17 Comments

Summary:

Update April 3: Five days after the terms of service were changed, and four days after the first outcry in the online community, AT&T has retracted the worrisome language in its TOS that forbid third-party video transfers over its cellular network. Today the carrier issued the […]

Update April 3: Five days after the terms of service were changed, and four days after the first outcry in the online community, AT&T has retracted the worrisome language in its TOS that forbid third-party video transfers over its cellular network. Today the carrier issued the following statement: “The language added on March 30 to AT&T’s wireless data service Terms and Conditions was done in error. It was brought to our attention and we have since removed it. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.” [original story follows]

Earlier this week AT&T revised its wireless plans to limit data services. The move effectively declares that AT&T doesn’t have to transfer third-party video over its wireless network. This would negatively impact Sling mobile applications, including its planned iPhone release, and potentially 3G video-streaming apps like CBS’s for TV.com. It also means AT&T isn’t abiding by net neutrality standards common for wired networks on its 3G wireless network.

As the Public Knowledge Policy Blog points out, the AT&T Wireless terms of service now explicitly prohibit “downloading movies using P2P file sharing services, customer initiated redirection of television or other video or audio signals via any technology from a fixed location to a mobile device, web broadcasting, and/or for the operation of servers, telemetry devices and/or Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition devices.”

AT&T also spells out overage prices for mobile data, and says it won’t carry unused data to the next month.

On the 5GB DataConnect Plan, once you exceed your 5GB allowance you will be automatically charged $0.00048 per Kb for any data used. On the 200MB Data Connect Plan, once you exceed your 200MB allowance, you will be automatically charged $10 for an additional 100MB.

Wireless networks don’t presume to be neutral like the Internet — operators have bought the rights to do whatever they want with their wireless spectrum — but this could set new precedents for cramping developers’ and users’ style.

An AT&T spokesperson said he is looking into the matter for us. Meanwhile, Sling Media spokesperson Jay Tannenbaum commented via email, “Even with high quality of the stream that we provide we have never really encountered any complaints about exceeding the 5gig cap. What we strive to do is offer the best quality while shielding the user from carrier bandwidth constraints.”

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Buns and Chou Chou Thursday, April 2, 2009

    This sucks! It’s understandable that these guys want to leverage their infrastructure, but it’s so annoying and tiring to deal with as consumers. Ugggh.

  2. AT&T Decides Net Neutrality Won’t Work for Wireless Thursday, April 2, 2009

    [...] of servers, telemetry devices and/or Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition devices.” NewTeeVee has some good analysis of what this could mean for online video companies and consumers. [...]

  3. What makes this even more pathetic is that AT&T just dove into the SmartGrid arena thus keeping those applications and related M2M bandwidth to themselves! Not quite sure but I foresee some lawsuits in the making on this one.

  4. Пресата presata.com» Blog Archive » AT&T’s Lame New Terms of Service Hate Mobile Video From Sling and P2P [At&t] Friday, April 3, 2009

    [...] Net neutrailty just doesn’t apply to invisible internets, you know, since you don’t want them to run out. [AT&T via Public Knowledge via NewTeeVee] [...]

  5. AT&T: We Don’t Hate Skype, Just Our Partners Pushing It Friday, April 3, 2009

    [...] AT&T, with its efforts to restrict Skype on the iPhone to Wi-Fi hotspots, and what appear to be attempts to block some video services as well, is looking like the Comcast of the wireless net neutrality debate.  In one of my favorite pieces [...]

  6. ReelSmart.com :: Video, Technology, Digital LifeStyle, Macintosh Tips, and Opinions » AT&T New TOS Starts Firestorm with iPhone Users Friday, April 3, 2009

    [...] Media spokesperson Jay Tannenbaum has commented via email to NewTeeVee, “Even with high quality of the stream that we provide we have never really encountered any [...]

  7. AT&T bans all tethering/video applications Friday, April 3, 2009

    [...] of service now explicitly prohibit “downloading movies using P2P file sharing services” AT&T changes TOS to limit mobile video I know someone will probably kick my ass in the comments over my stance on net neutrality on [...]

  8. AT&T Retracts TOS Change — It Was All about Sling Saturday, April 4, 2009

    [...] Retracts TOS Change — It Was All about Sling After we wrote on Thursday that AT&T had altered its terms of service to limit mobile video, the company [...]

  9. GigategyAT&T’s Lame New Terms of Service Hate Mobile Video From Sling and P2P [At&t] Sunday, April 5, 2009

    [...] Net neutrailty just doesn’t apply to invisible internets, you know, since you don’t want them to run out. [AT&T via Public Knowledge via NewTeeVee] [...]

  10. Possible reason for Slingplayer release delay | TechyPenguin Monday, April 6, 2009

    [...] AT&T Changes TOS to Limit Mobile Video [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post