10 Comments

Summary:

A number of the major online video services have added an HD option for video uploads, but which one is the best? CNET’s Josh Lowensohn did a really great round-up of HD services and determined YouTube to be the best. Even better, Lowensohn created this handy-dandy […]

A number of the major online video services have added an HD option for video uploads, but which one is the best? CNET’s Josh Lowensohn did a really great round-up of HD services and determined YouTube to be the best. Even better, Lowensohn created this handy-dandy chart so you can compare them.

One thing CNET didn’t look at is upload and processing times, which probably is a good thing for YouTube because in my tests with them, I’ve run into major errors on those fronts. And there were a couple services CNET missed, like Motionbox (which the article cops to) and Viddyou. But overall, this is a good starting point, and Lowensohn’s accompanying post is worth a read.

hd_chart

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. YouTube times seem totally variable. But it’s kinda cool the SD version goes up while they’re still crunching away on higher quality (HQ) or HD. Still don’t like the automated copyright claim process, where I can’t interject and get a contact name, number, email to find out where I might infringe. Wondering if I’d be better insulated for that stuff by spending money on SmugMug – figure Facebook is in the same boat as YouTube in being beholden to big media, and who knows if the others will survive.

  2. Funny how we have got into the habit of refering to HD as High Defenition on the web.

  3. If you’re a YouTube Partner technically you can upload 20 gigabytes with no time limit, but it doesn’t currently appear in HD or even high quality.

  4. Chris Albrecht Friday, January 30, 2009

    @Dave, just in case you are wondering, yes, the Kelly Clarkson lip dubs you do are a copyright violation…

    My biggest issue was with the processing on YouTube. Vimeo does such a nice job of walking you through the process and telling you how much time you have left.

  5. I still cannot believe people pay so much for SmugMug for such a low end video offering that’s more of an afterthought than a product. Baffling.

    Viddyou’s free//Premium breakdown is here: http://www.viddyou.com/help.php#4

  6. Seems like some media and big blogs (like Engadget, TreCentral) are using Viddler. I probably don’t qualify for a revenue share, but I wonder if they’re more publisher friendly. May give them a try. I like the custom watermark/bug option, too.

    My lip dubs are so bad, they’d never make it online. Servers would melt. It’s a public service to keep them on my LAN only. :)

  7. I posted a better comparison of the HD video sites at http://techvideoblog.com/reviews/online-video-sites-hd-quality-comparison/

    My comparison talks about the actual bitrate, resolutions, video codecs, video encoding complexity level and audio codecs outputted. The cnet guy seems to know nothing about that while it is the most important factor.

    Also, Facebook encodes h264 with a higher complexity than Youtube and Facebook HD bitrate is slightly higher than Youtube at 2500kbit/s versus Youtube HD being at 2000kbit/s.

    1. Thanks Charbax.

  8. your pc on your tv Saturday, January 31, 2009

    I have a pretty good Comcast cable ISP and have found that HD videos/streams don’t work well. Give it a few more years.

    The www on your TV:
    PCTVCables.com

  9. Cold Hearted Flash For Valentines | Cold Hard Flash: Flash Animation News, Videos and Links Monday, February 2, 2009

    [...] recently voted YouTube’s HD service to be the best, so go to the site and watch this same HTF episode in [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post