<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GigaOM Spring Cleaning: Motorola and Others Hit the Dustbin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/gigaom-spring-cleaning-motorola-and-others-hit-the-dustbin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/gigaom-spring-cleaning-motorola-and-others-hit-the-dustbin/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/gigaom-spring-cleaning-motorola-and-others-hit-the-dustbin/#comment-165425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43474#comment-165425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t Motorola still own a big chunk of Clearwire? Sure they wrote it down to nothing like all the other investors, but the equity stake would still be there. In a way by covering Clearwire, you continue to cover Moto by proxy and that may just be the best way to do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Motorola still own a big chunk of Clearwire? Sure they wrote it down to nothing like all the other investors, but the equity stake would still be there. In a way by covering Clearwire, you continue to cover Moto by proxy and that may just be the best way to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalmatan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/gigaom-spring-cleaning-motorola-and-others-hit-the-dustbin/#comment-165424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dalmatan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43474#comment-165424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om is right .. Huawei is the most interesting and most dangerous. I&#039;ve seen them is action. They may now have more engineers at IETF than Cisco. The dont need to buy Nortel ..every Nortel employee probably has a standing resume in place with Huawei.  Look at where they are placing their North Americian Offices.

As for Qualcomm ..the most detested name in mobile. Just ask the operators ..Why is VZ and Sprint so gang ho on LTE? Just to get out from under the dreaded Qualcomm tax on CDMA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om is right .. Huawei is the most interesting and most dangerous. I&#8217;ve seen them is action. They may now have more engineers at IETF than Cisco. The dont need to buy Nortel ..every Nortel employee probably has a standing resume in place with Huawei.  Look at where they are placing their North Americian Offices.</p>
<p>As for Qualcomm ..the most detested name in mobile. Just ask the operators ..Why is VZ and Sprint so gang ho on LTE? Just to get out from under the dreaded Qualcomm tax on CDMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Mosaku</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/gigaom-spring-cleaning-motorola-and-others-hit-the-dustbin/#comment-165423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo Mosaku]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43474#comment-165423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I concur with Victor, about 5 years ago a friend hosted a conference in China, I was at the time Online Director for COLT Telecom (www.colt.net) in Europe and I told my colleagues at COLT to watch out for specifically two companies ZTE and Hauwei. At that time they were little known and COLT were firmly Cisco/Nortel partners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Victor, about 5 years ago a friend hosted a conference in China, I was at the time Online Director for COLT Telecom (www.colt.net) in Europe and I told my colleagues at COLT to watch out for specifically two companies ZTE and Hauwei. At that time they were little known and COLT were firmly Cisco/Nortel partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/gigaom-spring-cleaning-motorola-and-others-hit-the-dustbin/#comment-165422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43474#comment-165422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agreed and yes we are following ZTE closely. I like that company but because of the sheer size we went with Huawei. ZTE is in the coverage area for us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed and yes we are following ZTE closely. I like that company but because of the sheer size we went with Huawei. ZTE is in the coverage area for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Blake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/27/gigaom-spring-cleaning-motorola-and-others-hit-the-dustbin/#comment-165421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor Blake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43474#comment-165421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You missed ZTE. If you had to name two vendors that are of growing importance in North America it&#039;s ZTE and Huawei -- in that order. Personally I&#039;ve been more impressed with ZTE to date, but both are extremely capable well organized companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed ZTE. If you had to name two vendors that are of growing importance in North America it&#8217;s ZTE and Huawei &#8212; in that order. Personally I&#8217;ve been more impressed with ZTE to date, but both are extremely capable well organized companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

