Comments on: Updated: AT&T Decides Net Neutrality Won't Work for Wireless http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:01:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ed http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-581547 Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:13:05 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-581547 Yeess! At some point I was on the way to use AT&T services but changed my mind. And only now found out about this.

]]> By: Google’s Lame Defense of its Net Neutrality Pact http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166277 Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:29:26 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166277 [...] can still occur at the network level and is likely to regardless of what device is attached. If AT&T wants to block YouTube on its wireless network it can, and phones, computers and anything else would be [...]

]]> By: FCC’s Net Neutrality Push to Boldly Go Where Congress Has Failed Thrice Before http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166276 Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:35:37 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166276 [...] and VoIP that frustrates other providers to no end. But any wireless proposal would be especially controversial, given the limited amount of spectrum available to carriers on their wireless networks. The Journal [...]

]]> By: AT&T’s new terms of service released, then retracted « OFF THE TECH http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166275 Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:31:38 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166275 [...] [GigaOm via Engadget] [...]

]]> By: Technical Difficulties » Technical Difficulties - EP 8 http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166274 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:57:43 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166274 [...] – AT&T: Net Neutrality & Netbooks [...]

]]> By: Internet Marketing, Strategy & Technology Links - Apr 6, 2009 « Sazbean http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166273 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:03:08 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166273 [...] Updated: AT&T Decides Net Neutrality Won’t Work for Wireless (GigaOM) [...]

]]> By: The GigaOM Weekly Recap: http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166272 Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:43:41 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166272 [...] AT&T decided net neutrality and wireless don’t get along. [...]

]]> By: Digital Home Future » Blog Archive » AT&T tweaks wireless agreement of account to forbid video alive, filesharing, abstracts tethering http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166271 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:42:56 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166271 [...] [Via GigaOm] [...]

]]> By: AT&T bans all tethering/video applications http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166270 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:16:49 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166270 [...] me, even in a week where T-Mobile block Skype on the iPhone I thought I had seen it all, until now “AT&T Wireless terms of service now explicitly prohibit “downloading movies using P2P f… AT&T changes TOS to limit mobile video I know someone will probably kick my ass in the [...]

]]> By: Robert Hallock http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166269 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:33:23 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166269 “Done in error” or done hoping nobody would notice?

It’s a shame the contract was reverted; now I can’t bail on AT&Terrible without an ETF.

]]> By: vinod http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166268 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:48:07 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166268 unless consumers complain as much about jittery video as they do about dropped calls, wireless carriers have no incentive to treat the 2 types of data the same.

]]> By: AT&T’s new mobile rules are BS http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166267 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:52:52 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166267 [...] just catching the news on AT&T’s new TOS which seriously limits the potential for bringing your own mobile [...]

]]> By: » AT&T tweaks wireless terms of service to forbid video streaming, filesharing, data tethering http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166266 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:09:34 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166266 [...] [Via GigaOm] [...]

]]> By: Edwatd Craig http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166265 Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:55:03 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166265 It’s amusing I hadn’t thought of Skypr for my G1 until I noticed these stories about AT&T’s shenanigans.
Successfully installed. No complaint from T-mobile.

]]> By: Demian http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166264 Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:44:44 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166264 Already retracted:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/03/atandt-retracts-new-terms-of-service-apologizes/

]]> By: AT&T tweaks wireless terms of service to forbid video streaming, filesharing, data tethering | www.webhostservices.biz http://gigaom.com/2009/04/02/att-decides-net-neutrality-wont-work-for-wireless/#comment-166263 Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:28:56 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=44591#comment-166263 [...] [Via GigaOm] [...]

]]>