<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TZero Falls Victim to the UWB Curse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/02/12/tzero-falls-victim-to-the-uwb-curse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/12/tzero-falls-victim-to-the-uwb-curse/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Covey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/12/tzero-falls-victim-to-the-uwb-curse/#comment-161069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou Covey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=39370#comment-161069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest problem with UWB companies is they still don&#039;t deliver what they promise.  They just keep raising money. I&#039;ve worked with three companies in the space, all had the same messages, all had the same demos at the trade shows, all had the same weaknesses, and they never fixed the problem.  The best thing that coul happen is someone to roll up the remaining companies into one or two players and focus the resources on solving the problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem with UWB companies is they still don&#8217;t deliver what they promise.  They just keep raising money. I&#8217;ve worked with three companies in the space, all had the same messages, all had the same demos at the trade shows, all had the same weaknesses, and they never fixed the problem.  The best thing that coul happen is someone to roll up the remaining companies into one or two players and focus the resources on solving the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/12/tzero-falls-victim-to-the-uwb-curse/#comment-161068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=39370#comment-161068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WirelessHD can do pretty much everything the current incarnation of UWB was supposed to do. The UWB standards people probably need to go back to petitioning the FCC to allow more flexibility in spectrum use and channel size. Then they could reposition UWB as a future physical layer (PHY) for WiFi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WirelessHD can do pretty much everything the current incarnation of UWB was supposed to do. The UWB standards people probably need to go back to petitioning the FCC to allow more flexibility in spectrum use and channel size. Then they could reposition UWB as a future physical layer (PHY) for WiFi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

