<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter Shouldn&#039;t Sell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google May Buy Twitter. Or Not. But Why is Twitter So Hot?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-159007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google May Buy Twitter. Or Not. But Why is Twitter So Hot?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-159007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Twitter, essentially embodies those macro trends but hides them behind the elegant simplicity of 140 characters. Twitter, in fact is not a company, instead has become a verb and actually represents a certain way of doing things. That&#8217;s why I have maintained that Twitter shouldn&#8217;t really sell&#8230; at least not now! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, essentially embodies those macro trends but hides them behind the elegant simplicity of 140 characters. Twitter, in fact is not a company, instead has become a verb and actually represents a certain way of doing things. That&#8217;s why I have maintained that Twitter shouldn&#8217;t really sell&#8230; at least not now! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As It Turns Three, What Is Twitter To You?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-159006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[As It Turns Three, What Is Twitter To You?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-159006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] then the service, that is estimated to be valued at $250 million, received a $500 million dollar buyout offer from Facebook and when that failed, made Facebook change its game. It has inspired many books, blogs and a slew [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then the service, that is estimated to be valued at $250 million, received a $500 million dollar buyout offer from Facebook and when that failed, made Facebook change its game. It has inspired many books, blogs and a slew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#187; Blog Archive &#187; With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-159005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This Week&#187; Blog Archive &#187; With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-159005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] developers alike: In 2008, Twitter grew by 752 percent. Twitter has also fostered a somewhat more democratic ecosystem, one that has allowed apps on the platform to see huge growth in traffic. That has sparked a gold [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] developers alike: In 2008, Twitter grew by 752 percent. Twitter has also fostered a somewhat more democratic ecosystem, one that has allowed apps on the platform to see huge growth in traffic. That has sparked a gold [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities &#124; The Click</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-159004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities &#124; The Click]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-159004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] developers alike: In 2008, Twitter grew by 752 percent. Twitter has also fostered a somewhat more democratic ecosystem, one that has allowed apps on the platform to see huge growth in traffic. That has sparked a gold [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] developers alike: In 2008, Twitter grew by 752 percent. Twitter has also fostered a somewhat more democratic ecosystem, one that has allowed apps on the platform to see huge growth in traffic. That has sparked a gold [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology News &#187; With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-159003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Technology News &#187; With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds (Near) Real-time Web Capabilities]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-159003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] developers alike: In 2008, Twitter grew by 752 percent. Twitter has also fostered a somewhat more democratic ecosystem, one that has allowed apps on the platform to see huge growth in traffic. That has sparked a gold [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] developers alike: In 2008, Twitter grew by 752 percent. Twitter has also fostered a somewhat more democratic ecosystem, one that has allowed apps on the platform to see huge growth in traffic. That has sparked a gold [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds Real Time Web Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-159002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With Twitter Envy, Facebook Adds Real Time Web Capabilities]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-159002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] developers alike. In 2008 Twitter grew by 752%, furthermore Twitter has fostered a more somewhat democratic ecosystem that has allowed apps on the platform to see huge growth in traffic, sparking a gold rush for app [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] developers alike. In 2008 Twitter grew by 752%, furthermore Twitter has fostered a more somewhat democratic ecosystem that has allowed apps on the platform to see huge growth in traffic, sparking a gold rush for app [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don't try to Monetize Twitter &#124; Odd Ramblings from a Superfly Gaming 3.0 Start-Up</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-159001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don't try to Monetize Twitter &#124; Odd Ramblings from a Superfly Gaming 3.0 Start-Up]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-159001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] heard about Twitter, I thought, and in a sense still think, that Twitter is no more than a feature. Om Malik had an interesting take on it, as he contemplated whether or not it would be smart of Twitter to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] heard about Twitter, I thought, and in a sense still think, that Twitter is no more than a feature. Om Malik had an interesting take on it, as he contemplated whether or not it would be smart of Twitter to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter &#124; Social Networking Tribune</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-159000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter &#124; Social Networking Tribune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-159000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was the opening up of a Status API that got the most attention. Given that Twitter had rightfully rejected a $500 million offer from Facebook, it’s been perceived as a Twitter-killer. VentureBeat did a good job of explaining [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was the opening up of a Status API that got the most attention. Given that Twitter had rightfully rejected a $500 million offer from Facebook, it’s been perceived as a Twitter-killer. VentureBeat did a good job of explaining [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter &#124; Telecom Update</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-158999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter &#124; Telecom Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-158999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was the opening up of a Status API that got the most attention. Given that Twitter had rightfully rejected a $500 million offer from Facebook, it&#8217;s been perceived as a Twitter-killer. VentureBeat did a good job of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was the opening up of a Status API that got the most attention. Given that Twitter had rightfully rejected a $500 million offer from Facebook, it&#8217;s been perceived as a Twitter-killer. VentureBeat did a good job of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Xavia360 Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/26/why-twitter-shouldnt-sell/#comment-158998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Xavia360 Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who’s Worried About Facebook? Not Twitter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=36729#comment-158998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up of a Status API that got the most attention. Given that Twitter had rightfully rejected a $500 million offer from Facebook, it’s been perceived as a Twitter-killer. VentureBeat did a good job of explaining [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up of a Status API that got the most attention. Given that Twitter had rightfully rejected a $500 million offer from Facebook, it’s been perceived as a Twitter-killer. VentureBeat did a good job of explaining [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
