<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why IBM Should Buy Sun: Cloud Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open source community reacts to Oracle-Sun deal &#124; Results videos photos news blogs At I google wiki . com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open source community reacts to Oracle-Sun deal &#124; Results videos photos news blogs At I google wiki . com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology thoughts on the Oracle-Sun Deal - if your into that kinda thing. : Jamie Jackson XP</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Technology thoughts on the Oracle-Sun Deal - if your into that kinda thing. : Jamie Jackson XP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open source community reacts to Oracle-Sun deal - Enterprise Linux Log</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open source community reacts to Oracle-Sun deal - Enterprise Linux Log]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle to Buy Sun (and MySQL) for $7.4B [GigaOM] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oracle to Buy Sun (and MySQL) for $7.4B [GigaOM] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle to Buy Sun (and MySQL) for $7.4B [GigaOM] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oracle to Buy Sun (and MySQL) for $7.4B [GigaOM] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle &#38; Sun To Merge&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oracle &#38; Sun To Merge&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one fell swoop became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle To Buy Sun For $7.4 Billion &#124; Non Stop 24</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oracle To Buy Sun For $7.4 Billion &#124; Non Stop 24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one wide sweep became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one wide sweep became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle To Buy Sun For $7.4 Billion</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oracle To Buy Sun For $7.4 Billion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one wide sweep became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle found itself yet another bargain and in one wide sweep became a worthy competitor to IBM. It allows Oracle to become a player in the cloud computing business. More importantly, the company ends up acquiring MySQL, the upstart database that has been viewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun-IBM Merger Hits A Snag</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sun-IBM Merger Hits A Snag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 04:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of engineering excellence. Stacey believes that the two companies, if combined, could become serious players in cloud computing. In March this year, Sun announced plans to sell its own cloud services. In my view, IBM is getting [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of engineering excellence. Stacey believes that the two companies, if combined, could become serious players in cloud computing. In March this year, Sun announced plans to sell its own cloud services. In my view, IBM is getting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveshields</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daveshields]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See

http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/ibm-buying-sun-would-be-great-news-for-linux-java-and-open-office/

and my earlier post

http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2009/03/19/why-ibm-should-buy-sun/

thanks,dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See</p>
<p><a href="http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/ibm-buying-sun-would-be-great-news-for-linux-java-and-open-office/" rel="nofollow">http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/ibm-buying-sun-would-be-great-news-for-linux-java-and-open-office/</a></p>
<p>and my earlier post</p>
<p><a href="http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2009/03/19/why-ibm-should-buy-sun/" rel="nofollow">http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2009/03/19/why-ibm-should-buy-sun/</a></p>
<p>thanks,dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alastair]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;d be a fantastic waste of $6.5B if cloud technology &amp; support is all they want from Sun.

I&#039;m not saying there might not be other good reasons for them to want Sun&#039;s technology (and technologists - more to the point) but I think that cloud on its own is not good enough reason.

Sun is a once great company, and I enjoyed my time working for them. I think they need a massive restructuring of management to survive - I hope they can do that somehow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;d be a fantastic waste of $6.5B if cloud technology &amp; support is all they want from Sun.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying there might not be other good reasons for them to want Sun&#8217;s technology (and technologists &#8211; more to the point) but I think that cloud on its own is not good enough reason.</p>
<p>Sun is a once great company, and I enjoyed my time working for them. I think they need a massive restructuring of management to survive &#8211; I hope they can do that somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM + Sun = Good, or Bad, for Green?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IBM + Sun = Good, or Bad, for Green?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stacey has pointed out over at GigaOM, there&#8217;s a lot of potential for synergy between IBM and Sun&#8217;s cloud computing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stacey has pointed out over at GigaOM, there&#8217;s a lot of potential for synergy between IBM and Sun&#8217;s cloud computing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco&#8217;s Data Center Play Paves the Way for More M&#38;A</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco&#8217;s Data Center Play Paves the Way for More M&#38;A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] will compete with offerings primarily from HP and IBM. A few days later, rumors circulated that IBM might buy Sun Microsystems for $6.5 billion (or that maybe Cisco should). And as these tech titans fight for supremacy of the data center, at [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will compete with offerings primarily from HP and IBM. A few days later, rumors circulated that IBM might buy Sun Microsystems for $6.5 billion (or that maybe Cisco should). And as these tech titans fight for supremacy of the data center, at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud compliance: Will PCI be applied to cloud computing by the FTC? - IT Compliance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cloud compliance: Will PCI be applied to cloud computing by the FTC? - IT Compliance Advisor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all, that IBM is in talks to buy Sun Microsystems. Why? GigaOm thinks IBM wants to bolster its cloud computing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all, that IBM is in talks to buy Sun Microsystems. Why? GigaOm thinks IBM wants to bolster its cloud computing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elefantenhochzeit: IBM will Sun Microsystems übernehmen &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadgets. Smart TechNews.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elefantenhochzeit: IBM will Sun Microsystems übernehmen &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadgets. Smart TechNews.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why IBM Should Buy Sun: Cloud Services    Share and Enjoy: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why IBM Should Buy Sun: Cloud Services    Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM is in Talks to Buy Sun; the Logical Consequence of All-Out War for Data Center, Says WSJ &#124; domain names &#124;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/18/why-ibm-should-buy-sun-cloud-services/#comment-164147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IBM is in Talks to Buy Sun; the Logical Consequence of All-Out War for Data Center, Says WSJ &#124; domain names &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=42758#comment-164147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IBM&#8217;s potential purchase of Sun: Here&#8217;s why it makes sense ZDNet, Mar.18.2009 Why IBM Should Buy Sun: Cloud Services GigaOm, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IBM&#8217;s potential purchase of Sun: Here&#8217;s why it makes sense ZDNet, Mar.18.2009 Why IBM Should Buy Sun: Cloud Services GigaOm, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

