<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#039;s Broadband Snub Wasn&#039;t A Message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMT Blog &#187; Obama y las &#8220;telecos&#8221; (parte II): 4.500 millones para banda ancha</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/#comment-158840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CMT Blog &#187; Obama y las &#8220;telecos&#8221; (parte II): 4.500 millones para banda ancha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=36578#comment-158840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Gigaom, habría distintas modalidades de banda ancha para [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gigaom, habría distintas modalidades de banda ancha para [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama y las &#8220;telecos&#8221; (parte II): 4.500 millones para banda ancha &#124; CMT Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/#comment-158839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama y las &#8220;telecos&#8221; (parte II): 4.500 millones para banda ancha &#124; CMT Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=36578#comment-158839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Gigaom, habría distintas modalidades de banda ancha para [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gigaom, habría distintas modalidades de banda ancha para [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Updated Fate of Broadband in the Stimulus Bill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/#comment-158838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Updated Fate of Broadband in the Stimulus Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=36578#comment-158838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] talk over the current legislation is bringing up deeper debates that will likely come up again when Obama pulls together his plans for universal broadband. One issue pits wireless broadband against fiber for rural deployments. Another issue focuses on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talk over the current legislation is bringing up deeper debates that will likely come up again when Obama pulls together his plans for universal broadband. One issue pits wireless broadband against fiber for rural deployments. Another issue focuses on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Bandwidth Caps! : OverClocked Drama</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/#comment-158837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More Bandwidth Caps! : OverClocked Drama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=36578#comment-158837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] hope though, not only does the stimulus bill add more funding for broadband it clearly defines what it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hope though, not only does the stimulus bill add more funding for broadband it clearly defines what it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telcos to Congress: More Money Please</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/#comment-158836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Telcos to Congress: More Money Please]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=36578#comment-158836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stimulus bill that passed Wednesday in the House offers $6 billion in grants for providing broadband (much of that in rural areas), but required speeds of 5 Mbps down and 1 up. The companion bill [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stimulus bill that passed Wednesday in the House offers $6 billion in grants for providing broadband (much of that in rural areas), but required speeds of 5 Mbps down and 1 up. The companion bill [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama y las &#8220;telecos&#8221; (parte II): 4.500 millones para banda ancha &#171; Blog CMT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/#comment-158835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama y las &#8220;telecos&#8221; (parte II): 4.500 millones para banda ancha &#171; Blog CMT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=36578#comment-158835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Gigaom, habría distintas modalidades de banda ancha para [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gigaom, habría distintas modalidades de banda ancha para [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/#comment-158834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=36578#comment-158834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chester, thanks for the catch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chester, thanks for the catch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chesterjosiah</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/25/obamas-broadband-snub-wasnt-a-message/#comment-158833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chesterjosiah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=36578#comment-158833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stacey, you wrote:
&quot;Wireless broadband services must meet speeds of 3 Mbps up and 1 Mbps down to be classified as advanced, meaning both WiMAX and LTE will suffice.&quot;

Is it really 3 Mbps up and 1 Mbps down, not the other way (3 down 1 up)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey, you wrote:<br />
&#8220;Wireless broadband services must meet speeds of 3 Mbps up and 1 Mbps down to be classified as advanced, meaning both WiMAX and LTE will suffice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is it really 3 Mbps up and 1 Mbps down, not the other way (3 down 1 up)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

