<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joyent Buys Reasonably Smart to Create Open-source Cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Much Money Did Joyent Really Raise?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-984947</link>
		<dc:creator>How Much Money Did Joyent Really Raise?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-984947</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Joyent, the six year old Sausalito, Calif.-based start-up that started out as a web hosting company but eventually evolved into a cloud service provide. Neither Intel, nor Joyent disclosed the amount of money invested, but [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joyent, the six year old Sausalito, Calif.-based start-up that started out as a web hosting company but eventually evolved into a cloud service provide. Neither Intel, nor Joyent disclosed the amount of money invested, but [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consuming compute and storage services &#124; Digital Asset Management</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-930461</link>
		<dc:creator>Consuming compute and storage services &#124; Digital Asset Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-930461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Joyent Buys Reasonably Smart to Create Open-source Cloud (gigaom.com) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joyent Buys Reasonably Smart to Create Open-source Cloud (gigaom.com) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Links 15/01/2009: GNU/Linux Tops Windows, OS X</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921961</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Links 15/01/2009: GNU/Linux Tops Windows, OS X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921961</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Joyent Buys Reasonably Smart to Create Open-source Cloud Joyent today announced it has agreed to acquire Reasonably Smart, a fledgling cloud startup based on JavaScript and Git, for an undisclosed amount. While on the surface it might look like simple industry consolidation, Reasonably Smart’s technology will in fact help Joyent compete with emerging service-centric clouds while retaining an open model that makes developers comfortable. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joyent Buys Reasonably Smart to Create Open-source Cloud Joyent today announced it has agreed to acquire Reasonably Smart, a fledgling cloud startup based on JavaScript and Git, for an undisclosed amount. While on the surface it might look like simple industry consolidation, Reasonably Smart’s technology will in fact help Joyent compete with emerging service-centric clouds while retaining an open model that makes developers comfortable. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geir Magnusson Jr</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921860</link>
		<dc:creator>Geir Magnusson Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921860</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Alistair :&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ok - it&#039;s just that the way the articled flowed :&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;....  Users aren&#039;t locked in.  ....  &quot;
 &quot; ...  By contrast, ... 10gen ...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;positioned 10gen as a system where users were locked in to a provider, like with Azure and Google.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just wanted to make it clear that anyone can take the open source 10gen stack and run it where they choose, even on Joyent :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;geir&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alistair :</p>

<p>Ok &#8211; it&#8217;s just that the way the articled flowed :</p>

<p>&#8220;&#8230;.  Users aren&#8217;t locked in.  &#8230;.  &#8221;
 &#8221; &#8230;  By contrast, &#8230; 10gen &#8230;&#8221;</p>

<p>positioned 10gen as a system where users were locked in to a provider, like with Azure and Google.</p>

<p>I just wanted to make it clear that anyone can take the open source 10gen stack and run it where they choose, even on Joyent :)</p>

<p>geir</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyent Buys Reasonably Smart, Focusing on the Open Source Cloud &#124; google android os blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921830</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyent Buys Reasonably Smart, Focusing on the Open Source Cloud &#124; google android os blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921830</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Smart, a fledgling open cloud startup based on JavaScript and Git, for an undisclosed amount, reports GigaOm. &quot;While on the surface it might look like simple industry consolidation, Reasonably Smart’s [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smart, a fledgling open cloud startup based on JavaScript and Git, for an undisclosed amount, reports GigaOm. &quot;While on the surface it might look like simple industry consolidation, Reasonably Smart’s [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Croll</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921717</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Croll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921717</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Geir: 10Gen&#039;s model of open source platforms (Mongo) that scale without caring about infrastructure is directly parallel to Reasonably Smart&#039;s model (JavaScript + Git + other I/O, now open source). That was my point -- Joyent needed a scalable development environment that people could run on their own if they chose.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@anon: The Reasonably Smart platform runs on your desktop if you want it to, with I/O extensions that you can use and tweak.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Andy: Things like Hypertable (Bigtable-like) and CouchDB (SimpleDB-like) aim to reduce the lock-in but aren&#039;t plug-compatible with Google or Amazon today. As for the JavaScript thing, yeah, I thought that too. James A. Duncan, ReasonablySmart&#039;s CTO, tells a good story around that though. I suspect that for simple data-driven front-ends, it&#039;s relatively easy. Who knows, maybe all those client-side coders will use it...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hopefully there will be some standardization on a minimum feature set soon. But the cloud operators know that if they make it completely transparent to move your app from one cloud to another, they&#039;ll commoditize themselves. So they need to put in value-added services to keep you there. Which means that while you might one day be able to move your Google App Engine app from Bigtable to your own Hypertable, you&#039;re unlikely to be able to disconnect from Google Checkout, or Search, or mapping.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s those services that will be lock-in in the long term, just as it was things like font managers, printer drivers, and RTF editors on Windows that kept developers using it. It&#039;s just too much of a pain to go rebuild it from scratch.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Geir: 10Gen&#8217;s model of open source platforms (Mongo) that scale without caring about infrastructure is directly parallel to Reasonably Smart&#8217;s model (JavaScript + Git + other I/O, now open source). That was my point &#8212; Joyent needed a scalable development environment that people could run on their own if they chose.</p>

<p>@anon: The Reasonably Smart platform runs on your desktop if you want it to, with I/O extensions that you can use and tweak.</p>

<p>@Andy: Things like Hypertable (Bigtable-like) and CouchDB (SimpleDB-like) aim to reduce the lock-in but aren&#8217;t plug-compatible with Google or Amazon today. As for the JavaScript thing, yeah, I thought that too. James A. Duncan, ReasonablySmart&#8217;s CTO, tells a good story around that though. I suspect that for simple data-driven front-ends, it&#8217;s relatively easy. Who knows, maybe all those client-side coders will use it&#8230;</p>

<p>Hopefully there will be some standardization on a minimum feature set soon. But the cloud operators know that if they make it completely transparent to move your app from one cloud to another, they&#8217;ll commoditize themselves. So they need to put in value-added services to keep you there. Which means that while you might one day be able to move your Google App Engine app from Bigtable to your own Hypertable, you&#8217;re unlikely to be able to disconnect from Google Checkout, or Search, or mapping.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s those services that will be lock-in in the long term, just as it was things like font managers, printer drivers, and RTF editors on Windows that kept developers using it. It&#8217;s just too much of a pain to go rebuild it from scratch.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geir Magnusson Jr</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921703</link>
		<dc:creator>Geir Magnusson Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921703</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;All of 10gen&#039;s software is open source as well, so you can take it run on your own equipment, on AWS, at Rackspace, wherever you wish.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure how our model is seen as any different than that of Joyent/RS.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;geir
VP, Engineering
10gen&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of 10gen&#8217;s software is open source as well, so you can take it run on your own equipment, on AWS, at Rackspace, wherever you wish.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not sure how our model is seen as any different than that of Joyent/RS.</p>

<p>geir
VP, Engineering
10gen</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921696</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The concept of Reasonably Smart sounds good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But why on earth did you have to pick javascript?? The reality is, NO ONE write server apps in javascript. By choosing js, you immediately cut your potential user base by 99.99%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, how is this any less lock-in than Google App Engine? GAE uses its own proprietary data store.  Reasonably Smart also uses its own proprietary data store.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At least GAE uses Python, which makes infinitely more sense than javascript for server programming.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of Reasonably Smart sounds good.</p>

<p>But why on earth did you have to pick javascript?? The reality is, NO ONE write server apps in javascript. By choosing js, you immediately cut your potential user base by 99.99%.</p>

<p>Also, how is this any less lock-in than Google App Engine? GAE uses its own proprietary data store.  Reasonably Smart also uses its own proprietary data store.</p>

<p>At least GAE uses Python, which makes infinitely more sense than javascript for server programming.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921693</link>
		<dc:creator>gp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921693</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;write code in javascript ........OMG!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>write code in javascript &#8230;&#8230;..OMG!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921688</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921688</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey painstaking research, there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rajesh&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey painstaking research, there.</p>

<p>Rajesh</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Boothby</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921676</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Boothby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921676</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The source code for Reasonably Smart is open source.   Joyent will be running a Reasonably Smart Platform service, but if you don&#039;t like ours, you can down load the code and run your own version of the Reasonably Smart Platform, just like you can run your own instance of MySQL, Apache, Nginx, TomCat, Thin, or Mongrel.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The source code for Reasonably Smart is open source.   Joyent will be running a Reasonably Smart Platform service, but if you don&#8217;t like ours, you can down load the code and run your own version of the Reasonably Smart Platform, just like you can run your own instance of MySQL, Apache, Nginx, TomCat, Thin, or Mongrel.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/joyent-to-buy-reasonably-smart-creating-scalable-open-source-cloud/#comment-921670</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35365#comment-921670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I dont understand how Reasonably Smart is open and not a vendor lock in. Since you have to write server side code in Javascript with their proprietary libraries for database etc, you would end up locked in to Reasonably Smart. There is no other open source platform that allows to write code in Javascript (except appjet).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand how Reasonably Smart is open and not a vendor lock in. Since you have to write server side code in Javascript with their proprietary libraries for database etc, you would end up locked in to Reasonably Smart. There is no other open source platform that allows to write code in Javascript (except appjet).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
