<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunder in the Cloud Over Openness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Cloud Manifesto &#171; powerx7</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Open Cloud Manifesto &#171; powerx7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Cloud Manifesto &#124;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Open Cloud Manifesto &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tectonic &#187; Buffer Overflow: Android, MonoDevelop, Open Cloud, air traffic control</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tectonic &#187; Buffer Overflow: Android, MonoDevelop, Open Cloud, air traffic control]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] standards for cloud computing. Matt Asay says it is IBM and others are calling the group a cabal. Not a good start to an open cloud [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] standards for cloud computing. Matt Asay says it is IBM and others are calling the group a cabal. Not a good start to an open cloud [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Cloud Manifesto &#171; El blog de Enrique Dans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Open Cloud Manifesto &#171; El blog de Enrique Dans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] La polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que atacaba la iniciativa y la tildaba de secretista y de oscura.  Steven afirmaba que lo que había que hacer era poner el documento en un wiki y discutirlo abiertamente, y que la cuestión de los estándares precisaba una discusión larga hasta que el proceso se solidificase. El recurso a este tipo de técnicas no es nuevo en la estrategia de Microsoft: reclamar el desarrollo de un proceso supuestamente abierto en el que poder intervenir, para poder llegar a posiciones de fijación de estándares ventajosas mediante la saturación del proceso con “votos amigos” y estandarizaciones de facto. En realidad, el Open Cloud Manifesto es un documento enormemente generalista y abierto, que pretende sentar definiciones y bases de funcionamiento de cara al futuro, y en ese sentido resulta de lo más recomendable revisar cada una de sus seis páginas. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] La polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que atacaba la iniciativa y la tildaba de secretista y de oscura.  Steven afirmaba que lo que había que hacer era poner el documento en un wiki y discutirlo abiertamente, y que la cuestión de los estándares precisaba una discusión larga hasta que el proceso se solidificase. El recurso a este tipo de técnicas no es nuevo en la estrategia de Microsoft: reclamar el desarrollo de un proceso supuestamente abierto en el que poder intervenir, para poder llegar a posiciones de fijación de estándares ventajosas mediante la saturación del proceso con “votos amigos” y estandarizaciones de facto. En realidad, el Open Cloud Manifesto es un documento enormemente generalista y abierto, que pretende sentar definiciones y bases de funcionamiento de cara al futuro, y en ese sentido resulta de lo más recomendable revisar cada una de sus seis páginas. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Cloud Manifesto is Nothing But a Vapor Tiger &#124; Digital Asset Management</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Open Cloud Manifesto is Nothing But a Vapor Tiger &#124; Digital Asset Management]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] week, we watched the big names in the IT industry play their little reindeer games over a proposed Open Cloud Manifesto put forth by IBM. I have to say, it wasn’t worth it. As far as Manifestos go, this one is pretty benign. Who cares [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, we watched the big names in the IT industry play their little reindeer games over a proposed Open Cloud Manifesto put forth by IBM. I have to say, it wasn’t worth it. As far as Manifestos go, this one is pretty benign. Who cares [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Cloud Manifesto // Sobre Tecnologia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Open Cloud Manifesto // Sobre Tecnologia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] polémica se desató la semana pasada a partir de una entrada de Steven Martin, de Microsoft, en las que [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Cloud Manifesto is Nothing But a Vapor Tiger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Open Cloud Manifesto is Nothing But a Vapor Tiger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] week, we watched the big names in the IT industry play their little reindeer games over a proposed Open Cloud Manifesto put forth by IBM. I have to say, it wasn&#8217;t worth it. As far as Manifestos go, this one is pretty benign. Who [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, we watched the big names in the IT industry play their little reindeer games over a proposed Open Cloud Manifesto put forth by IBM. I have to say, it wasn&#8217;t worth it. As far as Manifestos go, this one is pretty benign. Who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OStatic Buffer Overflow &#124; google android os blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OStatic Buffer Overflow &#124; google android os blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Is a cabal of tech companies, including IBM, Sun Microsystems, and Enomaly developing a secretive &quot;Open Cloud Manifesto?&quot; Some say so. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is a cabal of tech companies, including IBM, Sun Microsystems, and Enomaly developing a secretive &quot;Open Cloud Manifesto?&quot; Some say so. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manifesto spurs a battle among giants in the cloud &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manifesto spurs a battle among giants in the cloud &#187; VentureBeat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for openness is complaining about a lack of openness is pretty ironic in and of itself, as many other bloggers were eager to point out &#8212; and not always [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for openness is complaining about a lack of openness is pretty ironic in and of itself, as many other bloggers were eager to point out &#8212; and not always [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geva Perry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/thunder-in-the-cloud-over-openness/#comment-165411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geva Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43736#comment-165411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I published the full text of the Open Cloud Manifesto on my blog:

http://gevaperry.typepad.com/main/2009/03/the-open-cloud-manifesto-much-ado-about-nothing.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I published the full text of the Open Cloud Manifesto on my blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://gevaperry.typepad.com/main/2009/03/the-open-cloud-manifesto-much-ado-about-nothing.html" rel="nofollow">http://gevaperry.typepad.com/main/2009/03/the-open-cloud-manifesto-much-ado-about-nothing.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
