<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless Scorecard, Recession Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wireless Scorecard, We Heart Data Edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wireless Scorecard, We Heart Data Edition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stacey Higginbotham  &#124; Thursday, May 7, 2009 &#124; 8:58 AM PT &#124; 0 comments    It&#8217;s been a rough first three months of the year for the economy, but while overall subscriber growth at wireless carriers stayed pretty stable, wireless data revenue continued to climb. AT&amp;T&#8217;s reliance on the iPhone was once again made clear, as was Sprint&#8217;s difficulty holding onto postpaid subscribers (although thanks to its $50 unlimited prepaid plan offered by its Boost Mobile subsidiary, it gained prepaid subscribers on its iDEN network).The biggest changes during the first quarter of the year were T-Mobile&#8217;s slowdown in gaining new subscribers, and Verizon&#8217;s subscriber spike brought on by the closing of the Alltel acquisition. To mark another change &#8212; the growth of prepaid providers &#8212; we&#8217;re adding data from MetroPCS and Leap Wireless to the scorecard. We&#8217;ll post Leap&#8217;s this afternoon, but note that both providers sell only prepaid services rather than contract services like the national carriers do. For reference, check out our Q4 2008 scorecard. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stacey Higginbotham  | Thursday, May 7, 2009 | 8:58 AM PT | 0 comments    It&#8217;s been a rough first three months of the year for the economy, but while overall subscriber growth at wireless carriers stayed pretty stable, wireless data revenue continued to climb. AT&amp;T&#8217;s reliance on the iPhone was once again made clear, as was Sprint&#8217;s difficulty holding onto postpaid subscribers (although thanks to its $50 unlimited prepaid plan offered by its Boost Mobile subsidiary, it gained prepaid subscribers on its iDEN network).The biggest changes during the first quarter of the year were T-Mobile&#8217;s slowdown in gaining new subscribers, and Verizon&#8217;s subscriber spike brought on by the closing of the Alltel acquisition. To mark another change &#8212; the growth of prepaid providers &#8212; we&#8217;re adding data from MetroPCS and Leap Wireless to the scorecard. We&#8217;ll post Leap&#8217;s this afternoon, but note that both providers sell only prepaid services rather than contract services like the national carriers do. For reference, check out our Q4 2008 scorecard. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wireless Provider Scorecard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wireless Provider Scorecard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GigaOm has gathered financial results of major U.S. carriers. AT&amp;T and Verizon are the obvious leaders. The iPhone has definitely helped AT&amp;T to retain and gain new customers. Below is a copy and paste. Original data here: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOm has gathered financial results of major U.S. carriers. AT&amp;T and Verizon are the obvious leaders. The iPhone has definitely helped AT&amp;T to retain and gain new customers. Below is a copy and paste. Original data here: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetworkIP Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Remaining Optimistic About CTIA &#8216;09</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NetworkIP Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Remaining Optimistic About CTIA &#8216;09]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] late February ‘09, Stacey Higginbotham of GigaOM assembled a Wireless Scorecard based on Q4 ’08 statistics from AT&amp;T, T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon. Based on Stacey’s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] late February ‘09, Stacey Higginbotham of GigaOM assembled a Wireless Scorecard based on Q4 ’08 statistics from AT&amp;T, T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon. Based on Stacey’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telephony&#8217;s Tale of The Tape: Shrinking Telecoms</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Telephony&#8217;s Tale of The Tape: Shrinking Telecoms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] line – preferably mobile, and preferably from lower cost mobile providers such as Metro PCS and T-Mobile. My belief is that telcos are in a race against time, and these landline losses are their Achilles [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] line – preferably mobile, and preferably from lower cost mobile providers such as Metro PCS and T-Mobile. My belief is that telcos are in a race against time, and these landline losses are their Achilles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kirk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Kirk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good info for all of us Stacey. Might you have additional data pointing to how the niche MVNOs (Cricket, TracPhone, GoPhone, Virgin, etc) are doing? Are the all-you-can-eat rate plans making anyone any money or are they just a way of attracting new subscribers in hopes of making a buck down the road?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good info for all of us Stacey. Might you have additional data pointing to how the niche MVNOs (Cricket, TracPhone, GoPhone, Virgin, etc) are doing? Are the all-you-can-eat rate plans making anyone any money or are they just a way of attracting new subscribers in hopes of making a buck down the road?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GigaOM Interview: MetroPCS COO Tom Keys &#124; The Click</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The GigaOM Interview: MetroPCS COO Tom Keys &#124; The Click]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a total of 5.4 million subscribers, MetroPCS is still much smaller than T-Mobile, the smallest of the nationwide carriers in the U.S. However, MetroPCS has an annual revenue per user, or ARPU, of $40, compared to a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a total of 5.4 million subscribers, MetroPCS is still much smaller than T-Mobile, the smallest of the nationwide carriers in the U.S. However, MetroPCS has an annual revenue per user, or ARPU, of $40, compared to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GigaOM Interview: MetroPCS COO Tom Keys,</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The GigaOM Interview: MetroPCS COO Tom Keys,]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a total of 5.4 million subscribers, MetroPCS is still much smaller than T-Mobile, the smallest of the nationwide carriers in the U.S. However, MetroPCS has an annual revenue per user, or ARPU, of $40, compared to a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a total of 5.4 million subscribers, MetroPCS is still much smaller than T-Mobile, the smallest of the nationwide carriers in the U.S. However, MetroPCS has an annual revenue per user, or ARPU, of $40, compared to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Fleckhiemer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Fleckhiemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could you do a EOY2008 summary?  Also, what about the Tier 2s?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you do a EOY2008 summary?  Also, what about the Tier 2s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Did Your (US) Carrier Do in Q4 2008? at Hellfire Empire - Wireless</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Did Your (US) Carrier Do in Q4 2008? at Hellfire Empire - Wireless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stacy at GigaOm was kind enough to round up the Q4 numbers for the top 4 US carriers. I think it tells you quite a bit about where your carrier stands and how they rank so I thought I would share. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stacy at GigaOm was kind enough to round up the Q4 numbers for the top 4 US carriers. I think it tells you quite a bit about where your carrier stands and how they rank so I thought I would share. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Did Your (US) Carrier Do in Q4 2008? &#124; BerryReview.com &#187;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Did Your (US) Carrier Do in Q4 2008? &#124; BerryReview.com &#187;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stacy at GigaOm was kind enough to round up the Q4 numbers for the top 4 US carriers. I think it tells you quite a bit about where your carrier stands and how they rank so I thought I would share. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stacy at GigaOm was kind enough to round up the Q4 numbers for the top 4 US carriers. I think it tells you quite a bit about where your carrier stands and how they rank so I thought I would share. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kesavk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/27/wireless-scorecard-recession-edition/#comment-162206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kesavk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=41152#comment-162206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about MetroPCS and Cricket ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about MetroPCS and Cricket ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

