<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onehub: Simple, Customizable File Sharing and Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/31/onehub-simple-customizable-file-sharing-and-collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/31/onehub-simple-customizable-file-sharing-and-collaboration/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:17:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theresaneil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/31/onehub-simple-customizable-file-sharing-and-collaboration/#comment-81277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theresaneil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=10149#comment-81277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to try this out- but if the invitation to users doesn&#039;t come across as simple, quick and intuitive, it won&#039;t work for my clients to sign in and use (they are paying me to design simple, quick and intuitive software- the tool I use to share and collaborate should meet that bar).

Have you looked at ConceptShare, Colaab, and this article with a bunch of others? http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/02/14-applications-for-project-management-and-collaboration/

Publishing from from Pages to iWork.com shows a lot of potential- but it needs to mature (like versions and workspaces with multiple documents).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to try this out- but if the invitation to users doesn&#8217;t come across as simple, quick and intuitive, it won&#8217;t work for my clients to sign in and use (they are paying me to design simple, quick and intuitive software- the tool I use to share and collaborate should meet that bar).</p>
<p>Have you looked at ConceptShare, Colaab, and this article with a bunch of others? <a href="http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/02/14-applications-for-project-management-and-collaboration/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/02/14-applications-for-project-management-and-collaboration/</a></p>
<p>Publishing from from Pages to iWork.com shows a lot of potential- but it needs to mature (like versions and workspaces with multiple documents).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CD</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/31/onehub-simple-customizable-file-sharing-and-collaboration/#comment-81276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=10149#comment-81276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fault with the service is simply this. When you invite someone to a hub, their account includes a link to their own dashboard, where they are encouraged to &quot;create a hub&quot;. It&#039;s a horrible attempt at virally spreading their application at the expense of its users. I can never use this product to create for instance a Dealer Extranet, if all of my dealers are going to be confused with options to &quot;create their own hubs&quot; or to &quot;upgrade their accounts&quot;.

For the admin, it&#039;s fine, but they need a different model for endusers, otherwise, it&#039;s too confusing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fault with the service is simply this. When you invite someone to a hub, their account includes a link to their own dashboard, where they are encouraged to &#8220;create a hub&#8221;. It&#8217;s a horrible attempt at virally spreading their application at the expense of its users. I can never use this product to create for instance a Dealer Extranet, if all of my dealers are going to be confused with options to &#8220;create their own hubs&#8221; or to &#8220;upgrade their accounts&#8221;.</p>
<p>For the admin, it&#8217;s fine, but they need a different model for endusers, otherwise, it&#8217;s too confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkjones</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/31/onehub-simple-customizable-file-sharing-and-collaboration/#comment-81275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mkjones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=10149#comment-81275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been playing around with OneHub for a few days and although I find it blisteringly quick to set up, I can&#039;t quite get my head around if its any good for business/client collaboration.

My ideal use for the tool would be some sort of feedback/mock-up area where I can create sites for clients so they can really get involved and quit using email. Hopefully with a little more experimentation I can build something like this.

On a positive note the widgets they have are really impressive, so impressive in fact I can&#039;t yet find any technical fault with the service.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been playing around with OneHub for a few days and although I find it blisteringly quick to set up, I can&#8217;t quite get my head around if its any good for business/client collaboration.</p>
<p>My ideal use for the tool would be some sort of feedback/mock-up area where I can create sites for clients so they can really get involved and quit using email. Hopefully with a little more experimentation I can build something like this.</p>
<p>On a positive note the widgets they have are really impressive, so impressive in fact I can&#8217;t yet find any technical fault with the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
