<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Reasons Why Carol Bartz Is Right for Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pinoy Tutorial</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-984925</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinoy Tutorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-984925</guid>
		<description>*proves to the world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*proves to the world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinoy Tutorial</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-984924</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinoy Tutorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-984924</guid>
		<description>Well a year from now this had changed.. carol bartz just proves to the wrold how she is letting Yahoo slide on its tomb

don&#039;t believe us? See this proof http://bit.ly/carol-bartz-is-a-loser

sad but its the truth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well a year from now this had changed.. carol bartz just proves to the wrold how she is letting Yahoo slide on its tomb</p>
<p>don&#8217;t believe us? See this proof <a href="http://bit.ly/carol-bartz-is-a-loser" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/carol-bartz-is-a-loser</a></p>
<p>sad but its the truth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinoy Tutorial</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-981190</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinoy Tutorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-981190</guid>
		<description>Carol who? oh you mean carol bartz, the woman who said &quot;she will kick some butt&quot; to raise yahoo from the ashes but obviously failed?

or the other carol bartz who bitterly said, &quot;Yahoo was never a search engine&quot; when she knew in her heart that Google see right through the company.

Or the far-version of Carol bartz, the one Mr. Icahn called a &quot;loser&quot;?

I guess those 3 carol bartz looks the same to me

detail sources: http://pinoytutorial.com/techtorial/is-carol-bartz-a-yahoo-%E2%80%9Closer%E2%80%9D-ceo/

Not to sound to be mean, but facts are facts. Sometimes things are hard to swallow but in the end it can do you more good than harm. Just like that Bitter Pill you use to take when you were a child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol who? oh you mean carol bartz, the woman who said &#8220;she will kick some butt&#8221; to raise yahoo from the ashes but obviously failed?</p>
<p>or the other carol bartz who bitterly said, &#8220;Yahoo was never a search engine&#8221; when she knew in her heart that Google see right through the company.</p>
<p>Or the far-version of Carol bartz, the one Mr. Icahn called a &#8220;loser&#8221;?</p>
<p>I guess those 3 carol bartz looks the same to me</p>
<p>detail sources: <a href="http://pinoytutorial.com/techtorial/is-carol-bartz-a-yahoo-%E2%80%9Closer%E2%80%9D-ceo/" rel="nofollow">http://pinoytutorial.com/techtorial/is-carol-bartz-a-yahoo-%E2%80%9Closer%E2%80%9D-ceo/</a></p>
<p>Not to sound to be mean, but facts are facts. Sometimes things are hard to swallow but in the end it can do you more good than harm. Just like that Bitter Pill you use to take when you were a child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo CEO Bartz: &#8220;We Are Not a Search Company&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-947381</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo CEO Bartz: &#8220;We Are Not a Search Company&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 02:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-947381</guid>
		<description>[...] is not search company. That&#8217;s the word from freshly installed Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz (whom Om has liked from the beginning), in an interview with CNBC&#8217;s Jim Goldman that will air in chunks tomorrow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is not search company. That&#8217;s the word from freshly installed Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz (whom Om has liked from the beginning), in an interview with CNBC&#8217;s Jim Goldman that will air in chunks tomorrow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the F-Bomb a Key Corporate Message (a mini-case study from Carol Bartz at Yahoo) &#124; Seat at the Table</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-939403</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the F-Bomb a Key Corporate Message (a mini-case study from Carol Bartz at Yahoo) &#124; Seat at the Table</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-939403</guid>
		<description>[...] Her honest approach to communications (talking the way she talks, not the way someone trained her to talk) seems to simply reflect her approach to business – no one doubts her sincerity and seriousness because she’s honest to a f***ing fault about getting things done.&#160; Here’s a good outline of her style at GigaOm. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Her honest approach to communications (talking the way she talks, not the way someone trained her to talk) seems to simply reflect her approach to business – no one doubts her sincerity and seriousness because she’s honest to a f***ing fault about getting things done.&#160; Here’s a good outline of her style at GigaOm. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Smith Jr. Lives Here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bartz is not what the good Yahoo doctor prescribed!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-924703</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Smith Jr. Lives Here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bartz is not what the good Yahoo doctor prescribed!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-924703</guid>
		<description>[...] they should do, the people to do it and convey that message to the masses? TechCrunch is unsure but GigaOm thinks it will work out. I think if the plan is to chop things up, sell them and move on then Carol [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they should do, the people to do it and convey that message to the masses? TechCrunch is unsure but GigaOm thinks it will work out. I think if the plan is to chop things up, sell them and move on then Carol [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe Yahoo Was Destined to Flounder &#124; The Click</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-923207</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe Yahoo Was Destined to Flounder &#124; The Click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-923207</guid>
		<description>[...] which I doubt will be very much fun. Still, it will be the first time recently appointed CEO Carol Bartz will have a chance to publicly address the most significant question facing the company: When is it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which I doubt will be very much fun. Still, it will be the first time recently appointed CEO Carol Bartz will have a chance to publicly address the most significant question facing the company: When is it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe Yahoo Was Destined to Flounder</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-923012</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe Yahoo Was Destined to Flounder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-923012</guid>
		<description>[...] which I doubt will be very much fun. Still, it will be the first time recently appointed CEO Carol Bartz will have a chance to publicly address the most significant question facing the company: When is it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which I doubt will be very much fun. Still, it will be the first time recently appointed CEO Carol Bartz will have a chance to publicly address the most significant question facing the company: When is it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Fateful Month for Big Tech Companies</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-922328</link>
		<dc:creator>A Fateful Month for Big Tech Companies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-922328</guid>
		<description>[...] as the worst in Yahoo&#8217;s history. The earnings call will focus on new CEO Carol Bartz. Can she replicate her success at Autodesk? Will she forge the right partnerships and make the right deals? Can she make Yahoo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as the worst in Yahoo&#8217;s history. The earnings call will focus on new CEO Carol Bartz. Can she replicate her success at Autodesk? Will she forge the right partnerships and make the right deals? Can she make Yahoo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-921946</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-921946</guid>
		<description>[...]  7 Reasons Why Carol Bartz Is Right for Yahoo Yahoo (s YHOO) says today that Autodesk&#8217;s (s ADSK) former Executive Chairman Carol Bartz is taking over as the [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  7 Reasons Why Carol Bartz Is Right for Yahoo Yahoo (s YHOO) says today that Autodesk&#8217;s (s ADSK) former Executive Chairman Carol Bartz is taking over as the [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mi otro blog&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo! ya tiene nueva CEO</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-921856</link>
		<dc:creator>Mi otro blog&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo! ya tiene nueva CEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-921856</guid>
		<description>[...] todavía es pronto para saber cuál será el resultado de este cambio, ya hay quien cree que es la solución a los problemas de Yahoo!, quien opina que posiblemente no haya sido una decisión acertada e incluso quien le da consejos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] todavía es pronto para saber cuál será el resultado de este cambio, ya hay quien cree que es la solución a los problemas de Yahoo!, quien opina que posiblemente no haya sido una decisión acertada e incluso quien le da consejos [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Lee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-921781</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-921781</guid>
		<description>To Deltaeye:

She would be no different than Chrysler&#039;s Lee Iaccoca who tried so hard and so long to discriminate against auto safety and then once cornered by regulation and public opinion,embraced and touted how safe Chrysler&#039;s cars are: Lookee airbags!

The irony in this economy is that she will be given a better chance to make changes because the last thing one wants to appear is taking &quot;Wall Street advice&quot;.

Bring the Call Centers and Help Desks back, service is key.  Ensure Yahoo! will not only be relevant but also vital during the Info-Infrastructure-build-out of America.

But, as Om said it first, time to clean house just as someone will else will do starting next Tuesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Deltaeye:</p>
<p>She would be no different than Chrysler&#8217;s Lee Iaccoca who tried so hard and so long to discriminate against auto safety and then once cornered by regulation and public opinion,embraced and touted how safe Chrysler&#8217;s cars are: Lookee airbags!</p>
<p>The irony in this economy is that she will be given a better chance to make changes because the last thing one wants to appear is taking &#8220;Wall Street advice&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bring the Call Centers and Help Desks back, service is key.  Ensure Yahoo! will not only be relevant but also vital during the Info-Infrastructure-build-out of America.</p>
<p>But, as Om said it first, time to clean house just as someone will else will do starting next Tuesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Yahoo Should Buy Hulu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-921750</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Yahoo Should Buy Hulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-921750</guid>
		<description>[...] Yahoo announced its decision yesterday to name Carol Bartz as its new CEO, it also quietly disclosed that President Sue Decker, who had been a likely contender for the chief [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yahoo announced its decision yesterday to name Carol Bartz as its new CEO, it also quietly disclosed that President Sue Decker, who had been a likely contender for the chief [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Ross</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-921748</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-921748</guid>
		<description>Its interesting that 2 important CEOs are joining new organizations at the same time (the other being Obama).  There&#039;s a lot of work for them both to do, but some of the issues and the processes that they have to follow are similar (but perhaps different in scale)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting that 2 important CEOs are joining new organizations at the same time (the other being Obama).  There&#8217;s a lot of work for them both to do, but some of the issues and the processes that they have to follow are similar (but perhaps different in scale)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-921746</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-921746</guid>
		<description>I think part of what Carol should do is manage expectations around Yahoo&#039;s future. Yahoo&#039;s principal failing was in adopting a me-too strategy and in trying to chase Google in the search space. Yahoo could have very well continued to be a successful company (measured by financial metrics) by focusing on its core market albeit with a lower growth rate than Google. But by spreading itself too thin, Yahoo lost focus on its core space and is now operationally inefficient as well. I believe Carol has the operational chops to fix Yahoo&#039;s apparent management issues, but doubt she (or anyone else for that matter) can recapture Yahoo&#039;s glory days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of what Carol should do is manage expectations around Yahoo&#8217;s future. Yahoo&#8217;s principal failing was in adopting a me-too strategy and in trying to chase Google in the search space. Yahoo could have very well continued to be a successful company (measured by financial metrics) by focusing on its core market albeit with a lower growth rate than Google. But by spreading itself too thin, Yahoo lost focus on its core space and is now operationally inefficient as well. I believe Carol has the operational chops to fix Yahoo&#8217;s apparent management issues, but doubt she (or anyone else for that matter) can recapture Yahoo&#8217;s glory days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/13/7-reasons-why-carol-bartz-is-right-for-yahoo/#comment-921705</link>
		<dc:creator>dragos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=35397#comment-921705</guid>
		<description>and yet past performance doesnot guarantee future success. she doesnt have an easy job at all and the older you get the softer. lets just hope for the best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and yet past performance doesnot guarantee future success. she doesnt have an easy job at all and the older you get the softer. lets just hope for the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
