Comments on: Google NOT Turning Its Back on Network Neutrality http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/ Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:43:11 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Net’s Still Neutral (For Now) http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-920986 Net’s Still Neutral (For Now) Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:53:21 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-920986 <p>[...] Update: Google has claimed the WSJ is “confused” about its intentions and has not–as the WSJ suggests–turned its back on net [...]</p> [...] Update: Google has claimed the WSJ is “confused” about its intentions and has not–as the WSJ suggests–turned its back on net [...]

]]> By: Web hosting video streaming | Video Web Hosting http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918865 Web hosting video streaming | Video Web Hosting Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:08:30 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918865 <p>[...] Updated @ 9:30 pm : In response to an earlier story in The Wall Street Journal, Google offered a clarification and reaffirmed its stance on network neutrality and pointed out that it is not backing away from it. It has dismissed the WSJ story as Video Web Hosting News [...]</p> [...] Updated @ 9:30 pm : In response to an earlier story in The Wall Street Journal, Google offered a clarification and reaffirmed its stance on network neutrality and pointed out that it is not backing away from it. It has dismissed the WSJ story as Video Web Hosting News [...]

]]> By: Sothink web video downloader download serial patch | Video Web Hosting http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918605 Sothink web video downloader download serial patch | Video Web Hosting Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:45:36 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918605 <p>[...] Updated @ 9:30 pm : In response to an earlier story in The Wall Street Journal, Google offered a clarification and reaffirmed its stance on network neutrality and pointed out that it is not backing away from it. It has dismissed the WSJ story as Video Web Hosting Data [...]</p> [...] Updated @ 9:30 pm : In response to an earlier story in The Wall Street Journal, Google offered a clarification and reaffirmed its stance on network neutrality and pointed out that it is not backing away from it. It has dismissed the WSJ story as Video Web Hosting Data [...]

]]> By: Net Neutrality and the Obama Stimulus Package | domain names | http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918384 Net Neutrality and the Obama Stimulus Package | domain names | Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:10:49 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918384 <p>[...] disruptive or not—and whether they will ultimately succeed or not. Friend Om Malik warns “Many startups might skip over this issue, which I constantly bring up, but they need to wake [...]</p> [...] disruptive or not—and whether they will ultimately succeed or not. Friend Om Malik warns “Many startups might skip over this issue, which I constantly bring up, but they need to wake [...]

]]> By: WSJ: Google Seeking Preferential Treatment from ISPs | domain names | http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918382 WSJ: Google Seeking Preferential Treatment from ISPs | domain names | Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:05:52 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918382 <p>[...] Google Not Turning Its Back on Network Neutrality (GigaOm, 12/14/2008 9:35 p.m.) Net Neutrality and the Benefits of Caching (Response from Google, [...]</p> [...] Google Not Turning Its Back on Network Neutrality (GigaOm, 12/14/2008 9:35 p.m.) Net Neutrality and the Benefits of Caching (Response from Google, [...]

]]> By: How the WSJ failed the Web 2.0 test — mathewingram.com/work http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918240 How the WSJ failed the Web 2.0 test — mathewingram.com/work Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:30:23 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918240 <p>[...] part of it that cares about accuracy and integrity, does pretty well. Sites like GigaOM and others update their posts when information is added or corrected, and in many cases link to critical or differing opinions [...]</p> [...] part of it that cares about accuracy and integrity, does pretty well. Sites like GigaOM and others update their posts when information is added or corrected, and in many cases link to critical or differing opinions [...]

]]> By: How the WSJ Failed the Web 2.0 Test http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918215 How the WSJ Failed the Web 2.0 Test Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:17:59 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918215 <p>[...] part of it that cares about accuracy and integrity, does pretty well. Sites like GigaOM and others update their posts when information is added or corrected, and in many cases link to critical or differing opinions [...]</p> [...] part of it that cares about accuracy and integrity, does pretty well. Sites like GigaOM and others update their posts when information is added or corrected, and in many cases link to critical or differing opinions [...]

]]> By: Brett Glass http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918178 Brett Glass Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:44:04 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918178 <p>Om, why does your argument above again rely on the false premise that Internet service is a duopoly? The fact is that there are more than 4,000 independent, competitive ISPs in this country, of which I am one. Impose "network neutrality" regulation, and it would strangle that competition and create the duopoly you so deplore.</p> <p>Google, on the other hand, <em>is</em> a monopoly. That's the reason why the government's extremely laissez-faire officials -- who let XM merge with Sirius, AT&T with SBC, and Verizon with Alltel -- nonetheless cried foul when Google tried to execute a deal (not even a complete merger) with Yahoo!.</p> <p>And Google has bought many friends with its money. The salary of Larry Lessig is largely paid by Google's grants to Lessig's operation at Stanford University, and the lobbying groups that filed the "network neutrality" complaint against Comcast at the FCC are likewise the beneficiaries of Google's "largesse." Is it any wonder that they are all subtly shifting their positions (especially Lessig) to toe Google's line?</p> Om, why does your argument above again rely on the false premise that Internet service is a duopoly? The fact is that there are more than 4,000 independent, competitive ISPs in this country, of which I am one. Impose “network neutrality” regulation, and it would strangle that competition and create the duopoly you so deplore.

Google, on the other hand, is a monopoly. That’s the reason why the government’s extremely laissez-faire officials — who let XM merge with Sirius, AT&T with SBC, and Verizon with Alltel — nonetheless cried foul when Google tried to execute a deal (not even a complete merger) with Yahoo!.

And Google has bought many friends with its money. The salary of Larry Lessig is largely paid by Google’s grants to Lessig’s operation at Stanford University, and the lobbying groups that filed the “network neutrality” complaint against Comcast at the FCC are likewise the beneficiaries of Google’s “largesse.” Is it any wonder that they are all subtly shifting their positions (especially Lessig) to toe Google’s line?

]]> By: Neutralidad de la Red: Google y el caché a nivel local -- yamilsalinas.net http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918161 Neutralidad de la Red: Google y el caché a nivel local -- yamilsalinas.net Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:33:37 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918161 <p>[...] que se armó un buen cortocircuito respecto a la posición de Google sobre la Neutralidad de la Red. Como sabemos, los amigos de la G [...]</p> [...] que se armó un buen cortocircuito respecto a la posición de Google sobre la Neutralidad de la Red. Como sabemos, los amigos de la G [...]

]]> By: Up And Down Vote « Digitalics http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918154 Up And Down Vote « Digitalics Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:23:23 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918154 <p>[...] writers quickly noted–here, and here–that Google at least is simply caching content closer to customers, just like [...]</p> [...] writers quickly noted–here, and here–that Google at least is simply caching content closer to customers, just like [...]

]]> By: Michael F. Smith Jr. Lives Here » Blog Archive » Blog birthing & evil google… http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918148 Michael F. Smith Jr. Lives Here » Blog Archive » Blog birthing & evil google… Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:55:27 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918148 <p>[...] tells it like it is here: Given how close President-elect Obama is to the current Google management, I can only fear the [...]</p> [...] tells it like it is here: Given how close President-elect Obama is to the current Google management, I can only fear the [...]

]]> By: Neno Brown http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918140 Neno Brown Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:19:06 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918140 <p>Google! welcome to the world of corporate finance, time to start wearing suites, hobnobing with poloticians, maybe start getting into missile technology while your at it.</p> Google! welcome to the world of corporate finance, time to start wearing suites, hobnobing with poloticians, maybe start getting into missile technology while your at it.

]]> By: TopViet http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918134 TopViet Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:34:25 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918134 <p>Google may listen to the public.</p> Google may listen to the public.

]]> By: bwl zwei null · Google und die Netzneutralität http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918126 bwl zwei null · Google und die Netzneutralität Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:02:22 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918126 <p>[...] Om Malik geht in seiner Betrachtung zum Thema deshalb so weit, dass er Google unterstellt, deren Motto “do not evil” sei nichts weiter als heiße Luft (”nothing more than hot air”). Abgebrühtere Naturen wie etwa Henry Blodget (Silicon Alley Insider) finden dagegen nichts Verwerfliches am Vorgehen von Google. Er kritisiert eher das Konzept der Netzneutralität und bezeichnet es als eine absurde Überzeugung (”absurd conviction”). [...]</p> [...] Om Malik geht in seiner Betrachtung zum Thema deshalb so weit, dass er Google unterstellt, deren Motto “do not evil” sei nichts weiter als heiße Luft (”nothing more than hot air”). Abgebrühtere Naturen wie etwa Henry Blodget (Silicon Alley Insider) finden dagegen nichts Verwerfliches am Vorgehen von Google. Er kritisiert eher das Konzept der Netzneutralität und bezeichnet es als eine absurde Überzeugung (”absurd conviction”). [...]

]]> By: grant czerepak http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918125 grant czerepak Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:00:08 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918125 <p>The reality is Google is evil. However, it is a new evil and we are not equipped to deal with it yet. And Google is not the only new evil company out there.</p> The reality is Google is evil. However, it is a new evil and we are not equipped to deal with it yet. And Google is not the only new evil company out there.

]]> By: 1986 To Present » Blog Archive » Google 不会放弃互联网中立性的原则 http://gigaom.com/2008/12/14/google-turns-its-back-on-network-neutrality/#comment-918124 1986 To Present » Blog Archive » Google 不会放弃互联网中立性的原则 Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:47:37 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=32163#comment-918124 <p>[...] 在华尔街日报的文章发表后,这篇文章迅速被各大科技博客转载引用,很多人都发表了自己的看法.其中比较有代表性的是一篇 GigaOM 发表的文章(其他文章基本都引用了他的内容,文后有链接提供). [...]</p> [...] 在华尔街日报的文章发表后,这篇文章迅速被各大科技博客转载引用,很多人都发表了自己的看法.其中比较有代表性的是一篇 GigaOM 发表的文章(其他文章基本都引用了他的内容,文后有链接提供). [...]

]]>