<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:02:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wamphry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wamphry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Call me part of the problem, but I jail-broke my iPhone a week after I bought it. I have been tethering on AT&amp;T&#039;s network for almost a year with decent speeds usually 1-2 mbps using a Cydia app called PDAnet. If my phone gets stolen, I have an app running in the background that tracks my phone as long as it is turned on. I also have a free voice nav gps driving app called xGPS that is FREE... completely FREE, and it&#039;s nearly as good as my Garmin Nuvi! In fact I take that back, it&#039;s better than my Garmin because it pulls map info from google maps and doesn&#039;t cost $89 a year to update! AT&amp;T want&#039;s to charge users for tethering but, how can they when some of us have jail-broken phones and get it for free already. Until Apple and AT&amp;T can squash the Jail-Breaking... you won&#039;t see a tethering option for AT&amp;T unless the just decide to give it as a free service!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me part of the problem, but I jail-broke my iPhone a week after I bought it. I have been tethering on AT&amp;T&#8217;s network for almost a year with decent speeds usually 1-2 mbps using a Cydia app called PDAnet. If my phone gets stolen, I have an app running in the background that tracks my phone as long as it is turned on. I also have a free voice nav gps driving app called xGPS that is FREE&#8230; completely FREE, and it&#8217;s nearly as good as my Garmin Nuvi! In fact I take that back, it&#8217;s better than my Garmin because it pulls map info from google maps and doesn&#8217;t cost $89 a year to update! AT&amp;T want&#8217;s to charge users for tethering but, how can they when some of us have jail-broken phones and get it for free already. Until Apple and AT&amp;T can squash the Jail-Breaking&#8230; you won&#8217;t see a tethering option for AT&amp;T unless the just decide to give it as a free service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WKL</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is T&#039;s burden for having proper backhaul for wireless customers -- esp when in regions where they are the LEC.

No point to tell people they can drive @ 80 mph when you only provide a two-lane highway since everyone end up getting stuck.

There are microwave and E-Band microwave technologies and fiber lines they can deploy to improve backhaul consider how much financial resource they have.

It is a bloody shame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is T&#8217;s burden for having proper backhaul for wireless customers &#8212; esp when in regions where they are the LEC.</p>
<p>No point to tell people they can drive @ 80 mph when you only provide a two-lane highway since everyone end up getting stuck.</p>
<p>There are microwave and E-Band microwave technologies and fiber lines they can deploy to improve backhaul consider how much financial resource they have.</p>
<p>It is a bloody shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daTruth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tethering WILL NOT place a burden on AT&amp;T&#039;s network. Your laptop while tethered, CANNOT access any more bandwidth than what your iPhone can.

Any concerns from AT&amp;T contrary to this are pure FUD just to make more $ off iPhone users.

If AT&amp;T does charge for tethering, it will be a bogus charge and customers should strongly voice their complaints against this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tethering WILL NOT place a burden on AT&amp;T&#8217;s network. Your laptop while tethered, CANNOT access any more bandwidth than what your iPhone can.</p>
<p>Any concerns from AT&amp;T contrary to this are pure FUD just to make more $ off iPhone users.</p>
<p>If AT&amp;T does charge for tethering, it will be a bogus charge and customers should strongly voice their complaints against this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trevor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really don&#039;t think it will cause taht much of a strain to be honest.  Rarely would i ever use the tethering feature, but when i need it, it needs to be there.  Example of i&#039;m up at the cabin and i need up update my site, a simple 1mb worth of data (comic of the day), or send an email with a file that&#039;s on my computer, again probably won&#039;t bog down the network.  I highly doubt anyone will be playing online games like WoW on that connection, or downloading movies.  It&#039;s an important feature for a lot of business people, and they should allow it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t think it will cause taht much of a strain to be honest.  Rarely would i ever use the tethering feature, but when i need it, it needs to be there.  Example of i&#8217;m up at the cabin and i need up update my site, a simple 1mb worth of data (comic of the day), or send an email with a file that&#8217;s on my computer, again probably won&#8217;t bog down the network.  I highly doubt anyone will be playing online games like WoW on that connection, or downloading movies.  It&#8217;s an important feature for a lot of business people, and they should allow it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Top Tech Press to AT&#38;T: We Don&#8217;t Trust You Sidecut Reports</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Top Tech Press to AT&#38;T: We Don&#8217;t Trust You Sidecut Reports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 08:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on the cynical list is Om Malik, who has been hammering on Ma Bell&#8217;s wireless network problems for some time now. While duly reporting the facts of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the cynical list is Om Malik, who has been hammering on Ma Bell&#8217;s wireless network problems for some time now. While duly reporting the facts of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Moves Up Its LTE Rollout, Admits To Network Issues</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AT&#38;T Moves Up Its LTE Rollout, Admits To Network Issues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] company has so far been in complete denial about its network coverage. The limitations of its network were exposed during SXSW earlier this year. AT&amp;T has refused to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company has so far been in complete denial about its network coverage. The limitations of its network were exposed during SXSW earlier this year. AT&amp;T has refused to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Dan, you&#039;re not getting 2.3Mbs, though that might be what Windows Mobile tells you when you connect. That&#039;s the speed of the local connection to your PC, not your actual bandwidth.

The best wireless 3G download speeds are in the neighborhood of 700k-1Mb currently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Dan, you&#8217;re not getting 2.3Mbs, though that might be what Windows Mobile tells you when you connect. That&#8217;s the speed of the local connection to your PC, not your actual bandwidth.</p>
<p>The best wireless 3G download speeds are in the neighborhood of 700k-1Mb currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Won’t AT&#38;T Admit to Its Wireless Network Problems?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Won’t AT&#38;T Admit to Its Wireless Network Problems?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] or not, a lot of people signed up for AT&amp;T’s service, and many were soon disappointed by the lack of backhaul bandwidth. For me personally it got so bad, that I switched away from the iPhone (which I love, by the way) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or not, a lot of people signed up for AT&amp;T’s service, and many were soon disappointed by the lack of backhaul bandwidth. For me personally it got so bad, that I switched away from the iPhone (which I love, by the way) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Observations: Carriers - January 26, 2009</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Observations: Carriers - January 26, 2009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For! - Gigaom.com &#187; Apple Secrets</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For! - Gigaom.com &#187; Apple Secrets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 08:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For! - Gigaom.com [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For! &#8211; Gigaom.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is hard to decided whether or not this is a good thing.  On one hand, I would really like to add the feature to my service for ten dollars.  On the other hand, I get such unreliable service in the Chicago area already.  I can&#039;t imagine my phone service quality will go up with so much bandwith being used.  Maybe it will for ATT to upgrade their networks or offer tiered internet service or something.  I would pay a little more for better ipone data service if there was a way to differentiate different customers.  I mean we all pay more for 3G right?

Matt Kennedy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to decided whether or not this is a good thing.  On one hand, I would really like to add the feature to my service for ten dollars.  On the other hand, I get such unreliable service in the Chicago area already.  I can&#8217;t imagine my phone service quality will go up with so much bandwith being used.  Maybe it will for ATT to upgrade their networks or offer tiered internet service or something.  I would pay a little more for better ipone data service if there was a way to differentiate different customers.  I mean we all pay more for 3G right?</p>
<p>Matt Kennedy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarhawk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scarhawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&amp;T does not build out ahead of demand, they consider it a poor strategy for deploying capital.  Unless customers are eager to pay and/or are screaming to get what they think they&#039;re already paying for, money generates a better return in the bank than in the ground.  If they had any real competition it might be a different story, but they don&#039;t, so business-wise they&#039;re making the right decision.

Meanwhile, how hard is it to drop a metro fiber connection to a base station?  If tall buildings can get backhaul, so can towers, somebody just has to string it up the hill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T does not build out ahead of demand, they consider it a poor strategy for deploying capital.  Unless customers are eager to pay and/or are screaming to get what they think they&#8217;re already paying for, money generates a better return in the bank than in the ground.  If they had any real competition it might be a different story, but they don&#8217;t, so business-wise they&#8217;re making the right decision.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, how hard is it to drop a metro fiber connection to a base station?  If tall buildings can get backhaul, so can towers, somebody just has to string it up the hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am tethering now for almost a half a year on windows mobile.  The WM5 worked at 2.3mpbs as a dial up connection via either a USB or bluetooth connection.

Since the Ev-do upgrade for the T-mobile service and to WM6 on my smartphone (I used the MDA during dial up tests and Wing currently), the link is now displaying 10mbps when I open the connection icon in my task bar, though only connects close to 2.3 up and .5 down according to speedtest.net tests.

The connection speed varies, it is good for loading pages and non-complex java programs, but streaming video still needs additional buffer time.

A contemporary of mine is on the Sprint system using a Mogul and is connecting at slightly a faster rate.

Regardless, tethering is a great alternative to searching for wi-fi signals.  It takes only a few minutes to set up, actually, it is pretty much plug and play as they have updated the configuration to automatically install the proper drivers.

Sprint offers web access for $15 a month according to my friend.  I am paying $30 a month for T-mobile and have for the past three years now with mobile web capabilities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am tethering now for almost a half a year on windows mobile.  The WM5 worked at 2.3mpbs as a dial up connection via either a USB or bluetooth connection.</p>
<p>Since the Ev-do upgrade for the T-mobile service and to WM6 on my smartphone (I used the MDA during dial up tests and Wing currently), the link is now displaying 10mbps when I open the connection icon in my task bar, though only connects close to 2.3 up and .5 down according to speedtest.net tests.</p>
<p>The connection speed varies, it is good for loading pages and non-complex java programs, but streaming video still needs additional buffer time.</p>
<p>A contemporary of mine is on the Sprint system using a Mogul and is connecting at slightly a faster rate.</p>
<p>Regardless, tethering is a great alternative to searching for wi-fi signals.  It takes only a few minutes to set up, actually, it is pretty much plug and play as they have updated the configuration to automatically install the proper drivers.</p>
<p>Sprint offers web access for $15 a month according to my friend.  I am paying $30 a month for T-mobile and have for the past three years now with mobile web capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For! It&#8217;s rumored that AT&amp;T (s T) may soon allow people to tether their iPhones to their portable computers and use [...] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  iPhone Tethering? Be Careful What You Wish For! It&#8217;s rumored that AT&amp;T (s T) may soon allow people to tether their iPhones to their portable computers and use [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dropping By</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dropping By]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, AT&amp;T has to have a minimum of 4 T1s to a UMTS site to boast a 3.2Mbs advertising metric.  Two, a draw back to UMTS R5 - R6 is an ATM backhaul for cell site facilities.  This kills any efficiencies you could possibly gain on a T1 based or ethernet network in the transition from RNC to SGSN/MSC.  R7 or R8 is to oliviate this draw back but this will kill AT&amp;Ts TDM revenue stream from legacy POTS line or T1s.

There is the reason data services are slow.  A T1 on average is eight times as much as ethernet facilities.  AT&amp;T mobility leases millions of dollars of T1s from AT&amp;T and with the lose of that revenue stream kills AT&amp;Ts overall bottom line.  If you don&#039;t believe that AT&amp;T is still charging AT&amp;T Mobility(Cingular) for lease lines, check their quarterly reports for Q1 of 2006 and Q1 of 2008.  There should be a huge shift in OPEX on AT&amp;T mobilities part in the negative (good) and a huge drop in income on AT&amp;T part.

If AT&amp;T mobility converted to ethernet today, which they can do with inexpensive cisco CPE equipment, AT&amp;T would look live Verizon.  Legacy costs and revenue for AT&amp;T is a win-win because the equipment that the legacy facilities are on has depreciated to $0 and all revenue that comes in is straight cash for them.

Telcos are full of it and it is not about public service but money, but how can they survive if they didn&#039;t think this way.  Maybe they would have needed a bailout.  I like their arguement about not being obligated to rural carriers if the USF funds are not sufficient (&quot;if it don&#039;t make dollars, it don&#039;t make sense&quot;).  The Telcos will not build out these areas if Obama doesn&#039;t supply 100% of the capital needed or some rural competitor comes out smelling like roses and give them a reason to want central SD.

For the iPhone argument, they are wanting to know how bad you want it.  If the phone worked the first time, it would be too efficient and they need you to waste so money can be made off of it, &quot;by design&quot;.

I&#039;m getting an iPhone on the 30th of this month.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, AT&amp;T has to have a minimum of 4 T1s to a UMTS site to boast a 3.2Mbs advertising metric.  Two, a draw back to UMTS R5 &#8211; R6 is an ATM backhaul for cell site facilities.  This kills any efficiencies you could possibly gain on a T1 based or ethernet network in the transition from RNC to SGSN/MSC.  R7 or R8 is to oliviate this draw back but this will kill AT&amp;Ts TDM revenue stream from legacy POTS line or T1s.</p>
<p>There is the reason data services are slow.  A T1 on average is eight times as much as ethernet facilities.  AT&amp;T mobility leases millions of dollars of T1s from AT&amp;T and with the lose of that revenue stream kills AT&amp;Ts overall bottom line.  If you don&#8217;t believe that AT&amp;T is still charging AT&amp;T Mobility(Cingular) for lease lines, check their quarterly reports for Q1 of 2006 and Q1 of 2008.  There should be a huge shift in OPEX on AT&amp;T mobilities part in the negative (good) and a huge drop in income on AT&amp;T part.</p>
<p>If AT&amp;T mobility converted to ethernet today, which they can do with inexpensive cisco CPE equipment, AT&amp;T would look live Verizon.  Legacy costs and revenue for AT&amp;T is a win-win because the equipment that the legacy facilities are on has depreciated to $0 and all revenue that comes in is straight cash for them.</p>
<p>Telcos are full of it and it is not about public service but money, but how can they survive if they didn&#8217;t think this way.  Maybe they would have needed a bailout.  I like their arguement about not being obligated to rural carriers if the USF funds are not sufficient (&#8220;if it don&#8217;t make dollars, it don&#8217;t make sense&#8221;).  The Telcos will not build out these areas if Obama doesn&#8217;t supply 100% of the capital needed or some rural competitor comes out smelling like roses and give them a reason to want central SD.</p>
<p>For the iPhone argument, they are wanting to know how bad you want it.  If the phone worked the first time, it would be too efficient and they need you to waste so money can be made off of it, &#8220;by design&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting an iPhone on the 30th of this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajolie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/01/11/iphone-tethering-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comment-157574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ajolie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=35096#comment-157574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&amp;T literally makes me sick. The marketing guys there are saying, &quot;it&#039;s all about capacity utilization and ROA. Milk the damn system and fc*k customer satisfaction.&quot;  As long as there are a few big carriers, we will be stuck with companies thinking like the government.  When will we ever get an all IP, open network?  Maybe after India and China have one and keep kicking our asses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T literally makes me sick. The marketing guys there are saying, &#8220;it&#8217;s all about capacity utilization and ROA. Milk the damn system and fc*k customer satisfaction.&#8221;  As long as there are a few big carriers, we will be stuck with companies thinking like the government.  When will we ever get an all IP, open network?  Maybe after India and China have one and keep kicking our asses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

