Amidst the noise being generated by those attending and reporting on the SXSW conference, I caught wind of a particularly interesting announcement made by BatchBlue and some other web service providers about a “Small Business Web” of integrated SaaS products designed for small business. “The Small […]

Amidst the noise being generated by those attending and reporting on the SXSW conference, I caught wind of a particularly interesting announcement made by BatchBlue and some other web service providers about a “Small Business Web” of integrated SaaS products designed for small business.

“The Small Business Web is a movement to bring together like-minded, customer-obsessed software companies to integrate our respective products and make life easier for small businesses,” Pamela O’Hara, CEO of BatchBlue, told me via email.

By using the APIs, or Application Programming Interfaces, present in each other’s products, the participating companies hope to offer a very high level of integration between their services. This will allow each company to focus on its own core competency, while allowing for easier data portability and a better overall experience for the user.

We’ve already seen companies make use of APIs to allow for some level of integration: most time tracking applications allow for import from a Basecamp project, for example. This new initiative is seemingly taking this to a whole new level and is essentially looking to offer a suite of mix-and-match services that will work together to provide a higher level of interaction to offer the functionality you need.

The initial batch of participating companies include WebWorkerDaily favorites such as FreshBooks, Shoeboxed, Outright, MailChimp and, of course, BatchBlue, and there is a good level of integration between these products already in place.

My initial reaction to the announcement was a good one. As someone who promotes efficiency in business process, needing to do duplicate data entry in multiple systems has always been a sticky issue. The more that the tools I use interact to keep data in sync, the less time my team has to spend to do so manually.

A potential stalling point is the cost involved in this mix-and-match approach. At what point does it make sense to consider a more integrated solution rather than lumping individual products together? I can (and do) justify the cost of a couple of these services but when I start combining $10 here with $14 there across five or six different products it has the potential to become prohibitively expensive for a small business.

It will mean that we may need to reevaluate our providers to see if this interaction offers a benefit that would make switching services worthwhile. I’ve long been a proponent of the BatchBook CRM, but I recently moved my invoicing from FreshBooks to Cashboard. Do the advantages offered in this new mashup make it worth it to return to FreshBooks?

Of course, these are decisions that one must make in any case, and the increased integration does make the use of these unique services more appealing, but for a small team to spend upwards of $1,000 a year on SaaS products is a considerable investment. Perhaps a plan to discount the cost of services when you combine them could be implemented.

The initial group of participants announced is certainly a compelling assortment of applications and services. My hope is that the options will continue to grow and that it won’t be exclusionary. For this to be successful, we need to be able to choose between competing applications within a space.

I would also like to know more about what the criteria is for inclusion as a provider. Is there a baseline of functionality needed? Is there a formal process or a commitment of some sort? I am sure more info will be forthcoming. So while it is still early for this movement, I’m hopefully optimistic about the possibilities of the Small Business Web initiative. Offering nice benefits in efficiency and productivity to those of us who use web-based products is a good thing.

What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments.

  1. Thanks for the writeup Scott.

    I’d like to assure you and your readers that more and more providers will be joining us. One of our core values is opening up our users data so they can use it in creative and innovative ways.

    We will post more details about the movement after SXSW but The Small Business Web is a manifesto rather than an old boy’s club.

    Ben Curren
    CTO and Co-Founder Outright.com – Simple online bookkeeping

  2. Thanks for the reassurance Ben. I like the manifesto concept, and am certainly eager to see how this pans out.


  3. One thing which strikes me as someone who advises smb’s. Usability and attention to simplicity is often better from smaller concentrated app providers than larger A-Z offerings. This in one of the reason I can put up with multiple entry at times. Because you are using their flag ship you get better attention to detail. You may also get better support. I really like Batchblues support.
    The issues I see, are cost, as Scott said, and different interfaces. But I would say both can be mitigated with thought.

    I will watch this with interest.

  4. Great article Scott. As a small business owner, trying to get the full picture of what’s going on in my business can be difficult, and using a myriad of online applications that don’t fully integrate, or cannot give me the full picture, can make things more difficult. A number of months ago I decided to build an integrated suite of applications – the ADS AppSuite. We chose this route over building a dashboard on top of other services, so that we could get a consistent look and feel across all applications, provide tight integration between then, and then put a dashboard on top of that. Each of these apps can be used by itself, however the integration that we are working on, combined with Google-style single sign-on, will provide business owners a much better alternative that using many applications that all look and work differently.

    In general though, I am curious to see where others take it.

    Thanks again for a great article.

  5. It’s still very early days in the SaaS world, but the way I see it is that companies will adopt those products that allow them to save money, grow revenues, increase efficiency, speed up a process or achieve other business objectives. I work with small businesses on their internet and marketing functions and we only put a web app in place if there’s a genuine business benefit from it, and it doesn’t detract from the business focus.

    The great thing about SaaS is that it enables small businesses to benefit from technology that was previously out of reach due to technical and financial restraints – and they enable breakthrough business strategies in the most unexpected markets. It’s an exciting time for small business.

    I would expect web apps providers forming alliances with an end-to-end solution for specified industries and markets to become the norm sooner rather than later.

    At the moment, I’m enjoying seeing such creativity and function around in abundance with the myriad of apps, growing each day – it’s a fascinating time to be around the Internet right now.


  6. Thanks for the mention of Cashboard in the article. Connecting to other services is vital for small business web apps, which is why we decided to partner with quality services like Basecamp from day 1.

    We’ve been planning a public API for a long time, but at the moment we’re really trying to nail our core feature set before it comes out.

    We will have an extensive API this year, along with many tools that will make sticking with us worthwhile.

    Thanks for your patience.

    – Seth / founder, designer Cashboard

  7. One other stumbling block: if you choose and rely on one of the providers, and they end up closing shop, you are left holding the bag.

    With so many moving parts involved, this is bound to happen. I am not sure that the web of services will be able to sustain a solid following when one provider can pull it all together for a business.

  8. Very interesting stuff. I truly believe that integration is the future of all this kind of saas apps. I really want to know more. My company is building an email marketing app and I would like to know how to join this movement.

  9. [...] Chrome Beta, now twice as fast. (jkOnTheRun) YouTube to bring in $500 MM this year? (NewTeeVee) Is the small business web the next big thing? (WebWorkerDaily) Emerging water technology to boom by 2020 (Earth2Tech) [...]

  10. Great concept however execution is the big deal here. Who will take ownership of the Online Federation”
    Intuit ?? Cisco Webex?? Salesforce? EMC Mozy??

    Who will provide for data backup ,sync and recovery of content as need arises for the aggregated mashup offer.


Comments have been disabled for this post