<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Competition Starting to Eat Into Cisco&#8217;s Core Markets? &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Competition Starting to Eat Into Cisco&#8217;s Core Markets? &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] by low-cost manufacturers and increasingly desperate competitors. The very fact Cisco has made enemies of former partners such as IBM is only going to hurt the company.    : Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by low-cost manufacturers and increasingly desperate competitors. The very fact Cisco has made enemies of former partners such as IBM is only going to hurt the company.    : Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco’s Data Center Moves: Who Wins, Who Loses? &#171; Ads Sanrego</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco’s Data Center Moves: Who Wins, Who Loses? &#171; Ads Sanrego]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] With servers, now Cisco fights partners [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With servers, now Cisco fights partners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco’s Data Center Moves: Who Wins, Who Loses?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco’s Data Center Moves: Who Wins, Who Loses?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] With servers, now Cisco fights partners [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With servers, now Cisco fights partners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco Unified Computing System Changes The Dynamics of Datacenters &#124; CloudAve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco Unified Computing System Changes The Dynamics of Datacenters &#124; CloudAve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] articles by Zemanta With a New Server, Cisco Pushes &quot;Comm-puting&quot; Strategy (gigaom.com) With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners (gigaom.com) Cisco Plans Big Push Into Server Market (nytimes.com) Report: Cisco to elbow into [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] articles by Zemanta With a New Server, Cisco Pushes &#8220;Comm-puting&#8221; Strategy (gigaom.com) With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners (gigaom.com) Cisco Plans Big Push Into Server Market (nytimes.com) Report: Cisco to elbow into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With a New Server, Cisco Pushes &#8220;Comm-puting&#8221; Strategy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With a New Server, Cisco Pushes &#8220;Comm-puting&#8221; Strategy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a substantial investment in VMWare.The introduction of its servers — a move that is likely to put Cisco in conflict with partners such as IBM, HP and others — is part of an ongoing effort at Cisco to find new revenue opportunities that go beyond [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a substantial investment in VMWare.The introduction of its servers — a move that is likely to put Cisco in conflict with partners such as IBM, HP and others — is part of an ongoing effort at Cisco to find new revenue opportunities that go beyond [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Between the Lines mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Between the Lines mobile edition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cisco, this is one of the worst-kept secrets in the technology business. ZDNet, The New York Times, GigaOm, The Register, Bloomberg, Network World, and lots of other publications have recently written about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cisco, this is one of the worst-kept secrets in the technology business. ZDNet, The New York Times, GigaOm, The Register, Bloomberg, Network World, and lots of other publications have recently written about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Networks vs. Servers: The truce has ended, war is coming &#124; Tech Sanity Check &#124; TechRepublic.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Networks vs. Servers: The truce has ended, war is coming &#124; Tech Sanity Check &#124; TechRepublic.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cisco, this is one of the worst-kept secrets in the technology business. ZDNet, The New York Times, GigaOm, The Register, Bloomberg, Network World, and lots of other publications have recently written about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cisco, this is one of the worst-kept secrets in the technology business. ZDNet, The New York Times, GigaOm, The Register, Bloomberg, Network World, and lots of other publications have recently written about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Draper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Draper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Details about this have been bouncing around quite a bit lately.  Sounds like it&#039;ll be a blade-server in a Nexus chassis (so integrated networking), with some advanced/expanded memory management (via memory daughter card) and enhancements to QoS that will extended up the Application layer (as far as VMware can see).  Yes, it&#039;ll be a channel / partner conflict nightmare, but where else is Cisco going to find their next $1-5B/yr market.....surely you don&#039;t think it&#039;ll be in consumer, do you?

btw - CTO Warrior had nothing to do with this.  It was done by the Nuova team, which is back in charge of Cisco again (Mario, Prem, Luca, etc.).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Details about this have been bouncing around quite a bit lately.  Sounds like it&#8217;ll be a blade-server in a Nexus chassis (so integrated networking), with some advanced/expanded memory management (via memory daughter card) and enhancements to QoS that will extended up the Application layer (as far as VMware can see).  Yes, it&#8217;ll be a channel / partner conflict nightmare, but where else is Cisco going to find their next $1-5B/yr market&#8230;..surely you don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be in consumer, do you?</p>
<p>btw &#8211; CTO Warrior had nothing to do with this.  It was done by the Nuova team, which is back in charge of Cisco again (Mario, Prem, Luca, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco&#8217;s bold move to own the cloud computing infrastructure &#171; Yet Another VC Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco&#8217;s bold move to own the cloud computing infrastructure &#171; Yet Another VC Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaiyzen - The Art of Continual Improvement</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaiyzen - The Art of Continual Improvement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lost of noise today around Cisco entering the server market, some here and here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lost of noise today around Cisco entering the server market, some here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Whitney</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Whitney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most interesting aspect here is that there are ongoing technological advancements even with the eoonomy being less than stellar.  My main hope is that in the midst of this growth that digital security is held in the highest of importance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most interesting aspect here is that there are ongoing technological advancements even with the eoonomy being less than stellar.  My main hope is that in the midst of this growth that digital security is held in the highest of importance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Earnhardt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Earnhardt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om:

Our CTO, Padmasree Warrior, wrote a blog piece late yesterday on “unified computing” which states, in part: “Lately, there has been a lot of speculation by the technorati that “something is going on over at Cisco!” I am sure you have all read the blogs and reports in traditional media asserting that Cisco is going to enter new markets, compete for new business, and build new products. The answer? Yes, Yes and Yes, of course!”

See full blog post here: http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/introducing_unified_computing_to_the_data_center/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om:</p>
<p>Our CTO, Padmasree Warrior, wrote a blog piece late yesterday on “unified computing” which states, in part: “Lately, there has been a lot of speculation by the technorati that “something is going on over at Cisco!” I am sure you have all read the blogs and reports in traditional media asserting that Cisco is going to enter new markets, compete for new business, and build new products. The answer? Yes, Yes and Yes, of course!”</p>
<p>See full blog post here: <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/introducing_unified_computing_to_the_data_center/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/introducing_unified_computing_to_the_data_center/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cruft Of My Brain &#187; Cisco Servers? Seriously?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cruft Of My Brain &#187; Cisco Servers? Seriously?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I&#8217;m having a hard time with this being a smart move but I can see the reasoning.  Om posted about the latest rumors today and I think he hits on some important [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m having a hard time with this being a smart move but I can see the reasoning.  Om posted about the latest rumors today and I think he hits on some important [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hein Bloed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hein Bloed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder why nobody mentions the rumours regarding kvm in the new Cisco WAAS 4.1 appliance ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why nobody mentions the rumours regarding kvm in the new Cisco WAAS 4.1 appliance &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

