<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#039;s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook&#8217;s Twitter EndRun: Coopetition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook&#8217;s Twitter EndRun: Coopetition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the largest sources of updates on Twitter.&#8221; Plus, this move has been a long time coming after Facebook failed to purchase Twitter last year. Facebook rolled out a series of features that  mimicked several Twitter functionalities this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the largest sources of updates on Twitter.&#8221; Plus, this move has been a long time coming after Facebook failed to purchase Twitter last year. Facebook rolled out a series of features that  mimicked several Twitter functionalities this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOm - Who&#8217;s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter &#171; Collecta.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOm - Who&#8217;s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter &#171; Collecta.com Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GigaOm - Who&#8217;s Worried About Facebook? Not&#160;Twitter February 8, 2009   http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOm &#8211; Who&#8217;s Worried About Facebook? Not&nbsp;Twitter February 8, 2009   <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#187; Blog Archive &#187; With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This Week&#187; Blog Archive &#187; With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities &#124; The Click</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities &#124; The Click]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology News &#187; With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Technology News &#187; With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Moves Into Twitter Territory &#183; Kyle Jameson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Moves Into Twitter Territory &#183; Kyle Jameson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds Real Time Web Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds Real Time Web Capabilities]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as well as the removal of most distinctions between public pages and profiles. These changes are an attempt to take on Twitter, which Facebook failed to acquire late last year. Facebook has always been the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;All of this has happened before, and it will all happen again.&#8221; &#171; ginsudo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;All of this has happened before, and it will all happen again.&#8221; &#171; ginsudo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] already competitors, that Facebook will kill Twitter, or that they are at least competitors for developer mindshare.  They are certainly competitors for media mindshare - the lower half of this chart shows that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already competitors, that Facebook will kill Twitter, or that they are at least competitors for developer mindshare.  They are certainly competitors for media mindshare &#8211; the lower half of this chart shows that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Facebook Be Worried About Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should Facebook Be Worried About Twitter?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] challenge to Facebook. That doesn&#8217;t make sense, does it? Let me explain. Last week in what Om Malik accurately called &#8220;a severe case of hyperbole&#8221;, I stated that Facebook&#8217;s new status API would bring [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] challenge to Facebook. That doesn&#8217;t make sense, does it? Let me explain. Last week in what Om Malik accurately called &#8220;a severe case of hyperbole&#8221;, I stated that Facebook&#8217;s new status API would bring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Recap: Feb 7 &#38; 8 &#124; Microblink</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekend Recap: Feb 7 &#38; 8 &#124; Microblink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] lot of others from ever opening a Twitter account. For more information check out: TechCrunch, GigaOM and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lot of others from ever opening a Twitter account. For more information check out: TechCrunch, GigaOM and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook: apertura, strategia, privacy - Stalkk.ed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook: apertura, strategia, privacy - Stalkk.ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mentre da un lato i sostenitori della privacy si preoccupano, a mio parere giustamente, della vendita dei dati personali degli utenti di Facebook alle aziende per finalit&#224; di marketing, dall&#8217;altro il primo social network al mondo incomincia ad aprirsi: dapprima aderisce alla OpenID Foundation (sebbene un articolo di Ars Technica si chieda perch&#233;, vista la diametricalmente opposta soluzione rappresentata dall&#8217;OpenID rispetto al Facebook Connect), poi annuncia la disponibilit&#224; di nuove API, le quali consentono di rendere pubblico lo status dei propri utenti (in maniera simile a quella di Twitter), ma anche le note, i links ed i video, un insieme di dati che da ora in avanti sar&#224; altres&#236; accessibile dal di fuori del servizio di social networking da parte di altri siti web od applicazioni (Facebook ha inoltre rilasciato delle nuove API per facilitare le applicazioni esterne nella creazione di contenuti sulla sua piattaforma). Ci si domanda poi da pi&#249; parti se e come l&#8217;apertura degli statuses utente da parte di Facebook possa in qualche modo danneggiare Twitter, essendo una mossa pensata anche (e soprattutto?) per creare competizione al popolarissimo servizio di microblogging, ma sempre da pi&#249; parti si risponde che Twitter non ha in realt&#224; molto da temere da ci&#242;, considerate le evidenti diversit&#224; di utilizzo degli statuses dei due servizi (vedere in proposito gli articoli di TechCrunch e di GigaOM). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mentre da un lato i sostenitori della privacy si preoccupano, a mio parere giustamente, della vendita dei dati personali degli utenti di Facebook alle aziende per finalit&agrave; di marketing, dall&#8217;altro il primo social network al mondo incomincia ad aprirsi: dapprima aderisce alla OpenID Foundation (sebbene un articolo di Ars Technica si chieda perch&eacute;, vista la diametricalmente opposta soluzione rappresentata dall&#8217;OpenID rispetto al Facebook Connect), poi annuncia la disponibilit&agrave; di nuove API, le quali consentono di rendere pubblico lo status dei propri utenti (in maniera simile a quella di Twitter), ma anche le note, i links ed i video, un insieme di dati che da ora in avanti sar&agrave; altres&igrave; accessibile dal di fuori del servizio di social networking da parte di altri siti web od applicazioni (Facebook ha inoltre rilasciato delle nuove API per facilitare le applicazioni esterne nella creazione di contenuti sulla sua piattaforma). Ci si domanda poi da pi&ugrave; parti se e come l&#8217;apertura degli statuses utente da parte di Facebook possa in qualche modo danneggiare Twitter, essendo una mossa pensata anche (e soprattutto?) per creare competizione al popolarissimo servizio di microblogging, ma sempre da pi&ugrave; parti si risponde che Twitter non ha in realt&agrave; molto da temere da ci&ograve;, considerate le evidenti diversit&agrave; di utilizzo degli statuses dei due servizi (vedere in proposito gli articoli di TechCrunch e di GigaOM). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YUvamani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YUvamani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter and Facebook serve different needs. Facebook has fine(r) grained privacy controls which makes me more confident about putting say semi private/ slightly sensitive information. (Yeah yeah , I know the privacy of facebook is illusory, but it is better than complete public information)

Twitter is really a shout box to broadcast information, more like a blog. If I had an opinion about a movie, I would like the world to know ! even the @communication is info which is meant to be public. If I wanted to give my opinion on something I would like to put it in a place where it has an audience which by virtue of it being public is Twitter.

Which is why I use twitter to update facebook. Information I have in twitter can go to facebook. The other direction is not so kosher ...

In the end facebook and twitter have different kinds of information. Thus there is good reason for twitter not to be afraid .. StockTwits is better served by twitter and not facebook status updates (If my status contained information about stocks, I would be considered a dork)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter and Facebook serve different needs. Facebook has fine(r) grained privacy controls which makes me more confident about putting say semi private/ slightly sensitive information. (Yeah yeah , I know the privacy of facebook is illusory, but it is better than complete public information)</p>
<p>Twitter is really a shout box to broadcast information, more like a blog. If I had an opinion about a movie, I would like the world to know ! even the @communication is info which is meant to be public. If I wanted to give my opinion on something I would like to put it in a place where it has an audience which by virtue of it being public is Twitter.</p>
<p>Which is why I use twitter to update facebook. Information I have in twitter can go to facebook. The other direction is not so kosher &#8230;</p>
<p>In the end facebook and twitter have different kinds of information. Thus there is good reason for twitter not to be afraid .. StockTwits is better served by twitter and not facebook status updates (If my status contained information about stocks, I would be considered a dork)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LawontheStreet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LawontheStreet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Twitter app installed on your facebook account you can use both right from FB...it starts to get cumbersome when you have to follow lots of multiple browser screens at once...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Twitter app installed on your facebook account you can use both right from FB&#8230;it starts to get cumbersome when you have to follow lots of multiple browser screens at once&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skinnyeddy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skinnyeddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now someone just needs to develop an that would work with Open Social, Twitter, Android, iPhone and Facebook. they&#039;d make a killing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now someone just needs to develop an that would work with Open Social, Twitter, Android, iPhone and Facebook. they&#8217;d make a killing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Courtney</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Courtney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the best example of the different roles of Twitter and FB: one of the hottest apps for BlackBerry these days involves the beta trials of SocialScope (only on BlackBerry - socialscope.net) where a user can follow both Twitter and Facebook activity concurrently. It&#039;s getting lots of conversations over in Twitterville while they work through scalability and integration issues (for instance, Twitpic integration presents a challenge0&gt;

(And, having just attended a Toronto event about the BlackBerry Developer Community last week, attended by over 250 developers, RIM/BlackBerry is also seriously into that competition for developers referenced by Brendan.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the best example of the different roles of Twitter and FB: one of the hottest apps for BlackBerry these days involves the beta trials of SocialScope (only on BlackBerry &#8211; socialscope.net) where a user can follow both Twitter and Facebook activity concurrently. It&#8217;s getting lots of conversations over in Twitterville while they work through scalability and integration issues (for instance, Twitpic integration presents a challenge0&gt;</p>
<p>(And, having just attended a Toronto event about the BlackBerry Developer Community last week, attended by over 250 developers, RIM/BlackBerry is also seriously into that competition for developers referenced by Brendan.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmad Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/02/08/whos-worried-about-facebook-not-twitter/#comment-160327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmad Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=38409#comment-160327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] posted here: Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter   Add this to :   Digg it  Save to Del.icio.us  Subscribe to My RSS [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted here: Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter   Add this to :   Digg it  Save to Del.icio.us  Subscribe to My RSS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

