10 Comments

Summary:

The Federal Communications Commission will open up on Wednesday a Notice of Inquiry for the forthcoming National Broadband Plan, kicking off what interim FCC chair Michael Copps calls “an open, participatory, public process.” I hope it is, but traditionally our citizens have been quicker to complain […]

The Federal Communications Commission will open up on Wednesday a Notice of Inquiry for the forthcoming National Broadband Plan, kicking off what interim FCC chair Michael Copps calls “an open, participatory, public process.” I hope it is, but traditionally our citizens have been quicker to complain to the providers of web-based services than to the agency that regulates the pipes over which such services are delivered. For those of you who want to participate (and don’t want to let Verizon or AT&T lobbyists dominate the conversation), I encourage you to file a comment.

The FCC does read them. When the agency solicited comments on the issue of Comcast blocking P2P files, it received thousands of them, some of which significantly influenced the proceedings. And the issue at stake with the National Broadband Plan is, quite frankly, far more important. The commission is expected to issue a series of questions in the hopes of figuring out where the U.S. currently stands with regard to broadband penetration and where it should go in terms of access technologies and speeds.

At the same time that it’s soliciting comments for the National Broadband Plan, the FCC will also be seeking input as to how it should advise the two agencies distributing the $7.2 billion in broadband stimulus funds. In the last week, telecommunications companies have weighed in as to whether stimulus money should go to underserved markets or unserved markets (the distinction could limit the scope of funds to areas with no broadband rather than areas where people have access to slow or expensive broadband), the definition of broadband, whether or not grant recipients should reach a minimum speed threshold (higher minimum speeds make wireless a less viable option), and if private entities even can get the stimulus money or if they will have to work with the states and non-profits.

Many of these issues will also be important in the National Broadband Plan, but if you’re not sure why this matters, think about your current broadband access (mine’s about 7 Mbps/second and about to be metered) and then check out today’s news that Australia will spend $31 billion building out a national broadband network with 100 Mbps pipes.

  1. So, how are we participate in this, or even make our voice heard. I want to know what the FCC gonna do about these “metered” craps that these broadband companies come up with. They are testing out the “water” to see if anybody object. And they are just trying to come up more novelty ways to filling up their pockets and bellies at our expenses and putting the nation’s network technological advancements and novelties behind other nations. Probably, this is just another show that the FCC is trying to show that they care our voices, when after all they are actually putting their ears with those lobbyists. Congratulation to the Australians. At least their government cares about the national broadband network.

    Antony

    Share
    1. You can file a public comment on their website though I don’t think this topic is available yet.

      And the governing party in Australia is pushing for content censorship for all citizens, so that hardly seems like an example to aspire to.

      Share
      1. It’s my desire to have higher speed networks at lower prices so the work and entertainment needs we have here in east Texas, not unlike many less metropolitan areas, can be filled. But really, as far as entertainment goes, if the Internet was down and my on-line work was done, there is plenty the good Lord provided to do to keep one occupied.

        (not pretending to know the details of the Australian plan) Quite frankly,in my opinion, the U.S. government stepping in and stopping the sewers from over running our countries moral foundation is badly needed. Any country that lets ‘that stuff’ continue unchecked for long can see the decay taking place. Just look around you and see the explosion of crimes all taught through the rose colored glasses of our ‘freedom’. I don’t need or want that freedom delivered to me, my family, my neighbors or the citizens of our community. That pollution doesn’t just sit idly in the wire. Hopefully this period of inaction we have experienced thus far has not already done it’s damage and we’ve gone too far to contain what has escaped.

        Share
  2. [...] Why you should pay attention to the national broadband plan No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post) [...]

    Share
  3. [...] the kickoff of this national broadband plan proceeding is receiving so much coverage.  Where did this strange bird come from, and where is it going?  Well, [...]

    Share
  4. [...] the FCC called for a comments on a national broadband plan, [...]

    Share
  5. [...] of people who have opinions and ideas about broadband. This is a big issue, and a few months ago I encouraged you guys to submit a letter or comment as well. Google has just made it easier. Not because the search giant [...]

    Share
  6. [...]  0 Julius Genachowski, the chairman of the Federal Communication Commission today outlined his vision for broadband in America — 100 Mbps connections to 100 million homes. As part of an update to Congress on the National [...]

    Share
  7. [...] } Julius Genachowski, chairman of the Federal Communication Commission, has outlined his vision for broadband in America: 100 Mbps connections to 100 million homes. As part of an update on the National Broadband Plan due [...]

    Share
  8. [...] } Julius Genachowski, chairman of the Federal Communication Commission, has outlined his vision for broadband in America: 100 Mbps connections to 100 million homes. As part of an update on the National Broadband Plan due [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post