7 Comments

Summary:

Verizon says it’s willing to provide access to its cellular network for wireless devices like the Kindle reader, according to Tony Lewis, vice president of open development at Verizon. He spoke to Reuters in the lead up to CES yesterday and said the public could expect […]

sony_10039_142154jpegVerizon says it’s willing to provide access to its cellular network for wireless devices like the Kindle reader, according to Tony Lewis, vice president of open development at Verizon. He spoke to Reuters in the lead up to CES yesterday and said the public could expect e-readers comparable to Amazon’s (AMZN) Kindle running on the Verizon Wireless network in 2009. If Verizon will offer wireless access to the Sony eReader, then economy be damned, I’m picking one up.

Aside from my own e-reader dreams, the news is welcome for those who have been curious as to how accessible Verizon’s open network will actually be. In November 2007, Verizon said it would open up its network to other devices. On Monday, the carrier released data showing its progress toward openness. I wasn’t impressed.

I thought we would have to pry Verizon’s network open with a crowbar, judging by the fact that in the last year it has certified two independent testing labs and fewer than 30 devices, all of which are tailored toward businesses. Not all of those devices are even commercially available. This is a far cry from being able to buy an unlocked phone and run it on Verizon’s network.

Even with the news that Verizon will offer wireless data for consumer devices, unlocked phones may never become a reality.  Products using data service only, and built by a major vendor responsible for customer service, are far easier to manage than a slew of unlocked devices running on the network. But the move to provide service for third-party consumer devices like the Kindle is a necessary one as carriers seek to grow their wireless data revenue and make full use of their networks. However, just because the network is open for products such as e-readers, that doesn’t mean it’s going to be used.

Amazon bundles its broadband costs into the price of books downloaded for the Kindle, while Dash navigation devices require a monthly subscription fee. Verizon Wireless’ network is awesome, but it’s pricey, and the company isn’t exactly keen on competition to its own services. We’ll have to see what kind of pricing model Verizon allows, and how much it will charge. As devices that access a cellular network become more common, it’s likely that a consumer won’t want to pay an ever-expanding number of wireless bills just to download books, music, real-time traffic, etc. And in the current downturn, they certainly won’t pay a lot for them.

  1. Buying a Sony Reader isn’t smart, since Amazon have waaaaaaaaay more content than Sony, are adding to it all the time, and their ebook prices are 1/2 – 1/3 what Sony charges.

    Sony Reader is an also-ran. I look for them to discontinue the product later this year.

    Share
  2. I have been using a Kindle for 10 months and love the wireless feature. In fact, the ability to download books and newspapers just about anywhere was why I bought it the device in the first place. However, the Kindle has very poor UI. It definitely needs a Rev 2 redesign, although Oprah has probably delayed the impetus for that.

    Share
  3. [...] Verizon’s Open Network Starts Slow But There’s Hope [...]

    Share
  4. [...]  As devices that access a cellular network become more common, it’s likely that a consumer won’t want to pay an ever-expanding number of wireless bills just to download books, music, real-time traffic, etc. And in the current downturn, they certainly won’t pay a lot for them.  Gigaom.com [...]

    Share
  5. Even if you get access to the network there are a lot of restrictions. Take for example of cursing. If there’s cussing, they won’t put it on their network. Can you imagine audio books that can’t have cursing? Boring.. Listen to the stories on NewFiction.com . They have modern language.

    Share
  6. [...] that was more of a nightmare than a dream. Last year, there weren’t a ton of non-Verizon devices allowed on to the network, and most of those were business or vertical-market specific. I suspect [...]

    Share
  7. it will increasingly be not ‘device openness’ as much as ‘app openness’ that is important. i would not mind using a verizon device if i was allowed to run ‘any application’ such as skype or bittorennt without restriction.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post