<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco&#039;s Data Center Moves to Spark More M&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco vs. the World: Rough Seas Ahead?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco vs. the World: Rough Seas Ahead?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as routers and switches, has more recently been chasing new markets such as video conferencing and data center-focused technologies including servers. Sure, over the long term, the upside of these markets is huge, but in the near term these moves [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as routers and switches, has more recently been chasing new markets such as video conferencing and data center-focused technologies including servers. Sure, over the long term, the upside of these markets is huge, but in the near term these moves [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Will Buy Brocade?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who Will Buy Brocade?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Wall Street Journal likes HP as an acquirer because it would enhance HP&#8217;s own line of networking gear, called ProCurve. HP has been striking deals left and right in an effort to boost its unified [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Wall Street Journal likes HP as an acquirer because it would enhance HP&#8217;s own line of networking gear, called ProCurve. HP has been striking deals left and right in an effort to boost its unified [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brocade Pokes Cisco in the Eye, Switches for IBM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brocade Pokes Cisco in the Eye, Switches for IBM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] may further enhance our earnings outlook.&#8221; (Related Posts: How HP can fight Cisco &amp; Win; Cisco&#8217;s Data Center moves to spark M&amp;A)    [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may further enhance our earnings outlook.&#8221; (Related Posts: How HP can fight Cisco &amp; Win; Cisco&#8217;s Data Center moves to spark M&amp;A)    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco and IBM tap partners for acquisitions &#171; Silico Research</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco and IBM tap partners for acquisitions &#171; Silico Research]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and IBM tap partners for&#160;acquisitions  Jump to Comments  Gigaom is reporting that  both Cisco and IBM are looking to current partners as acquisition targets in the escalating [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and IBM tap partners for&nbsp;acquisitions  Jump to Comments  Gigaom is reporting that  both Cisco and IBM are looking to current partners as acquisition targets in the escalating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazen Sadat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mazen Sadat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand that need of companies to grow their services, products and revenue but let’s not forget there is the other side of increased risk, losing focus on core competencies and failure of integration. Big ships can never turn on a dime!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that need of companies to grow their services, products and revenue but let’s not forget there is the other side of increased risk, losing focus on core competencies and failure of integration. Big ships can never turn on a dime!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like if ACN is too expensive, there are others out there. SAY is damaged but I&#039;d imagine still has decent operations infrastructure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like if ACN is too expensive, there are others out there. SAY is damaged but I&#8217;d imagine still has decent operations infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habib Ullah Khan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habib Ullah Khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you are right. And I think if ONLIVE works out Cisco may very well buy that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right. And I think if ONLIVE works out Cisco may very well buy that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Habib, I&#039;ve been thinking and talking to people about Cisco&#039;s overall company story for a while. At the 10,000 foot view if you consider the future of computing as the cloud between content providers (be it movies or business software) and consumers, then Cisco so far wants to have the equipment for the cloud and is slowly trying to control the endpoints in the home. From Layer 1 all the way to Layer 7 the network will run through all of these services and Cisco wants to make sure folks who have Cisco gear all the way down that stack get better performance. It&#039;s the details and holes they have that I need to start thinking about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Habib, I&#8217;ve been thinking and talking to people about Cisco&#8217;s overall company story for a while. At the 10,000 foot view if you consider the future of computing as the cloud between content providers (be it movies or business software) and consumers, then Cisco so far wants to have the equipment for the cloud and is slowly trying to control the endpoints in the home. From Layer 1 all the way to Layer 7 the network will run through all of these services and Cisco wants to make sure folks who have Cisco gear all the way down that stack get better performance. It&#8217;s the details and holes they have that I need to start thinking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Misha, it owns XenSource, but you&#039;re right.  I&#039;ll clarify in the story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Misha, it owns XenSource, but you&#8217;re right.  I&#8217;ll clarify in the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They do have about $33 billion in total cash. I pulled the $7 billion from the company&#039;s domestic cash cited in the report as a potential limiting factor for acquisitions. I should have explained.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do have about $33 billion in total cash. I pulled the $7 billion from the company&#8217;s domestic cash cited in the report as a potential limiting factor for acquisitions. I should have explained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misha Nossik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misha Nossik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citrix &quot;owns&quot; Xen? It&#039;s like saying Red Hat owns Linux...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citrix &#8220;owns&#8221; Xen? It&#8217;s like saying Red Hat owns Linux&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huh?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$7bn in cash?  Don&#039;t you mean...$30bn?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$7bn in cash?  Don&#8217;t you mean&#8230;$30bn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habib Ullah Khan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habib Ullah Khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont know what to say honestly so I&#039;ll say something unoriginal.

The server and networking lines you talk about are yesterday&#039;s battles. We are now talking about what computing will look like in the future. We are obviously standing on a shift as major as when DC architecture&#039;s started moving away from Mainframes.

I&#039;d like to see GigaOM tell me what the new world looks like instead of teaser trailers of the M&amp;A Trilogy with legendary superheroes duking it out for supremacy of Acme-Gotham city!

A few perspectives to start off that train of thought. Cisco has not declared war on the server market, its extending its footprint in networking to include the smallest but fastest growing piece of that pie, the virtualized server niche. This is not a desperate move by John Cambers because he as promised Wall Street growth and has no choice but to take on former partners. It is one more step in the Cisco evolution of selling hardwares in the DC1.0 era to figuring out what will be its SAAS strategy that will lead the entrie company&#039;s strategy. The Unified Computing announcement should be seen in line with its consumer play, its decision to move its Services team to Banglore and its social networking acquisitions. There&#039;s a story there. I&#039;m just not smart enough to figure it out!

Similarly IBM&#039;s Eclipse and Sun&#039;s Java team getting together is as monumental as the everyone ganging up on Bonaparte. There are non server angles to that story and they are the sharpest ones. I&#039;m damn sure its about the Cloud somehow too....

Let&#039;s get on it and figure this out. Its beginning to get murkier then a paramecium pond warming party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know what to say honestly so I&#8217;ll say something unoriginal.</p>
<p>The server and networking lines you talk about are yesterday&#8217;s battles. We are now talking about what computing will look like in the future. We are obviously standing on a shift as major as when DC architecture&#8217;s started moving away from Mainframes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see GigaOM tell me what the new world looks like instead of teaser trailers of the M&amp;A Trilogy with legendary superheroes duking it out for supremacy of Acme-Gotham city!</p>
<p>A few perspectives to start off that train of thought. Cisco has not declared war on the server market, its extending its footprint in networking to include the smallest but fastest growing piece of that pie, the virtualized server niche. This is not a desperate move by John Cambers because he as promised Wall Street growth and has no choice but to take on former partners. It is one more step in the Cisco evolution of selling hardwares in the DC1.0 era to figuring out what will be its SAAS strategy that will lead the entrie company&#8217;s strategy. The Unified Computing announcement should be seen in line with its consumer play, its decision to move its Services team to Banglore and its social networking acquisitions. There&#8217;s a story there. I&#8217;m just not smart enough to figure it out!</p>
<p>Similarly IBM&#8217;s Eclipse and Sun&#8217;s Java team getting together is as monumental as the everyone ganging up on Bonaparte. There are non server angles to that story and they are the sharpest ones. I&#8217;m damn sure its about the Cloud somehow too&#8230;.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get on it and figure this out. Its beginning to get murkier then a paramecium pond warming party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not something that is online, unfortunately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not something that is online, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash Vasudevan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ash Vasudevan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Stacey: Do you have a link to the UBS report?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stacey: Do you have a link to the UBS report?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/24/ciscos-data-center-play-paves-the-way-for-more-ma/#comment-164773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[techie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=43185#comment-164773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM and juniper are already partners... What would IBM gain of acquiring Juniper...?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM and juniper are already partners&#8230; What would IBM gain of acquiring Juniper&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

