10 Comments

Summary:

In his first day at the helm of General Motors, Fritz Henderson wants to deliver one message: We’ll get the job done. Henderson repeated that pledge, in various ways, at a press conference this morning, saying that the automaker aims to quickly reinvent itself as a […]

In his first day at the helm of General Motors, Fritz Henderson wants to deliver one message: We’ll get the job done. Henderson repeated that pledge, in various ways, at a press conference this morning, saying that the automaker aims to quickly reinvent itself as a competitive enterprise whether in or out of bankruptcy court. “We get it,” he said, referring to the Obama administration’s assessment (and rejection) of GM’s turnaround plan. “We need to do more, and we need to do it faster.”

Wagoner, Lutz, Henderson with Production Version Chevrolet Volt

Henderson acknowledged (and agreed with) the auto task force’s criticism that GM has historically relied too heavily on revenue from high-margin trucks and SUVs. Going forward, he said, “everything’s gotta pay rent” — even in an economic climate like today’s.  A car like the extended-range electric Chevy Volt, however, probably won’t make rent (i.e., generate meaningful profit) for at least a couple generations. As we’ve noted before — and as Obama’s auto task force pointed out in yesterday’s report — the first-generation, $40,000 Volt will almost certainly be a money loser for GM.

Henderson didn’t say that outright, but he did indicate an awareness that GM will need to buckle down and boost margins across its entire lineup in order to finance continued development of the Volt. “As we get into the next generation of technologies,” he said, mentioning the Volt and GM’s lineup of flex-fuel and hybrid vehicles as examples, “that requires money. That requires investment.”

  1. Electric Vehicle Owner Tuesday, March 31, 2009

    ““As we get into the next generation of technologies,” he said, mentioning the Volt and GM’s lineup of flex-fuel and hybrid vehicles as examples, “that requires money. That requires investment.”

    Ya, whatever, build them already. You’re 35 years late.

    Nice way to tell us that for decades they’ve been overcharging consumers for wallowing, herky-jerky, obsolete technology, milking it beyond dry, and still managed to lose money.

    Flex fuel was/is an ok concept until the scams that are low mileage corn ethanol and cost more energy to make it than you get from it with no existing infrastructure (unlike electricity) hydrogen came along and dirtied it up. They should just ‘fess up and say high energy biodiesel and non-food-crop low energy ethanol, which are at least cheap and doable.

    In the meantime, “in terms of overall performance, the diesels of Audi and Peugeot took four of the top five positions with the No 2 Audi R15 TDI winning by 22 seconds over the No 8 Peugeot 908 after 12 hours of racing.” To beat Audi’s killer diesels, Peugeot is going with a diesel hybrid, with the electric drive providing the performance edge:
    http://www.autobloggreen.com/2009/03/25/peugeot-commits-to-racing-diesel-hybrid-at-2011-le-mans/

  2. kerry bradshaw Tuesday, March 31, 2009

    Henderson may agree that with higher oil prices, trucks and SUVs can be risky, but there is simply nothing that GM can make that will generate those profits. In effect, he’s saying that GM will be even worse off than before, when Toyota and Honda were able to make enough profit to redesign their cars twice as often as GM. Unless GM lucks out and finds some designing genius who can style cars that will be lusted after (the auto business is really all about looks and comfort – even the vaunted Beetle never sold cars heavily into the middle class, those who bought cars frequently) there is no reason to believe that GM can compete if they make the mistake of trying to exist on small cars. Everyone knows that that simply won’t work. Can you imagine Mercedes
    doing that? Obama is talking out of both sides (actually all four sides) of his mouth by contradicting himself – he wants “high tech cars” (what yhey are and why he thinks they will succeed remains a mystery – remember the Edsel?) then the next minute claims that the Volt won’t help GM. Then he mistakenly claims that GM is far behind on hybrids (apparently Obama doesn’t keep up with auto news)
    and that they wil be salvation (don’t mention that Toyota has never made a dime off its best selling hybrid). Oh, yeah, the future sure looks rosy with Obama sticking his big foot in his equally big mouth.
    Now, what exactly became of that campaign pledge to balance the budget? Hmm…

  3. GM, Segway Team Up On Tiny Electric Vehicle Tuesday, April 7, 2009

    [...] No Comments Posted April 7th, 2009 at 8:40 am in Automotive,Big Green We know General Motors is teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, but building a new car that looks like a souped-up wheelchair may not be [...]

  4. GM Topples Into Bankruptcy: What’s Next for the Chevy Volt? Monday, June 1, 2009

    [...] to step down — said GM would have to improve profit margins across the entire GM fleet in order to have the resources to invest in advanced technologies, such as the Volt. This morning Henderson emphasized in a press conference [...]

  5. Why GM Killed the 2010 Chevy Malibu Hybrid Thursday, June 11, 2009

    [...] the Malibu Hybrid didn’t “pay rent” (i.e. generate meaningful profit) — a new requirement for all vehicles in the GM lineup, as CEO Fritz Henderson put it on his first day on the job, after the Obama administration asked Wagoner to step down. The company [...]

  6. GM Gets a Fresh Start — Will Green Innovation Rise from the Ashes? Friday, July 10, 2009

    [...] expected to be profitable for at least the first generation, in a time when Henderson has said the company needs every model to “pay rent” (by contrast, the company has for years relied on large, higher margin SUVs to cover losses on [...]

  7. Smartphones: the Ultimate Model for Green Cars? Thursday, July 16, 2009

    [...] that could be customized for each driver. Loading cars with driver-facing tech could be key to boosting automakers’ margins on smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles (in recent years many of them have relied on bigger [...]

  8. Should Electric Vehicle Makers Be in the Battery Biz? Tuesday, September 15, 2009

    [...] either prohibitively expensive for an average consumer at this point, or forcing the company to consider selling it without a profit for at least the first few [...]

  9. The Nissan LEAF: Why It Will Be Profitable From the Get-Go Tuesday, May 4, 2010

    [...] contrasts with competitors like General Motors, which has said it will likely sell the upcoming plug-in Chevy Volt at a loss for at least the [...]

  10. Nissan: LEAF, Like Other Electric Cars, Will Lose Money at First Monday, May 17, 2010

    [...] Brian Carolin tells the Wall Street Journal. That brings Nissan’s expectations more in line with competitors like General Motors which has said it will likely sell the upcoming plug-in Chevy Volt at a loss for at least the [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post