<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Competition Starting to Eat Into Cisco&#8217;s Core Markets? &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Competition Starting to Eat Into Cisco&#8217;s Core Markets? &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] by low-cost manufacturers and increasingly desperate competitors. The very fact Cisco has made enemies of former partners such as IBM is only going to hurt the company.    : Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by low-cost manufacturers and increasingly desperate competitors. The very fact Cisco has made enemies of former partners such as IBM is only going to hurt the company.    : Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco’s Data Center Moves: Who Wins, Who Loses? &#171; Ads Sanrego</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco’s Data Center Moves: Who Wins, Who Loses? &#171; Ads Sanrego]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] With servers, now Cisco fights partners [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With servers, now Cisco fights partners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco’s Data Center Moves: Who Wins, Who Loses?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco’s Data Center Moves: Who Wins, Who Loses?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] With servers, now Cisco fights partners [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With servers, now Cisco fights partners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco Unified Computing System Changes The Dynamics of Datacenters &#124; CloudAve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco Unified Computing System Changes The Dynamics of Datacenters &#124; CloudAve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] articles by Zemanta With a New Server, Cisco Pushes &quot;Comm-puting&quot; Strategy (gigaom.com) With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners (gigaom.com) Cisco Plans Big Push Into Server Market (nytimes.com) Report: Cisco to elbow into [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] articles by Zemanta With a New Server, Cisco Pushes &#8220;Comm-puting&#8221; Strategy (gigaom.com) With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners (gigaom.com) Cisco Plans Big Push Into Server Market (nytimes.com) Report: Cisco to elbow into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With a New Server, Cisco Pushes &#8220;Comm-puting&#8221; Strategy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With a New Server, Cisco Pushes &#8220;Comm-puting&#8221; Strategy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a substantial investment in VMWare.The introduction of its servers — a move that is likely to put Cisco in conflict with partners such as IBM, HP and others — is part of an ongoing effort at Cisco to find new revenue opportunities that go beyond [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a substantial investment in VMWare.The introduction of its servers — a move that is likely to put Cisco in conflict with partners such as IBM, HP and others — is part of an ongoing effort at Cisco to find new revenue opportunities that go beyond [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Between the Lines mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Between the Lines mobile edition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cisco, this is one of the worst-kept secrets in the technology business. ZDNet, The New York Times, GigaOm, The Register, Bloomberg, Network World, and lots of other publications have recently written about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cisco, this is one of the worst-kept secrets in the technology business. ZDNet, The New York Times, GigaOm, The Register, Bloomberg, Network World, and lots of other publications have recently written about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Networks vs. Servers: The truce has ended, war is coming &#124; Tech Sanity Check &#124; TechRepublic.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Networks vs. Servers: The truce has ended, war is coming &#124; Tech Sanity Check &#124; TechRepublic.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cisco, this is one of the worst-kept secrets in the technology business. ZDNet, The New York Times, GigaOm, The Register, Bloomberg, Network World, and lots of other publications have recently written about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cisco, this is one of the worst-kept secrets in the technology business. ZDNet, The New York Times, GigaOm, The Register, Bloomberg, Network World, and lots of other publications have recently written about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Draper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Draper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Details about this have been bouncing around quite a bit lately.  Sounds like it&#039;ll be a blade-server in a Nexus chassis (so integrated networking), with some advanced/expanded memory management (via memory daughter card) and enhancements to QoS that will extended up the Application layer (as far as VMware can see).  Yes, it&#039;ll be a channel / partner conflict nightmare, but where else is Cisco going to find their next $1-5B/yr market.....surely you don&#039;t think it&#039;ll be in consumer, do you?

btw - CTO Warrior had nothing to do with this.  It was done by the Nuova team, which is back in charge of Cisco again (Mario, Prem, Luca, etc.).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Details about this have been bouncing around quite a bit lately.  Sounds like it&#8217;ll be a blade-server in a Nexus chassis (so integrated networking), with some advanced/expanded memory management (via memory daughter card) and enhancements to QoS that will extended up the Application layer (as far as VMware can see).  Yes, it&#8217;ll be a channel / partner conflict nightmare, but where else is Cisco going to find their next $1-5B/yr market&#8230;..surely you don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be in consumer, do you?</p>
<p>btw &#8211; CTO Warrior had nothing to do with this.  It was done by the Nuova team, which is back in charge of Cisco again (Mario, Prem, Luca, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco&#8217;s bold move to own the cloud computing infrastructure &#171; Yet Another VC Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco&#8217;s bold move to own the cloud computing infrastructure &#171; Yet Another VC Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With Servers, Now Cisco Fights Partners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaiyzen - The Art of Continual Improvement</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/20/with-servers-now-cisco-fights-partners/#comment-158350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaiyzen - The Art of Continual Improvement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35911#comment-158350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lost of noise today around Cisco entering the server market, some here and here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lost of noise today around Cisco entering the server market, some here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
