Comments on: Thunder in the Cloud Over Openness http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:19:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: The Open Cloud Manifesto « powerx7 http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165420 Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:17:23 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165420 [...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]

]]> By: The Open Cloud Manifesto | http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165419 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:50:43 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165419 [...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]

]]> By: Tectonic » Buffer Overflow: Android, MonoDevelop, Open Cloud, air traffic control http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165418 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:04:44 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165418 [...] standards for cloud computing. Matt Asay says it is IBM and others are calling the group a cabal. Not a good start to an open cloud [...]

]]> By: The Open Cloud Manifesto « El blog de Enrique Dans http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165417 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:30:50 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165417 [...] La polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que atacaba la iniciativa y la tildaba de secretista y de oscura.  Steven afirmaba que lo que había que hacer era poner el documento en un wiki y discutirlo abiertamente, y que la cuestión de los estándares precisaba una discusión larga hasta que el proceso se solidificase. El recurso a este tipo de técnicas no es nuevo en la estrategia de Microsoft: reclamar el desarrollo de un proceso supuestamente abierto en el que poder intervenir, para poder llegar a posiciones de fijación de estándares ventajosas mediante la saturación del proceso con “votos amigos” y estandarizaciones de facto. En realidad, el Open Cloud Manifesto es un documento enormemente generalista y abierto, que pretende sentar definiciones y bases de funcionamiento de cara al futuro, y en ese sentido resulta de lo más recomendable revisar cada una de sus seis páginas. [...]

]]> By: The Open Cloud Manifesto is Nothing But a Vapor Tiger | Digital Asset Management http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165416 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:14:00 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165416 [...] week, we watched the big names in the IT industry play their little reindeer games over a proposed Open Cloud Manifesto put forth by IBM. I have to say, it wasn’t worth it. As far as Manifestos go, this one is pretty benign. Who cares [...]

]]> By: The Open Cloud Manifesto // Sobre Tecnologia http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165415 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:57:04 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165415 [...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]

]]> By: The Open Cloud Manifesto is Nothing But a Vapor Tiger http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165414 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:24:46 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165414 [...] week, we watched the big names in the IT industry play their little reindeer games over a proposed Open Cloud Manifesto put forth by IBM. I have to say, it wasn’t worth it. As far as Manifestos go, this one is pretty benign. Who [...]

]]> By: OStatic Buffer Overflow | google android os blog http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165413 Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:14:28 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165413 [...] Is a cabal of tech companies, including IBM, Sun Microsystems, and Enomaly developing a secretive "Open Cloud Manifesto?" Some say so. [...]

]]> By: Manifesto spurs a battle among giants in the cloud » VentureBeat http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165412 Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:08:28 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165412 [...] for openness is complaining about a lack of openness is pretty ironic in and of itself, as many other bloggers were eager to point out — and not always [...]

]]> By: Geva Perry http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165411 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:12:06 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165411 I published the full text of the Open Cloud Manifesto on my blog:

http://gevaperry.typepad.com/main/2009/03/the-open-cloud-manifesto-much-ado-about-nothing.html

]]> By: thegeniusfiles http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165410 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:03:26 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165410 Nobody invited Microsoft to the party? That is just wrong. To rectify the situation, I am pleased to announce the Open Sewer Initiative. Microsoft, please feel free to jump in at any time.

]]> By: Subhash Bose http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165409 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:09:29 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165409 Which part of microsoft software is open exactly?

]]> By: Treova http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165408 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:12:06 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165408 How open is this initiative if I cannot even see it! Look, I am no supporter of Mr. Softie, but this thing is already beginning to smell like a half-baked marketing initiative.

Cloud Computing means so many different things to different stakeholders. Looking forward to the Monday release.

Also see
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/microsoft-pokes-hole-cloud-computing/story.aspx?guid=%7BFE589532%2D894D%2D44AE%2D8FB3%2D14C11DF54892%7D#comments1934232

]]> By: Sam Johnston http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165407 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:25:05 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165407 Geir summed it up nicely[1]:

“You’ve got a serious problem when MSFT can call you out on openness and they – despite being MSFT – have a point.”

This comment[2] on TechCrunch’s colourful Out of Order 2.0 article has some merit too:

“It was a committee having a secret meeting. End of story.

This committee should be disbanded and a new one formed, and all the participants of the secret meetings should be barred from the new committee.

As far as committees and committee rules go, this is an ethical lapse of the highest order.”

Sam

1. http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/geir/archives/001785_open_cloud_fail.html
2. http://www.techcrunchit.com/2009/03/26/out-of-order-20/#comment-8783
3. http://www.techcrunchit.com/2009/03/26/out-of-order-20/

]]> By: Sam Johnston http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165406 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:05:36 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165406 Geir summed it up nicely:

“You’ve got a serious problem when MSFT can call you out on openness and they – despite being MSFT – have a point.”

This comment on TechCrunch’s colourful Out of Order 2.0 article has some merit too:

“It was a committee having a secret meeting. End of story.

This committee should be disbanded and a new one formed, and all the participants of the secret meetings should be barred from the new committee.

As far as committees and committee rules go, this is an ethical lapse of the highest order.”

Sam

]]> By: TanNg http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165405 Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:38:43 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165405 I don’t understand you point. Are you supporting open process and Microsoft offer or not? Or you just take this as an opportunity to bash Microsoft.

]]>