23 Comments

Summary:

Today everyone who follows the gaming industry is talking about OnLive, an upcoming service incubated by Rearden, the venture company of Web TV Founder Steve Perlman. The system, which streams high-end video games to pretty much any PC, Mac, or TV with a broadband connection, was […]

onlive_logoToday everyone who follows the gaming industry is talking about OnLive, an upcoming service incubated by Rearden, the venture company of Web TV Founder Steve Perlman. The system, which streams high-end video games to pretty much any PC, Mac, or TV with a broadband connection, was set to be officially unveiled tonight during the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco, but was pushed out earlier after the embargo on it was broken last night.

But can it really turn the gaming industry upside down, the way so many are predicting (as here, here, and here)? I attended a hands-on demo yesterday, and OnLive performed impressively, quickly delivering top games with a great frame rate, in a way that solves multiple problems plaguing large game publishers, such as piracy and low profit margins via retail sales.

However, even assuming the service works that well when it goes live to consumers this winter, at least three factors could hamper its adoption:

onlive-games1

Is U.S. Broadband Ready For This?

While OnLive works with wireless broadband, Perlman acknowledged that running it on a connection shared by multiple users would impede its performance. (“Not a good thing to try at Starbucks,” as he put it.) That may include wireless connections in high-density cities, he added. Perlman told me most OnLive users will likely run the service from suburban homes through their own dedicated connection; still, connectivity complaints from OnLive’s urban customers may mar the service’s reputation in general. (Hardcore gamers are obsessed with low latency, which makes all the difference during multiplayer competition.) Similarly, you have to wonder what broadband providers, which are already introducing service caps, will make of OnLive. I raised this point with Perlman, who told me he’s been assured by broadband providers that his service won’t excessively tax their systems. (He even hinted that OnLive may ultimately partner with some providers to offer package deals.) That may be true, but if OnLive becomes as successful as Perlman hopes, broadband companies may quickly change their tune.

How Will Microsoft and Sony Respond?

Both the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 already have broadband delivery systems of their own; to keep their consumers from jumping to OnLive, my guess is they’ll greatly expand and diversify these offerings. And while OnLive is launching with 10 major publishers, including Electronic Arts and Ubisoft, none of them are Asian. This notable lacuna gives Sony a distinct advantage, as they have established relations with top Japanese developers. OnLive could supplant the Xbox line to become the Western console of choice — but as of this writing, its chances of capturing the market for hardcore Japanese games away from Sony seem slim to none.

How Big Is The Market For Next-Gen Games, Anyway?

OnLive COO Mike McGarvey told me during the demo that the company doesn’t see the Wii as a direct competitor since it doesn’t offer next-generation graphics like the 360 and PS3. (He declined to reveal OnLive’s price point, but said it would be “far less” than Nintendo’s game console, which currently has a $249 MSRP.) And while 360/PS3 fans will definitely be intrigued by OnLive’s awesome graphics, the market is tilting overwhelmingly to the Wii, which has roughly double the install base of those two consoles combined, according to VG Chartz. McGarvey suggested the Wii’s lead is mainly a function of its cheaper price and the novelty of its game controls, but I believe there’s a relatively limited audience of people who actually want next-gen 3D games. (Case in point: While both games were launched at roughly the same time, Wii Fit has outsold Grand Theft Auto IV, and still remains a top seller long after GTA IV has all but dropped off the chart.) OnLive may simply capture the next-gen market away from the 360 and PS3, but remain eclipsed by the all-games-for-all-people appeal of the Wii.

I do hope, however, that OnLive can deliver on its promise. Gaming will never truly be a mass market phenomenon until, like television, it’s accessible to everyone with a display screen. Perlman has assembled a truly remarkable team and technology which may finally succeed in providing just that. Then again, the history of the game industry is rife with products that aimed to overturn everything and in the end, only upended their investors.

Logo and image courtesy OnLive.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Christina Viering Tuesday, March 24, 2009

    Bummer.

  2. This is some wild news for us gamers!!! :-)

  3. It could change the face of network access worldwide. Actually, it’s more or less going to *have* to in order to make it.

    Incidentally, I think it’s now ‘current gen’, not ‘next gen’. Otherwise what shall we call the next generation games when they start to come along?

  4. with more broadband space to add and more people collect more money from the economic fixed who knows Onlive could really take profit and be the biggest player here

  5. » OnLive promises Cloud Gaming Dvorak Uncensored: General interest observations and true web-log. Wednesday, March 25, 2009

    [...] I went looking for the most trustworthy person I can think of writing about gaming – Garnett Lee. At least at time of posting, he’s probably too busy crawling the booths at the GDC to get something in print about this. But, I found this link from Wagner James Au. [...]

  6. Saurabh Kaushik Wednesday, March 25, 2009

    “I am sure it will be cost effective as it will cater to everyone on web compared to just handful who can afford a shining expensive console to lock their life (unless you are fortune company CEO to buy all).”

  7. 1. Who cares about the hardcore japanese market. it’s irrelevant. japan market in decline and publishers dont really care about it
    2. Your being short sighted if this service will only stream hardcore games. it will be even easier to stream indie, casual games b/c of even lower bandwidth requirements. Just b/c they demoed hardcore games initially, doesnt mean it will be only for this demographic.
    3. if not OnLive, it will be someone else to offer this type of service. Cloud computing appears to be on the cusp. Simplistic to think this will be the only player. Regardless, this type of technology has huge implications about the ultimate future of console games as we know it.

  8. Tom te Stroete Wednesday, March 25, 2009

    i DO NOT SUPPORT
    BAAAAAAAAAD ONLIVE BAAAAAAAAAAD

  9. I am not a gamer…. but if this works …i can’t wait to kick some butt!!! Count me in!!!!!!!!!!

  10. This better be the next best thing and live up to the hype!!

  11. SuezanneC Baskerville Thursday, March 26, 2009

    What effect will this have on virtual worlds?

  12. OnLive says it would be difficult for its users to exceed the monthly bandwidth caps that Internet service providers are increasingly placing on their subscribers. A typical user would have to play about 284 hours – nearly 12 full days – to consume Comcast Corp.’s 250-gigabyte cap. Nielsen Co. estimates many gamers play roughly 60 hours a month.

    http://technology.canoe.ca/2009/03/24/8870281-ap.html

  13. microsoft will prevent onlive to work on pc’s

  14. I dont think this will pan out due to potential bandwith problems.

    BUT, more importantly think of what this would do to the technology wars on both PC’s and Consoles. Where would they get their money to develop new tech if no consumers are buying the hardware. Most likely from game development companies who want the latest and greatest stuff to develop on. So the game devs will then seek more revenue to offset the payouts and the money lost from not selling boxed products. So where do THEY get the money? Through huge fees placed on the consumers through the telcom companies for your broadband access and ADVERTISEMENTS. This EA game is brought to you by Pepsi!

  15. I personally think this WILL change the gaming industry… crazy how in a couple months we’ll be able to play Crysis in HD on any ol’ laptop!

    -Alex, OnLive info / forums http://www.onlive1.com

  16. Also Perlman did mention that the problems of latency has been solved…

    -Alex, OnLive info / forums http://www.onlive1.com

  17. If OnLive can pull this off not only will it change the world of gaming, but it will change the world of thin clients as well. Think about how this technology would change the application hosting, the PC market and cloud computing. No longer would you need to buy expensive hardware, just use your cheap netbook and get quad core performance.

    I hope I get in on the beta!

  18. Man, I get all my games for free now using Torrents. This would suck!

  19. man if this works it could quite possibly be the best thing that happened to gaming since it was invented but the question is will it work with millions playing at once? we wont know til open beta i guess

  20. this is good advise but it doesnt work!!!

  21. Big fan! And now it seems that AT&T and Verizon are looking to emulate what it is that OnLive looks to be doing…

  22. First off: I don’t think they can pull this off (AT FIRST) with out any hitches. Gamers like myself will accept absolutely no lag. We don’t want long loading and saving times. It also seems every single game they have available, I have already beaten, or simply don’t want. They have to have today’s brand new games. Mass Effect 2 is already old news and it came out 2 months ago. This could be good. I see some potential. I also like owning a console. Its very personal for me. MY CONSOLE. I have my background I want, I have the color console I want. I have my profile. I have my files I downloaded. My games installed. It feels like mine.

  23. Is this the same OnLive corp that created OnLive Traveler in the 1990s?

Comments have been disabled for this post