably wait until Yahoo becomes junk since yahoo was heading downwards even before they lost the search biz to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cynic could quickly point out that this structure seems like an attempt for a mature company with employees in the five figures trying to pretend it is 1995 again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cynic could quickly point out that this structure seems like an attempt for a mature company with employees in the five figures trying to pretend it is 1995 again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this re-org rumor just a cover for the shuffling resulting from a MSFT deal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this re-org rumor just a cover for the shuffling resulting from a MSFT deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Sleuth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadget Sleuth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo needs to bite the bullet and just join up with Microsoft. It&#039;s the only way the company will ever make any real waves again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo needs to bite the bullet and just join up with Microsoft. It&#8217;s the only way the company will ever make any real waves again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally experienced this &quot;experiment&quot; at AOL a few years back; having separate organizational P&amp;L and goals never works; if it happens, nothing meaningful will ever ship.  There will be plenty of meetings though. &#039;nough said]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally experienced this &#8220;experiment&#8221; at AOL a few years back; having separate organizational P&amp;L and goals never works; if it happens, nothing meaningful will ever ship.  There will be plenty of meetings though. &#8216;nough said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Olanoff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Olanoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should merge with AOL and create a third division...&quot;Crap&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should merge with AOL and create a third division&#8230;&#8221;Crap&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whopies</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whopies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yahoos don&#039;t even bother finishing the reorg emails anymore, no one cares who will be spending the next eight weeks as their boss&#039;s boss&#039;s boss&#039;s boss&#039;s boss&#039;s boss. and why should they?

bartz&#039;s tough talk is being followed up with a hectic flurry of inaction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yahoos don&#8217;t even bother finishing the reorg emails anymore, no one cares who will be spending the next eight weeks as their boss&#8217;s boss&#8217;s boss&#8217;s boss&#8217;s boss&#8217;s boss. and why should they?</p>
<p>bartz&#8217;s tough talk is being followed up with a hectic flurry of inaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GMs all focused on designing great individual experiences are what give you a chance at winning mindshare and loyalty because they focus on the needs consumers have in each category.  When you take away that focus, organizationally, you take away the ability to compete.  What does it mean to run a &quot;business&quot; if you don&#039;t have control over the engineering and the product experience. I don&#039;t see how the org structure is set up to serve users or P&amp;L discipline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GMs all focused on designing great individual experiences are what give you a chance at winning mindshare and loyalty because they focus on the needs consumers have in each category.  When you take away that focus, organizationally, you take away the ability to compete.  What does it mean to run a &#8220;business&#8221; if you don&#8217;t have control over the engineering and the product experience. I don&#8217;t see how the org structure is set up to serve users or P&amp;L discipline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Bartz&#8217;s Yahoo Re-Org Coming Soon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finance Geek » Bartz&#8217;s Yahoo Re-Org Coming Soon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] confirms previously reported [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] confirms previously reported [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Another Yahoo Re-Org, Says Report</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/04/14/coming-soon-yet-another-re-org-at-yahoo/#comment-167405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finance Geek » Another Yahoo Re-Org, Says Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=45581#comment-167405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Om Malik says there&#8217;s another re-org coming to Yahoo: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik says there&#8217;s another re-org coming to Yahoo: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

