<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Asks if Comcast Slows Rivals&#039; VoIP Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-208775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-208775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;OK..I DID THIS OBJECTIVE TEST.
I HAVE A COMCAST connection.
Speed test:
http://www.speedtest.net/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;11 mpbs  D and 3 mbps U .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IN-SPITE of this I keep getting fading and totally crappy voice from Skype - like waxing and waning effect hearing opp side. Opp side also can hear only my broken bits and pieces.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then I switched immediately  to DSL from SBC ( neighbor&#039;s ) :
 3 mpbs  D and 0.78 mbps U .
and I can hear skype CLEARLY.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;SO yes it is a comcast thing ..it looks like. But I had the same provider at the place 40 miles away and never had this problem. THIS STARTED FOR ME LIKE SINCE I MOVED TO THIS NEW PLACE !!!!
I deleted the shared.xml file everytime  ( that has the methods skype uses to contact other service providers ) to see if it helped. I doubt it did .
I dont know what&#039;d be the problem. HOW does comast ID a Skype Packet.
I had disconnection problems over a COMCAST connection for justvoip too but less bad as skype. Skype was the worst.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK..I DID THIS OBJECTIVE TEST.<br />
I HAVE A COMCAST connection.<br />
Speed test:<br />
<a href="http://www.speedtest.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.speedtest.net/</a></p>
<p>11 mpbs  D and 3 mbps U .</p>
<p>IN-SPITE of this I keep getting fading and totally crappy voice from Skype &#8211; like waxing and waning effect hearing opp side. Opp side also can hear only my broken bits and pieces.</p>
<p>Then I switched immediately  to DSL from SBC ( neighbor&#8217;s ) :<br />
 3 mpbs  D and 0.78 mbps U .<br />
and I can hear skype CLEARLY.</p>
<p>SO yes it is a comcast thing ..it looks like. But I had the same provider at the place 40 miles away and never had this problem. THIS STARTED FOR ME LIKE SINCE I MOVED TO THIS NEW PLACE !!!!<br />
I deleted the shared.xml file everytime  ( that has the methods skype uses to contact other service providers ) to see if it helped. I doubt it did .<br />
I dont know what&#8217;d be the problem. HOW does comast ID a Skype Packet.<br />
I had disconnection problems over a COMCAST connection for justvoip too but less bad as skype. Skype was the worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patricia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I am a comcast user, and I am complaining.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve had the same drop outs using skype.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On 2 different types of operating systems. One Ubuntu running skype for Ubuntu, and running skype on windows 7. Both drop out on wired connection, and wireless.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This has been an ongoing problem for over a year, and comcast refuses to address the issue or flat out denies any issues. Typical.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a comcast user, and I am complaining.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had the same drop outs using skype.</p>
<p>On 2 different types of operating systems. One Ubuntu running skype for Ubuntu, and running skype on windows 7. Both drop out on wired connection, and wireless.</p>
<p>This has been an ongoing problem for over a year, and comcast refuses to address the issue or flat out denies any issues. Typical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james bil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james bil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;VoIP traffic tends to be unencrypted, but that doesn&#039;t mean that it has to be. For example, large corporations often use IPsec-encrypted VPN tunnels for VoIP traffic. Doing so hasn&#039;t proven to be a perfect solution, though.
&lt;a href=&quot;www.thevoipjournal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Voice over Internet Protocol&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VoIP traffic tends to be unencrypted, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that it has to be. For example, large corporations often use IPsec-encrypted VPN tunnels for VoIP traffic. Doing so hasn&#8217;t proven to be a perfect solution, though.<br />
<a href="www.thevoipjournal.com" rel="nofollow">Voice over Internet Protocol</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Vonage over Comcast in Rockville Maryland is terrible. The upload speeds slow to zero so the call recipient cannot hear you but you can hear them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A temporary solution is to reboot the cable modem which gets a fresh connection and things are fast again for a few minutes before Comcast hammers Vonage again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do not trust Comcast.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vonage over Comcast in Rockville Maryland is terrible. The upload speeds slow to zero so the call recipient cannot hear you but you can hear them.</p>
<p>A temporary solution is to reboot the cable modem which gets a fresh connection and things are fast again for a few minutes before Comcast hammers Vonage again.</p>
<p>I do not trust Comcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comcast vs. AT&#38;T U-verse &#187; Tech Reviews</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comcast vs. AT&#38;T U-verse &#187; Tech Reviews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recently investigated by the FCC for throttling BitTorrent data transmissions on their network, and plans to slow data transmissions from rival VoIP providers. Comcast has also started applying bandwidth caps of up to 250GB/month in certain markets. AT&amp;T [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently investigated by the FCC for throttling BitTorrent data transmissions on their network, and plans to slow data transmissions from rival VoIP providers. Comcast has also started applying bandwidth caps of up to 250GB/month in certain markets. AT&amp;T [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time Warner Cable Adds Tier-Friendly Terms to its Contracts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable Adds Tier-Friendly Terms to its Contracts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] providers and online video. That may draw the FCC&#8217;s ire. The agency earlier this year was asking Comcast whether it prioritizes its own VoIP services over competitors&#8217; also running on the cable network. We can&#8217;t get a new FCC chief soon [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] providers and online video. That may draw the FCC&#8217;s ire. The agency earlier this year was asking Comcast whether it prioritizes its own VoIP services over competitors&#8217; also running on the cable network. We can&#8217;t get a new FCC chief soon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjornski</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bjornski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve just been slammed hard by Comcast and their &quot;traffic management&quot;.

If I even load up any torrents, even with minimal settings (10 connections max, 1 file at a tme, 100k down, 10k up), if I connect to ONE peer, my web browsing speeds drop to zero (or nearly) for 15 minutes.

That&#039;s bad enough.

I also have a MagicJack telephone device.  I&#039;ve now found that when I make/get calls with it, it seems to &quot;clog&quot; those same network management nodes, and &quot;bam!&quot;  - Internet speeds are cut to zero for 15 minutes.

FOR USING A COMPETITORS PHONE SYSTEM!

Protocol-agnostic, my butt.

And last night, when my speeds finally came back?  I started looking for competitors in the area (Minneapolis = no competition).  And know what I was running into?

Network speeds being determined by WHAT I WAS SEARCHING FOR!  I could do my daily reading, (politics comedy) just fine, but toss in &quot;ViOP&quot; or &quot;torrent&quot; into the Google search, and BAM!  Slow-speeds again.

I hate Comcast with the energy of 1000 burning suns.  Our state governor should be HUNG for allowing this monopoly to stay in place.

But he likes their donation checks (and his quest to run for President in 2012) more than he likes the citizens.

BOYCOTT COMCAST!  Get DSL and Dish network instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just been slammed hard by Comcast and their &#8220;traffic management&#8221;.</p>
<p>If I even load up any torrents, even with minimal settings (10 connections max, 1 file at a tme, 100k down, 10k up), if I connect to ONE peer, my web browsing speeds drop to zero (or nearly) for 15 minutes.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s bad enough.</p>
<p>I also have a MagicJack telephone device.  I&#8217;ve now found that when I make/get calls with it, it seems to &#8220;clog&#8221; those same network management nodes, and &#8220;bam!&#8221;  &#8211; Internet speeds are cut to zero for 15 minutes.</p>
<p>FOR USING A COMPETITORS PHONE SYSTEM!</p>
<p>Protocol-agnostic, my butt.</p>
<p>And last night, when my speeds finally came back?  I started looking for competitors in the area (Minneapolis = no competition).  And know what I was running into?</p>
<p>Network speeds being determined by WHAT I WAS SEARCHING FOR!  I could do my daily reading, (politics comedy) just fine, but toss in &#8220;ViOP&#8221; or &#8220;torrent&#8221; into the Google search, and BAM!  Slow-speeds again.</p>
<p>I hate Comcast with the energy of 1000 burning suns.  Our state governor should be HUNG for allowing this monopoly to stay in place.</p>
<p>But he likes their donation checks (and his quest to run for President in 2012) more than he likes the citizens.</p>
<p>BOYCOTT COMCAST!  Get DSL and Dish network instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would bet everything I&#039;ve got that Comcast is screwing with customers who choose a different VoIP service than theirs.  I have been with them (not happy about it, but they bought out RoadRunner in Lake City so I had no choice in the matter) for around 4 years or so.  Their speed and service is sub-par at best.

What really clued me in is how bad my internet service declined the day I hooked up Vonage.  Now almost every site I try to visit is SUPER-SLOW to connect or it times out both in IE and FF browsers.  It matters not if it&#039;s online banking or just visiting a site - it drags and drags and then gives an error page about the slow connection, etc.

I must say that the Vonage service is amazing - I quit AT&amp;T and the call clarity and quality is excellent, so it&#039;s the internet connection that I&#039;m upset about... so much so that if I cannot resolve it, I&#039;ll have to go back to regular telephone and I don&#039;t want to.

I agree with several of you and I think that they are pulling some sleazy tricks and hope that the FCC gets all over them (the FTC too, for that matter - there should be freedom of choice!).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would bet everything I&#8217;ve got that Comcast is screwing with customers who choose a different VoIP service than theirs.  I have been with them (not happy about it, but they bought out RoadRunner in Lake City so I had no choice in the matter) for around 4 years or so.  Their speed and service is sub-par at best.</p>
<p>What really clued me in is how bad my internet service declined the day I hooked up Vonage.  Now almost every site I try to visit is SUPER-SLOW to connect or it times out both in IE and FF browsers.  It matters not if it&#8217;s online banking or just visiting a site &#8211; it drags and drags and then gives an error page about the slow connection, etc.</p>
<p>I must say that the Vonage service is amazing &#8211; I quit AT&amp;T and the call clarity and quality is excellent, so it&#8217;s the internet connection that I&#8217;m upset about&#8230; so much so that if I cannot resolve it, I&#8217;ll have to go back to regular telephone and I don&#8217;t want to.</p>
<p>I agree with several of you and I think that they are pulling some sleazy tricks and hope that the FCC gets all over them (the FTC too, for that matter &#8211; there should be freedom of choice!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in Washington DC and am getting 20 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up, but 20-28% QoS using various VOIP tests.  I&#039;ve got a service call in a couple of days.  I&#039;ll post if there&#039;s anything interesting that comes up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in Washington DC and am getting 20 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up, but 20-28% QoS using various VOIP tests.  I&#8217;ve got a service call in a couple of days.  I&#8217;ll post if there&#8217;s anything interesting that comes up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techietype</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/19/fcc-asks-if-comcast-slows-rivals-voip-traffic/#comment-158337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Techietype]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35902#comment-158337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I definately think that Comcast is downgrading the QOS on third-party VoIP packets! I have their standard residential high speed internet, and my service speed is a whopping 11-11.5 Mbps down and 4.5 Mbps upstream - which is very fast compared to the cable internet benchmark. What I noticed, when conducting various VoIP-specific tests, is that even with low jitter levels and a fast up/downastream is that the QoS measurement of my VoIP packets is less than 32% on average. That&#039;s why I have such terrible sound quality problems when I try to use a third party voip service from my home. I have CDV (Comcast Digital Voice), with two lines, and never have any issues with them. It&#039;s all just a bit too suspicious... And I noticed that over the past 2 months or so, it seems as though the QoS on my VoIP packets has been getting progressively worse! I used to be able to use third party voip at home about 6 months ago with no problems, but lately something has been up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definately think that Comcast is downgrading the QOS on third-party VoIP packets! I have their standard residential high speed internet, and my service speed is a whopping 11-11.5 Mbps down and 4.5 Mbps upstream &#8211; which is very fast compared to the cable internet benchmark. What I noticed, when conducting various VoIP-specific tests, is that even with low jitter levels and a fast up/downastream is that the QoS measurement of my VoIP packets is less than 32% on average. That&#8217;s why I have such terrible sound quality problems when I try to use a third party voip service from my home. I have CDV (Comcast Digital Voice), with two lines, and never have any issues with them. It&#8217;s all just a bit too suspicious&#8230; And I noticed that over the past 2 months or so, it seems as though the QoS on my VoIP packets has been getting progressively worse! I used to be able to use third party voip at home about 6 months ago with no problems, but lately something has been up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
