5 Comments

Summary:

Former Vice President and cleantech VC Al Gore has a new catch phrase that combines two of his favorite interests — energy and the Internet. At the Wall Street Journal Eco:nomics conference in Santa Barbara, Calif. Thursday afternoon he said a couple times (in a couple […]

algoreimageFormer Vice President and cleantech VC Al Gore has a new catch phrase that combines two of his favorite interests — energy and the Internet. At the Wall Street Journal Eco:nomics conference in Santa Barbara, Calif. Thursday afternoon he said a couple times (in a couple different ways) that a new electric superhighway will do for energy what the Internet did for information: basically, use the network to revolutionize it.

The comparison between the two industries has been kicked around as long as the energy industry has been talking about the smart grid, smart meters and building-out power transmission infrastructure. But it’s even more timely today. This afternoon Senator Harry Reid unveiled a proposal to invest in building out an electrical transmission network that can connect clean power, like solar and wind, generated in remote areas to the greater smart grid.

Reid’s proposal for building power lines to connect clean power to the larger grid — what he called an electric superhighway — is expected to be added into the upcoming energy bill. At the Wall Street Journal conference Gore said he hopes to see the upcoming energy bill, and Reid’s electric superhighway portion, debated in Congress in the next few months. The renewable energy industry is happy about Reid’s plan — The American Wind Energy Association said in an emailed statement that it looks forward to working with Reid to form a consensus over: “interconnection-wide planning, interconnection-wide cost allocation, and consolidated permitting.”

At the conference Gore took the information/energy networks comparison a step farther. He noted that the Internet started out with large stations serving as centralized connection points, and said that the energy network will slowly move from centralized generation to distributed generation. As the Internet was built out “the computing power was shifted to the periphery — the same thing will happen to renewable energy.”

But boosting distributed clean power generation will take a long time, Gore said, and we don’t have time to wait. That’s because renewable power is just too expensive right now. Other panelists, like PG&E’s CEO Peter Darbee, pointed out throughout the day that rooftop solar panels are just far more expensive than centralized solar power plants. It was cheap computing and Moore’s law that delivered the shift to distributed computing at the edge of the network from a more centralized system. But given there’s just not the equivalent force pushing down the cost of renewables, who knows how long will it take clean power to follow suit.

Image courtesy of wikimedia.

  1. This plan to run power transmission lines with no regard for environmental concerns is reckless and unthinking. The sun shines just as brightly near existing energy corridors. This is akin to building a Denny’s and then running a highway to it. Totally irresponsible energy policy. Shocking that it would even be proposed.

    Share
  2. Sorry, Russell, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

    A significant portion of core generation of alternative energy is going to continue to be wind-generated. Right now, it’s the leading component. And wind – really is geography-dependent.

    Though I live in a state capable of being a net wind energy exporter, test show my on back meadow not to be such a great place to site a wind generator. It will work well for solar, though – and eventually shall.

    Most of that high-wind generating capacity isn’t anywhere near existing transmission lines.

    Share
  3. Chuck Brody Friday, March 6, 2009

    I probably don’t know what I’m talking about either (yet), so I’ll pose this as a question: does the preoccupation with proximity to power lines reflect a set of assumptions about energy generation and distribution that might be “old” thinking? I see a lot of press and investment in “industrial scale” deployments of alternate or renewable energy, but why is that more efficient / effective than decentralizing the model? Understandably the incumbents and our default infrastructure reflect a centralized production model, which itself facilitates controlling the revenue stream, but that’s only one paradigm.

    What’s infeasible about reducing (not eliminating) the draw on the incumbent infrastructure by deploying micro-local supplements that become “primary” for specific subsets of consumption (e.g., IT equipment)? It’s not that different from applying geothermal to a heating/cooling system to reduce the total temperature swing that the conventional system has to handle.

    Where’s the flaw in my thinking?

    Share
  4. [...] rumbling beneath the surface here in the United States: Democrats like Harry Reid and Al Gore have talked up the need for a "electric superhighway," large new high-voltage transmission lines that [...]

    Share
  5. you make a good point but i must dissagree

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post