7 Comments

Summary:

While it seems strange to have someone from search giant Google (NSDQ: GOOG) brought on to defend display, David Rosenblatt, president, Disp…

imageWhile it seems strange to have someone from search giant Google (NSDQ: GOOG) brought on to defend display, David Rosenblatt, president, Display Advertising for Google, did have some positive things to say about that format. But mainly, it was a pitch for his company’s approach to saving that marketplace.

Japanese toilet paper: If you don’t grow demand as inventory piles up, it’s hard to maintain prices, Rosenblatt said, adding that that is no ultimate judgment on the underlying value of the media display ads support. “It’s hard to buy when their are over 1- to 2 million publishers. It spawns a huge number of vendors and third-party specialists, for reporting, optimization and workflow. Each one of these companies brings its own methods, staffs and costs. It reminds me of a joke about the Japanese distribution system: it takes 15 companies to put a roll of toilet paper in a consumer’s hands.

Google’s approach: The ad exchange extends the AdSense marketplace. It’s neutral and will support all formats, not just text, which has been Google’s mainstay. Not just the auction method, but reservations-based buying. We launched a new design tool for display ads in October. “What we found was that 80 percent of those who used that program never bought display before.”

Don’t bash technology: Rosenblatt began his talk alluding to MSLO co-CEO Wenda Harris Millard’s warning at the conference on Sunday that science had eclipsed art in the online ad business. He argued that it was a false dichotomy to say you have to choose between the two or that technology shouldn’t direct the art an advertiser uses in crafting a message.

Google loves agencies: Addressing the “frenemy/froe” issue in its sometimes wary view from ad agencies, Roseblatt insisted that “Google loves agencies; we work with them all and they understand brands better than anyone.” But, because Google is extremely focused on efficiency, Roseblatt’s argument went, agencies often misinterpret that rigor as a threat to their model. Secondly, Google isn’t interested in commoditizing media. “We manage tens of billions of display ads and our monetization efforts have been devised in concert with our publisher partners. That allows publishers to realize the highest yield possible. And one small point, last year, we wrote $6 billion in checks to publisher partners.

  1. BodyLanguageReader Tuesday, February 24, 2009

    I thought it was funny that David asked himself the question "are we a friend or an enemy of the agencies", then gave the most awkwardly over-prepared response, and right after that he very visibly rubbed his nose. If there's video, you should watch it.

    Share
  2. inagreement withBLR Tuesday, February 24, 2009

    yea, he's a pretty major tool that's so out of touch with the industry.

    Share
  3. It's not *that* strange that they're defending display ads — after all, they do own DoubleClick and a part of their business is selling display ads through their network as well.

    Share
  4. David is a smart gentleman, but his speech was silly and defensive. It is obvious that Google is having a hard time justifying the purchase of Doubleclick and now they have this boring executive out on the speaking tour pumping up Google's display ad business.

    Agencies all know that Google is an enemy. At our agency, we were close partners with Google and then realized they are not interested in helping us, but rather taking our business away.

    Share
  5. WHAT A PUTZ…

    "And one small point, last year, we wrote $6 billion in checks to publisher partners"

    Rosenblatt, did the DISPLAY AD group write those checks or was it the Ad Sense/Words group.

    Don't talk about how BIG you are, that is not impressive, but stupid. Do you not remember what got Microsoft in trouble PUTZ!

    Share
  6. I am a fan of David's. He is so cute! I wouldn't mind being his Japanese toilet paper ;)

    Share
  7. Finally, someone with some balls to speak up regarding the importance of technology, ad networks and exchanges. Most agencies and the IAB are living in the dark ages.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post