14 Comments

Summary:

April Fools’ Day is long gone, so PG&E’s latest blog post can’t be blamed on that: The Northern California utility just announced that it will be seeking approval from state regulators for a 200 MW power purchase agreement with Solaren, a company building solar panels in […]

solarspaceimageApril Fools’ Day is long gone, so PG&E’s latest blog post can’t be blamed on that: The Northern California utility just announced that it will be seeking approval from state regulators for a 200 MW power purchase agreement with Solaren, a company building solar panels in space. Yes, that’s space, as in where the moon is and astronauts go. PG&E says Solaren’s technology can take power from the solar panels and convert it into radio frequency energy, which it can then beam down to a receiver in California’s Fresno County.

It’s not as crazy as it sounds. Both the federal government and individual companies have been trying to figure out a way to do this for years — at least as far back as 1968, with Peter Glaser — and in 2007 the National Security Space Office released a report recommending how to lay the groundwork for commercial development of solar in space. PG&E writes that the advantages of space solar is that it’s 8-10 times greater than Earth-based solar — and space real estate is technically free.

But the fact that the government has been working on the idea for years isn’t necessarily encouraging. The technology has had such clear technical and economic hurdles that it hasn’t gotten very far. Most importantly it’s been prohibitively expensive. The NSSO entitled an appendix to its report as “10 Years — 10 Megawatts — $10 Billion.” PG&E acknowledges the hurdles, saying, “[M]aking it all work at an affordable cost is a major challenge,” but one that “Solaren says it can solve.”

As it should, PG&E puts all of the responsibility on Solaren for making this work:

Solaren is responsible for getting all the necessary permits and approvals from federal, state and local agencies. Among other things, Solaren will have to prove that its technology satisfies all applicable safety standards, an issue that space power enthusiasts have addressed in detail, but is nonetheless sure to be controversial. From PG&E’s perspective, as a supporter of new renewable energy technology, this project is a first-of-a-kind step worth taking. If Solaren succeeds, the world of clean energy will never be the same.

That state RPS must be pretty daunting for the utility to brave such an experimental technology. We have a feeling that neither the utility — nor First Solar, who bought the crashed-and-burned OptiSolar — will be investing actual money in this plan.

Image courtesy of Mafic Studios.

  1. Excuse the stereotyping; but, it surely sounds like California to me.

    Of course, I have neighbors who say they can do the same by holding crystals up to moonlight.

    Share
  2. In this case I’ve got to partly agree with u

    Share
  3. .

    “Space Solar Power hoax/illusion DEBUNKED” article

    http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/038sspdebunked.html

    .

    Share
  4. Cool! Get the approvals. No need for debunking, ghostly dude.

    Share
  5. PG&E must get credited on signing the contract as opposed to any power actually being supplied as that is the only way they will ever benefit from this deal.

    Remember, PG@E have signed supply deals with loads of BS solar projects before they even have locations or finance secured so signing supply deals is no indication of likely success. If you knocked on PG&Es door saying you had a couple of cows on a tread mill they’d probably sign you up.

    The space power plan is just lunacy. This company quotes a discovery doco as a technology demonstrator for RF power transmission, with only one problem, the test failed to deliver any more than QUOTE “less than 1/1000th of 1%” of the power transmitted was supposedly picked up at the receiver, i.e. Nothing. That has to be some kind of world record for inefficiency!!!

    The US Navy have a multi billion dollar space power project on the table who’s entire goal is to light a single LED with power supplied from a satellite. Based on the Discovery doco results, it will fail to supply even that much power.

    How these projects EVER get past the back of a napkin stage is beyond me.

    Share
  6. Paul,
    What about the classic NASA and DOE studies which referenced a 5GW satellite (equivalent to 10 nuke plants) with no technical show stoppers?

    What about the 2007 DOD study which confirms the above, and the 2008 Naval Research Lab study which backs the DOD conclusion?

    See the Goldstone wireless power demo on Youtube. Much stonger results than Discovery would pay for or the FAA would allow between Hawaiian islands.

    Share
  7. the phrase “pie in the sky” comes to mind…

    Share
  8. [...] here’s a news story that made me sit up and take notice. According to GigaOm greentech blog Earth2Tech, California’s megautility PG&E is in the midst of a project to develop solar power in [...]

    Share
  9. [...] the oceans of Earth to the depths of space where West Coast utility giant PG&E signed a landmark 200 MW power purchase agreement with Solaren, a company building solar panels in space. [...]

    Share
  10. Sounds like a good idea. As long as they don’t harness the energy into a weapon like in James Bonds Moonraker. I wouldn’t put it past them haha.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post