<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Google Be Added to the Dow?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Google Be Added to the Dow? &#124; Kevin Kelleher &#124; Voices &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should Google Be Added to the Dow? &#124; Kevin Kelleher &#124; Voices &#124; AllThingsD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read the rest of this post   Print  all_things_di220:http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090311/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/ SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Should Google Be Added to the Dow?&quot;, url: &quot;http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090311/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/&quot; }); Sphere Comment  Tagged: Google, Internet, Voices, econalypse, Apple, Bank of America, bankruptcy, Citigroup, Dow Jones Newswire, GigaOm, government, investors, Kevin Kelleher, Reuters, shareholders, stock, user-generated content, Visa &#124; permalink [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this post   Print  all_things_di220:<a href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090311/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/" rel="nofollow">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090311/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/</a> SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Should Google Be Added to the Dow?&#8221;, url: &#8220;http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090311/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/&#8221; }); Sphere Comment  Tagged: Google, Internet, Voices, econalypse, Apple, Bank of America, bankruptcy, Citigroup, Dow Jones Newswire, GigaOm, government, investors, Kevin Kelleher, Reuters, shareholders, stock, user-generated content, Visa | permalink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kelleher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great points, Chris. But let me add a couple of things.

The things that Google is good at - search, video, &quot;organizing information&quot; - can be done by other companies, but those things are important to the economy and not represented in the Dow right now. Adding Yahoo doesn&#039;t make sense, nor does letting live.com hold the search banner when it has such a puny market share.

If American Express or Disney or McDonald&#039;s disappeared, I suppose we&#039;d muddle along okay as well. But how would most of our individual lives be affected if Google went away and took its share of the cloud (and the stuff we keep there) on it? For me, it would be more noticeable than not having a McFlurry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points, Chris. But let me add a couple of things.</p>
<p>The things that Google is good at &#8211; search, video, &#8220;organizing information&#8221; &#8211; can be done by other companies, but those things are important to the economy and not represented in the Dow right now. Adding Yahoo doesn&#8217;t make sense, nor does letting live.com hold the search banner when it has such a puny market share.</p>
<p>If American Express or Disney or McDonald&#8217;s disappeared, I suppose we&#8217;d muddle along okay as well. But how would most of our individual lives be affected if Google went away and took its share of the cloud (and the stuff we keep there) on it? For me, it would be more noticeable than not having a McFlurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t want to come across as diminishing the significance of Google&#039;s achievements, but it will probably come across that way regardless. I would say leave them out of the Dow.

The DJIA should be our industrial anchors that make up our economy. If Google disappeared tomorrow, would the world still survive if we all had to search using live.com or yahoo.com? I think so. Can&#039;t really say the same for Cisco as they have a tangible product embedded into virtually every corner of the world and is powering virtually every type of business.

Cisco seems to make a lot more sense than Google as a Dow component.... although Google&#039;s clever innovations are admittedly much more interesting and fun to play around with. Maybe revisit Google in 5-10 years, after a lot of their incubations have had time to succeed or fail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to come across as diminishing the significance of Google&#8217;s achievements, but it will probably come across that way regardless. I would say leave them out of the Dow.</p>
<p>The DJIA should be our industrial anchors that make up our economy. If Google disappeared tomorrow, would the world still survive if we all had to search using live.com or yahoo.com? I think so. Can&#8217;t really say the same for Cisco as they have a tangible product embedded into virtually every corner of the world and is powering virtually every type of business.</p>
<p>Cisco seems to make a lot more sense than Google as a Dow component&#8230;. although Google&#8217;s clever innovations are admittedly much more interesting and fun to play around with. Maybe revisit Google in 5-10 years, after a lot of their incubations have had time to succeed or fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change Your Life for Better</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Change Your Life for Better]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that Google is holding up well during this massive selloff. Now actually the entire market itself has not started the next leg down seriously.

There is time for serious market crashes. Then what will happen to Google. It too will lose its market capital value. Percentage wise it has done well. We cannot compare Google with Citigroup which is a penny stock only knowing how to burn cash of the poor people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Google is holding up well during this massive selloff. Now actually the entire market itself has not started the next leg down seriously.</p>
<p>There is time for serious market crashes. Then what will happen to Google. It too will lose its market capital value. Percentage wise it has done well. We cannot compare Google with Citigroup which is a penny stock only knowing how to burn cash of the poor people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kelleher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@austin and @michael. According to Dow Jones, Charles Dow&#039;s original vision for the was pretty simple. &quot;He compared his average to placing sticks in the beach sand to determine, wave after successive wave, whether the tide was coming in or going out. If the average&#039;s peaks and troughs rose progressively higher then a bull market prevailed; if the peaks and troughs dropped lower and lower, a bear market was on.&quot; http://www.djaverages.com/?view=industrial&amp;page=overview

Google is still very young and has a relatively short history of growth. It could slow down, but so could Microsoft, Intel and IBM. But which tech stocks do a better job of being one of those sticks in the sand today? Google has, to use a different metaphor, been a bellwether stock ever since it went public. I suspect the WSJ editors would agree with your more cautious views, but I just think Google would make the average show more accurately what&#039;s changing in the economy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@austin and @michael. According to Dow Jones, Charles Dow&#8217;s original vision for the was pretty simple. &#8220;He compared his average to placing sticks in the beach sand to determine, wave after successive wave, whether the tide was coming in or going out. If the average&#8217;s peaks and troughs rose progressively higher then a bull market prevailed; if the peaks and troughs dropped lower and lower, a bear market was on.&#8221; <a href="http://www.djaverages.com/?view=industrial&#038;page=overview" rel="nofollow">http://www.djaverages.com/?view=industrial&#038;page=overview</a></p>
<p>Google is still very young and has a relatively short history of growth. It could slow down, but so could Microsoft, Intel and IBM. But which tech stocks do a better job of being one of those sticks in the sand today? Google has, to use a different metaphor, been a bellwether stock ever since it went public. I suspect the WSJ editors would agree with your more cautious views, but I just think Google would make the average show more accurately what&#8217;s changing in the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure it is, Austin.

With the stranglehold they have over online advertising dollars, Google is going to be solid for a long, long time to come.

That said, I don&#039;t think should be added to the DOW. Other software giants, techs have done fine on the NASDAQ. The DOW is gonna get worse before it gets better, and I don&#039;t really think it would benefit Google tremendously to start taking trades there amid one of the biggest sell-offs in history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure it is, Austin.</p>
<p>With the stranglehold they have over online advertising dollars, Google is going to be solid for a long, long time to come.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t think should be added to the DOW. Other software giants, techs have done fine on the NASDAQ. The DOW is gonna get worse before it gets better, and I don&#8217;t really think it would benefit Google tremendously to start taking trades there amid one of the biggest sell-offs in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austinandrew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[austinandrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;demonstrates sustained growth&quot;

10 years of results does not demonstrate sustained growth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;demonstrates sustained growth&#8221;</p>
<p>10 years of results does not demonstrate sustained growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serwis komputerowy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serwis komputerowy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the crisis is always a growth.
The share price has always increased and decreased to normal, but when the puzzle.
Good luck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the crisis is always a growth.<br />
The share price has always increased and decreased to normal, but when the puzzle.<br />
Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swag Valance</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swag Valance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like window dressing for the Dow, if you asked me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like window dressing for the Dow, if you asked me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web2Crawl</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/03/10/should-google-be-added-to-the-dow/#comment-163130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web2Crawl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41951#comment-163130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wateva they do.. it aint gonna help, as of now.

After a few months everything will be back on track.

All this recession is just artificially created bubble, which has to burst sooner or later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wateva they do.. it aint gonna help, as of now.</p>
<p>After a few months everything will be back on track.</p>
<p>All this recession is just artificially created bubble, which has to burst sooner or later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

