Comments on: How the WSJ Failed the Web 2.0 Test http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/ Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:38:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: La prensa y los tiempos modernos « Telematica & Linux http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155431 Wed, 13 May 2009 20:17:43 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155431 [...] en GigaOM a cuenta del artículo del pasado domingo sobre Google y la neutralidad de la red, en “How the WSJ Failed the Web 2.0 Test”: que no actualizó la noticia cuando a las pocas horas aparecieron nuevos elementos [...]

]]> By: A Slight Delay » Blog Archive » (Don’t) Stop the Presses! http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155430 Fri, 02 Jan 2009 01:55:00 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155430 [...] Surowiecki has News You Can Lose. Finally, Gigaom’s Mathew Ingram writes perceptively about How the WSJ Failed the Web 2.0 Test, offering some insight in the process as to how and why the traditional news media have fallen [...]

]]> By: How the WSJ failed the Web 2.0 test — mathewingram.com/work http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155429 Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:24:03 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155429 [...] the rest of this post at GigaOm [...]

]]> By: jhn http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155428 Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:33:52 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155428 @les madras

No, there is nothing to “spin.” Google is right and the WSJ is wrong. Edge caching is available to anyone who can pay for it. That’s the only kind of NN that Google has ever wanted–no *exclusive* deals.

]]> By: Linkdump 25 | ettf.net http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155427 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:03:45 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155427 [...] Gigaom reckons WSJ failed the Web 2.0 test [...]

]]> By: Críticas al WSJ y a la prensa por no aprovechar la riqueza de la red | Radiocable.com - Radio por Internet http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155426 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:20:02 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155426 [...] declaracion de Laurence Lessig, que era mencionado en la historia, corrigiendo esa interpretación. Matthew Ingram considera que este es un ejemplo perfecto de cómo la prensa tradicional sigue fallando a la hora entender el nuevo periodismo digital por no [...]

]]> By: irina slutsky http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155425 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:02:39 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155425 i am so frustrated — honestly, WSJ needs to be up on its game already! i just wish this transition wouldn’t take so long. its clear that newspapers will not be on paper very soon and yet we still go on acting as if the physical paper is still a necessary part of the business. just like pretending that updating a story as the day goes on will make the story less PRISTINE or less TRUE. i kinda wanna dissect this specific situation do the gristle and know WHO there made the decision not to blog or update the story as information came in and see what the problem is at the WSJ — i have worked two newspapers before things started falling apart and there is always one or two ppl making the final decision. so who was it who said don’t touch the story?

]]> By: Los bloggers, el periodismo y la venta de humo | Juan Manuel Lucero http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155424 Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:07:48 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155424 [...] el WSJ en GigaOM a cuenta de su reciente artículo sobre Google y la neutralidad de la red, en “How the WSJ Failed the Web 2.0 Test”: que no actualizó la noticia cuando a las pocas horas aparecieron nuevos elementos fundamentales [...]

]]> By: Mathew Ingram http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155423 Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:59:01 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155423 Thanks for the comments, everyone. And to @Chris, I know that most newspapers don’t take this approach — I work for one. I’m trying to think (and talk) about what we *should* be doing, rather than what we are currently doing.

]]> By: Andrew Golis » Blog Archive » links for 2008-12-17 http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/#comment-155422 Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:02:22 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32452#comment-155422 [...] How the WSJ Failed the Web 2.0 Test This is a perfect example of, well beyond the economic modeling, newspapers are still slow to embrace the journalistic improvements that the web allows. This is just bad journalism, and the WSJ should be better than that. (tags: new.media newspaper journalism wsj gigaom) [...]

]]>