8 Comments

Summary:

Duke Energy’s Carolinas subsidy will renege on its proposed $50 million solar rooftop program unless North Carolina utility regulators remove restrictions on how it can pay for the project, the Charlotte Business Journal reports. The energy company, which gets 70 percent of its power from coal, […]

duke-energy-logo-medDuke Energy’s Carolinas subsidy will renege on its proposed $50 million solar rooftop program unless North Carolina utility regulators remove restrictions on how it can pay for the project, the Charlotte Business Journal reports.

The energy company, which gets 70 percent of its power from coal, had planned to recover costs for the project through rate hikes. But that scheme screeched to a halt earlier this month after the North Carolina Utilities Commission ruled that Duke could get 10 MW of solar power at lower cost from third-party providers than if it owns the photovoltaic systems itself. As a result, the regulators decided, it would be unreasonable for Duke to recoup the entire cost of the project through rate “riders.”

Now Duke is saying delayed cost recovery could force it to violate federal accounting rules governing the company’s use of energy-investment tax credits — including $125 million slated for an 825-MW coal plant, according to the Business Journal. In other words, it will have a hard time investing in coal power if it can’t gouge customers for solar.

All of this began last spring with a pledge from Duke to invest $100 million in solar rooftops, both commercial and residential, in North Carolina. The state had passed a new requirement for utilities to generate 12.5 percent of their energy from renewable sources by 2021, with standards phasing in next year. Duke Energy Carolinas said it would build and operate a 20-MW distributed solar power project to get started. It cut the plan to 10 MW and $50 million after public advocates protested utility ownership as anticompetitive.

The company wants out of not only the rooftop project, but also the requirement to start generating solar energy next year. The massive $173 million solar farm being built by SunEdison — the company that undercut Duke’s proposed rate hike — which the utility has contracted to supply 21.5 MW, won’t come online (with a minimum 16 MW) until the end of 2010.

  1. [...] and the city-owned Austin Energy. But the planned 30-megawatt project comes as some companies are scaling back their sun-powered operations and laying off staff, so how can San Francisco-based Gemini Solar keep [...]

    Share
  2. [...] Earth­2Tec­h­ « Economic situation forces Mitsubishi to cancel diesel Lancer rally program China [...]

    Share
  3. [...] last month, Charlotte, N.C.-based Duke Energy said it wanted out of a similar solar project, claiming that the local regulator was restricting ways in which it [...]

    Share
  4. [...] fact, Duke already lost one fight to go ahead with a $50 million solar project in North Carolina, backing out earlier this year with the complaint that local regulators wouldn’t let it fund the program the way it wanted [...]

    Share
  5. Earth to electric consumers! Earth to electric consumers! Any new power plant, whether from solar, coal, nukes or hamsters, is going to cost way more than the incumbent mess of 40-50 year old coal and nuke plants gasping along and being assessed only fuel and labor charges. And that cost will, or should, show up in the rate base.

    It is totally unrealistic for people to expect that electricity will be any cheaper in the future now that the reality of environmental and resource externalities is catching up with us. The days of building ANY power plants for $1-2/watt went out with fins on Cadillacs. And the knuckleheads who bray that solar is “too cheap to meter” because the sun is free is just as bad as the nuclear power knuckleheads.

    I’d rather see Duke make money from solar than coal. Or do you think you should buy a 2010 Prius for the same price as a 1970 Valiant?

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post