4 Comments

Summary:

Google’s opposition to proposed new UK music rates, which led to YouTube blocking music videos in the UK this week, may look like just publi…

Google’s opposition to proposed new UK music rates, which led to YouTube blocking music videos in the UK this week, may look like just public posturing, as private negotiations continue. But it’s only one instance of what may become an increasingly fractious tug ‘o war between online services and the music business in the next few months.

Almost uniquely, YouTube’s 2007 blanket deal with main UK royalty collector PRS For Music was inked outside of the “joint online license” framework (JOL), through which the royalty society mandates most digital services. But, just as YouTube’s special deal has ended, so, too, the JOL, which was also implemented in 2007, is due to expire June 30. PRS wouldn’t say what will happen after that date — but, behind the scenes, many more services than YouTube alone have been lobbying hard for a new deal.

“Everybody is; the rates don’t allow you to create an economic model that makes sense,” said We7 CEO Steve Purdham, whose site pays 0.22 pence per track transferred under PRS’ online license. Forrester music analyst Mark Mulligan said: “PRS, right across the board, are upping their fees, like those charged to Oldham Athletic for goal celebrations. This had to happen sooner or later as the labels are going to be applying pressure to PRS. But when the YouTube deal is finally sorted, that won’t be the end of it, they’ll be revising the contracts again, this is not the endgame.” Find out why at our sister site paidContentUK

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. I begin to question Friday, March 13, 2009

    What I'm even a member for if after each week I have to guess why the clips I playlisted or favorited are dropping like flies. A lot of twitting going on.

    Give me and a few million others a decent break. We're sick of this hooliganism.

  2. brendan b brown Friday, March 13, 2009

    This is such a cluster fuck…..How does this not boil down to an American company refusing to pay royalties? Do they want music to fail?

    bbb
    wheatus

  3. Staci D. Kramer Friday, March 13, 2009

    @brendan b brown I don't think that's a fair conclusion. The argument as far as I can tell isn't over the idea of compensation — it's about how much and how to make it happen. Also, you may have noticed there are some UK companies that aren't too thrilled either.

  4. john (london) Friday, March 13, 2009

    Check out http://www.muzu.tv as a great alternative that is fully licensed by the prs and is a better site for watching music videos.

Comments have been disabled for this post